The Last Temptation of Congress

The so-called “Super Committee” seems to be like the Democratic Super Delegates, an excessively powerful sub-group that does even less good than the whole. In this case, it has admitted defeat, which means Republican and Democratic mainstays take hits in the budget. I wouldn’t call it defeat, since the “cuts” won’t kick in for years and allocations can be increased in subsequent budgets along the way.

In a short time, the deadline will pass for the proposed budget to be posted publicly for 72 hours, making it impossible to vote on the bill by the date set forth in the original agreement over the summer. The sticking points are the same as always. Democrats want to increase taxes to put off making cuts. Republicans want to put off tax increases by cutting the items which grow the fastest, social programs. In this particular game of chicken, they’re jumping out of the car as it goes over the cliff.

Here’s something I thought about tonight. What if the cuts aren’t the problem, but the public review? Many other pieces of garbage regulation either had no public viewing period or avoided it by some legalistic measure. Imagine if they passed this revised spending plan by throwing in a bunch of pork projects and insider trading opportunities like they usually do. If people found these things in the bill and let them be known, Congressmen could not plead ignorance after the fact. Instead, they decided to let the previous decision stand. What if the public review period could actually keep Congress honest, or at least less obviously corrupt?

It might be the first good use of the Internet since Al Gore invented it.

The Latest on the Penn State Child Sex Abuse Scandal

h/t Angry Black Lady Chronicles (via Angry Little Girls)

I don’t know about YOU, but I’ve got OWS Fatigue, thanks to the media going full tilt on it. Overkill, overdone, over IT. Stick a fork in it a serve it up Thursday, I say.

Now what’s going on at Penn State and the rest of central Pennsylvania, THAT I can get some outrage mustered over. Especially considering that the first victim to come forward has had to leave his school in the middle of his senior year because his fellow students were bullying & threatening him.

Victim One, the first known alleged victim of abuse by former Penn State coach Jerry Sandusky, had to leave his school in the middle of his senior year because of bullying, his counselor said Sunday.

Officials at Central Mountain High School in Clinton County weren’t providing guidance for fellow students, who were reacting badly about Joe Paterno’s firing and blaming the 17-year-old, said Mike Gillum, the psychologist helping his family. Those officials were unavailable for comment this weekend.The name-calling and verbal threats were just too much, he said.

This answers the age old question of why victims are reluctant to report, especially when sex crimes are involved: because they are relentlessly harassed if they do. I want to know where the school administrators were during all of this, and what steps they are taking now. Names should be taken and more heads should roll.

There’s some good news, though. Penn State is throwing its weight behind an independent investigation of the University’s actions in the case, going all the way back to 1975. They’ve hired Louis Freeh to head the investigation.

Louis Freeh, former FBI director, will lead an independent investigation into the details of the sex abuse case involving former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky.

The time frame of the investigation could go back to 1975, Freeh said, two years before Sandusky started his Second Mile charity to help at-risk children. According to the grand jury report, all of the alleged victims met Sandusky through the Second Mile.

“We’re not conducting a criminal investigation,” Freeh said. “If we find or run across any evidence of criminality, we will report that immediately. We will ask criminal investigators for their help.”

In addition, Second Mile is considering its next steps, which include closing down the organization entirely.

“Because the focus of our organization is on the children, The Second Mile is currently exploring three options: (1) restructuring the organization and keeping its programs going, even if it means doing so at a reduced level of service and funding, (2) maintaining the programs by transferring them to other organizations or (3) not continuing,” the statement said.

“Our primary goal is to sustain the programs for the sake of the kids.”

About a quarter of the 32-member board has quit since the charges against Sandusky were announced on November 5, the source said.

That’s a lot of board members resigning…

And finally, wrapping it up, Penn State stares down the barrel of a series of expected civil lawsuits:

The university is vulnerable because the investigation suggests it knew that Mr. Sandusky was suspected of preying on children and did little to stop it. But Penn State faces a dilemma: some of the options available to it as it considers a legal defense could have negative repercussions on its reputation.

Given the growing number of plaintiffs, the alleged cover-up described in the grand jury report, and possible civil rights violations that might push some lawsuits to federal court, the legal picture for the university is expected to get very messy, very fast.

You know how I feel about that: Good. These things never change unless significant amounts of cash are at stake–and lost.

Taylor Swift


Last night Taylor Swift won her second American Music Awards “Artist of the Year” award. It was her tenth AMA award in 12 nominations. She’s also won four Grammys, thirteen Teen Choice Awards and six CMT awards. She’s won just about everything possible and has a total of ninety awards out of 146 nominations.

She turns 22 next month.

Wikipedia:

In 2006, she released her debut single “Tim McGraw”, then her self-titled debut album, which was subsequently certified multi-platinum by the Recording Industry Association of America. In November 2008, Swift released her second album, Fearless, and the recording earned Swift four Grammy Awards, including the Album of the Year, at the 52nd Grammy Awards. Fearless and Taylor Swift finished 2008 at number-three and number-six respectively, with sales of 2.1 and 1.5 million. Fearless topped the Billboard 200 for 11 non-consecutive weeks. Swift was named Artist of the Year by Billboard Magazine in 2009. Swift released her third album Speak Now on October 25, 2010, which sold 1,047,000 copies in its first week.

In 2008, her albums sold a combined four million copies, making her the best-selling musician of the year in the United States, according to Nielsen SoundScan. Forbes ranked Swift 2009′s 69th-most powerful celebrity with earnings of $18 million, 2010′s 12th-most powerful celebrity with earnings of $45 million and 2011′s 7th-most powerful celebrity with earnings of $45 million, too. Swift was ranked the 38th Best Artist of the 2000s by Billboard. In January 2010 Nielsen SoundScan listed Swift as the most successful digital artist in music history with over 34.3 million digital tracks sold. On June 2011, renowned site The Boot named Swift and Carrie Underwood The Country Royalty, as they were the only female country artists to be ranked on Rolling Stone’s Queens of Pop list. As of March 2011, she has sold over 20 million albums and 34.3 million singles worldwide. She has been listed in the 2012 Guinness Book Of World Records as the Fastest Selling Digital Album by a Female Artist for her album Speak Now, and Most Simultaneous U.S. Hot 100 Hits by a Female Artist. In 2011, Billboard named her woman of the year.


Unlike many young artists Taylor Swift isn’t the result of exploitive packaging and promotion. She writes her own music and runs her own production company. She rarely drinks and doesn’t use drugs or make pornified music videos. She’s either genuinely nice of one hell of an actress.

CBS:

But it’s Taylor’s way of tirelessly courting her fans that may be the key to her success. Remarkably, she spends an hour before every show, meeting and greeting and charming.

She was a pioneer in using social media to connect personally with her fans: posting funny video blogs she edits herself with glimpses of her offstage life, making her fans feel like they’re part of her close circle of friends.

And she’s orchestrated her concerts too – to get as close to her fans as any performer we’ve ever seen. Halfway through the show she walks through the audience and sings three songs to the people in the back.

All while members of her team search the crowd for the most enthusiastic fans, and reward them with gold! An invitation to hang out with Taylor after the show.


If she keeps going like that for another five years she’s going to own the record books.

Click here to watch her 60 Minutes interview.

I’ve been a Taylor Swift fan since I first saw this video:



Occupy Post-Mortem

Wait, I wasn't done yet! Mic check! MIC CHECK!


I keep seeing people making statements like this one from Katrina vanden Heuvel:

But Occupy is a protest movement — one that has transformed the landscape of politics, by forcing the country to face the reality of entrenched inequality and power and address what should be done about it.

Seriously? I guess that’s not as over the top as declaring that OWS is just like Christianity minus Christ, but it’s still not accurate.

Occupy Wall Street started slightly over two months ago. What did it accomplish?

Elections won: none

Candidates: none

Legislation: none

Regulations: none (unless you count the new Zuccotti Rules)

Sure, they’ve gotten a lot of airplay lately, but so has Kim Kardashian, and her 72 day marriage lasted longer than the “occupation” of Zuccotti Park. And in both cases the coverage has not been entirely positive.

As for numbers, the highest estimates for last week’s Mother Of All Protests drew less people than the average home game at nearby Yankee Stadium.

Now the latest spin is that OWS isn’t political.

WTF? A non-political protest against government?

Then there are the tin foil hat brigades who are convinced that the media is out to make OWS look bad.

I hate to break it to them, but the Occupiers didn’t need any help in making themselves look bad.

Here is my prediction: The OWS true believers will remain true believers. They will blame others (including us) for the failure of the movement.

Koolaid is a helluva drug.



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 273 other followers