The real question with Romney


Willard “Mitt” Romney is the GOP establishment pick for the nomination. Unlike the situation with Obama in 2008 where the Democratic establishment was secretly backing Obama over Hillary, here the Republicans have made no secret of their desires. They want Mitt. It remains to be seen how far they will go to make it happen.

The real question with Romney is whether he’ll gain enough votes from independents in the middle to compensate for the votes he’ll lose from the base. Romney’s strength (if you can really call it that) is that he is more likely to appeal to swing voters than an ideologically pure conservative like Santorum.

But what if the conservative base decides they are tired of holding their noses to vote and decides to stay home next November?

BTW – The Obamacrats need to show more class. This isn’t a pick-up basketball game and many people are turned off by trash talk. For examples of classy politics, see Clinton, Bill or Hillary.


Say what?

Via Althouse, here’s a snippet from a letter by Jim Messina, Campaign Manager for Obama for America re Iowa:

The extremist Tea Party agenda won a clear victory. No matter who the Republicans nominate, we’ll be running against someone who has embraced that agenda in order to win — vowing to let Wall Street write its own rules, end Medicare as we know it, roll back gay rights, leave the troops in Iraq indefinitely, restrict a woman’s right to choose, and gut Social Security to pay for more tax cuts for millionaires and corporations.


I’ve been paying attention to the Tea Party since it first emerged from the astroturf laboratory of Dick Armey. Even before it turned into a grassroots coalition and ran amok, it has never been about abortion, gay rights or Iraq.

I got this from the Tea Party Express website:

The Tea Party Express is proud to stand for six simple principles

No more bailouts
Reduce the size and intrusiveness of government
Stop raising our taxes
Repeal Obamacare
Cease out-of-control spending
Bring back American prosperity


Tea Party Patriots:

Tea Party Patriots does not have a foreign policy. We have three core principles: fiscal responsibility, constitutionally limited government, and free market solutions.


That’s two of the largest Tea Party organizations. There are several major groups and lots more little ones. Nobody speaks for all of them, but the common thread among them all is the idea of smaller government and lower taxes.

The Tea Partiers don’t like Wall Street, and they want government to keep its hands off of Social Security and Medicare. The Tea Party members are mostly conservative Republicans and independents, which means they tend to support conservative positions on issues like abortion and gay rights. But those are not Tea Party issues.

I’m not a Tea Partier. I’ve never had any interest in joining up or participating with any or the TP groups. That’s because I disagree with them on almost every issue.

On the other hand, I respect their right to assemble and petition for redress of grievances, and I admire their effectiveness. I don’t think Tea Partiers are evil, bad, stupid, ignorant or racist. They are generally good people who have DIFFERENT beliefs, and they have just as much right to them as we do to ours.

Here’s what so many people fail to grasp:

In a democratic system, when bad laws are passed (or good laws repealed) IT IS NOT THE END OF THE WORLD!

Let’s say the Republicans managed to end Social Security. What would happen?

Within a very short time they would either reinstate it or replace it with something similar. If they didn’t they would be replaced in the next election by people who would.

Our history shows that sooner or later the party in power will be out of power and vice versa. In my lifetime there have been eleven different presidents and control of the White House has changed hands between the parties six times. In 1992 the Democrats had the White House and both houses of Congress. In 2002 the Republicans held full control. In 2008 the Democrats were in charge again. For most of my life the parties have shared power with one holding the White House and the other holding Congress.

Somehow we’ve managed to survive.



Who’s Behind Door Number Eight?


How weird is this year’s election? The guy who won/tied/narrowly lost (depending on the latest numbers) the Iowa GOP caucuses last night is a guy we haven’t talked about all year. Until two weeks ago he was polling the the low single-digits and a week ago he barely had a pulse.

Meet Rick “man on dog” Santorum, our Not-Romney of the week.

Rick Santorum is a former Senator from Pennsylvania. He was elected to the Senate during the Republican Revolution of 1994 and voted out of office during the Democratic Tsunami of 2006. Believe it or not he was present at every major GOP primary debate in 2011 and hasn’t ever been caught with a live boy or a dead girl.

It goes without saying that Santorum is a conservative, but while all GOP candidates say they oppose abortion and gay marriage few are as enthusiastic about it as he is. He thinks states should be able to ban contraceptives.

I’m not going to take the time to cover Santorum in much detail because I don’t expect to see him stick around for long. Actually, I give him a week until the New Hampshire primary.

Rick Santorum spent the past nine months kissing every elbow and rubbing every baby in Iowa. He didn’t have much money to spend so he didn’t have any other choice. But now he’s under the gun. Following New Hampshire on January 10th is South Carolina on the 25th and Florida on the 31st.

The real story last night was Mitt Romney’s failure to win big. It wasn’t unexpected, his polling has remained consistent for months now. The fact is 75% of the GOP voters want anybody but Mitt.

Not only was turnout lower than expected, but Romney actually got fewer votes this year than he did four years ago. Apparently six of his original supporters died since then.

Tim Pawlenty has to be kicking himself right now.



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 271 other followers