Actress Who Plays Palin Found Her Selection ‘Pretty Terrifying’
The prospect of Sarah Palin as the Republican vice presidential nominee in 2008 was “pretty terrifying” to actress Julianne Moore, who plays Palin in HBO’s upcoming Game Change movie about the 2008 campaign, but not because she feared Palin’s policies. Instead, the self-described “longtime liberal” dreaded Palin might allow the GOP ticket to win: “I really felt like, ‘Oh my gosh, the Republicans might have this election’” since “she was so electrifying.”
[...]
Moore explained how she recognized Palin’s political appeal:
Here’s a woman who’s a parent, who’s an actual working mother, who worked her way up from local government, who was definitely middle working class, married to a commercial fisherman….She was incredibly relatable, she was attractive, she was young; she was speaking to a wide portion of the population that didn’t feel that they’d been noticed or seen or heard.
[...]
“I would say, as a registered Democrat and longtime liberal, I think that I speak for a lot of women when I say that when [Palin] burst onto the scene, the way that she did that was pretty terrifying because I really felt like, Oh my gosh, the Republicans might have this election,” Moore recalled of her first perceptions of Palin back in 2008. “She was so electrifying as a figure, it kind of blew everyone away.”
At last, some honesty.
The freak-out over Sarah Palin began within hours of the announcement that she had been selected as John McCain’s running mate. All the supposed reasons for the freak-out came later.
Is it just me or has the media been kinder to Sarah the past few months? Now that she’s no longer a potential candidate for this cycle they have no vested interest in tearing her down.
If (when) Mittrick Romneysantorum loses to Obama in November, will that make Sarah the front runner for 2016?
Filed under: Palinpalooza, Sarah Palin Tagged: | Palinpalooza, Sarah Palin

And now Moore is doing her bit to make sure Palin remains neutralized.
The ends justify the means. The motto of the new Dems.
“If (when) Mittrick Romneysantorum loses to Obama in November, will that make Sarah the front runner for 2016?”
I don’t know, I’m kind of hoping for a brokered convention. Maybe the GOP will find an entirely new candidate. Maybe Palin will be appointed. Maybe she’s going to give Mitt the “severely conservative” credentials he lacks.
I think there’s still plenty of time for the stars to align and Obama to lose 2012.
Not a Santorum fan but this ad is pretty funny:
This made me laugh too. Palin on Fox & Friends today.
Mitt should know better to say “he doesn’t know what Palin means by him not being conservative enough” – she’s quite happy to spell it out.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/1453595273001/sarah-palin-talks-gop-presidential-field/?playlist_id=87937
LOL, that is funny! Gawd, Romney really is stupid. I mean come on, two thirds of conservatives doubt his conservatism. A few weeks ago Palin said he needed to work harder to convince them. Now he’s like, what credibility gap? What lack of enthusiasm? Dude, conservatives are still in Anybody But Romney mode! That’s why Newt kicked your butt, quickly followed by Santorum’s sweep. Heck, even Ron Paul is starting to build momentum.
She was also just on America’s Newsroom and said the election will be a choice between the party of government and the party of freedom.
Love how she can soundbite things so effectively.
Oh, remember John Kerry’s little “hockey puck” accident ?
http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/51563
It’s a miracle! Who knew getting hit in the face with a puck makes your eye bags disappear
I wonder if he & Botox Biden go to the same plastic surgeon.
Sarah is a voice for the American citizen that Washington forgot.
She says what many of us think. She has faith in the American people. She knows what makes them tick.and will stand up for them.
That scares the hell out of the PTB
found this story interesting
use the RICO act against the owies?????
http://biggovernment.com/dwohl/2012/02/15/rico-statutes-good-enough-for-the-mob-good-enough-for-occupywallstreet/
the obots will be going bonkers
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/02/whoa-sarah-palin-says-obamas-actions-are-un-american-video/
She’s right. Worse, Obama took a non-issue, a settled argument, contraception, and made it subject to debate. Just a few weeks ago Romney was backed into a corner by one of the debate moderators and said, “leave it alone, it’s working, contraception is not an issue.” But by poking people in the eye with a sharp stick, Obama has made it an issue and there will be a backlash. What was once an established right in this country has now become a political debate subject to legislation and discussion. Obama did that, Dems did that, not Republicans.
Dems got rid of habeas corpus too. They’re now the party for eliminating all civil liberties. How did that happen?
Palin summed it up : it’s turning into the Party of Government vs. the Party of Freedom.
Obama is sure doing a bang-up job of rehabilitating the GOP. Way to go.
check this ploy by planned parenthood against a Catholic charity
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/now-planned-parenthood-bullies-catholic-food-bank-for-saying-no-to-them
Looks like a lame political stunt by PP. It’s amazing that an organization that you’d otherwise like and support acts like assholes to the point that you don’t like them. Now that’s an accomplishment.
Santorum has just surged to a 12 point lead over Romney. I feel like Obama practically said, hmm, how could we give this nut job neanderthal some validity? I know, let’s poke the Catholic church in the eye so people will rally towards him as the great defender of religious freedom. In the blink of an eye Santorum went from having a constituency of about 8% Republican support, to front runner. Santorum didn’t do that, Obama did.
If PP keeps up their antics, in no time at all we’re going to have anti-contraception legislation.
The ultimate irony of it all is that contraception was recently an established right not even subject to negotiation and the Catholic church was already providing coverage in at least 28 states. In politics you’re supposed to be smart enough to pick your fights wisely because the last thing you want to do is hand the other guy the moral upper hand.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/democrats-warn-new-menace-religious-liberty-fight-christian-scientist-shoesalesmen-democrats-warn-new-menace-religious-lib
it is getting deeper by the day
“In the blink of an eye we’re going to have anti-contraception legislation.”
ta dah! Scott Brown, senator from my state, is sponsoring the anti-contraception Blunt amendment.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/210731-warren-brown-spar-on-spending-contraception
Interesting. My mother is pro-choice. And the Catholic church takes her money every week.
They would have taken the donations; they just did not want to send a truck to pick it up because they were afraid it was a set-up for some kind of publicity stunt.
I don’t know if I can blame them for being suspicious.
you have Sarah and then there is maxine hell of a difference and just who do the msm attack???
Saw Sarah on Fox and Friends and saw her at CPAC. Pray for a brokered convention because something has changed in her. I believe the door is open. Only God can arrange this, so START PRAYING!
I agree with Denise – my new candidate is Brokered Convention.
I would love to get rid of both parties, since they are bent on, IMHO, destroying this country. Some of you are against a third party, but I just heard of AmericanElect.org — a new organization established as way to byipass both parties this election cycle and those to follow. (Lynn Rothschild is involved.)
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/02/14/not-too-late-for-americans-elect-to-win-2012-presidential-election.html
In 1992 a three-way race got the incumbent out of office.
Yes Virginia, there is a Stop Romney movement, Vote Paul
We only have two choices and no write-ins allowed. Might be fun.
http://www.redalertpolitics.com/2012/02/grassroots-supporters-of-gingrich-organize-for-paul-in-virginia/
Violet Socks:
Obama even sucks at sucking.
Obama is doing a great job at fundamentally transforming America.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/is-romney-going-to-run-out-of-money
LOL. I can see how Mitt would find it embarrassing.
I think a reasonable stand for donors is to say, Mitt, you need to beat this guy on your own (or on your own dime). If you can’t, then you’re a waste of time.
oh oh backtrack is in trouble now
even obamagirl is unhappy with him
Priorities:
The misspelled insane.
I think I might scream just catching up on news. It’s all bullshit and no one is talking about anything important. It’s like Jersey Shore 100% of the time now.
What is Snooki doing these days, anyway?
Overheard on Valentine’s Day:
I think we’ve all been there. What?
big owies annoucement.
We are going to protest obama’s $37,000 a plate fundraiser.
then you read the article they will be a mile and a half away.
I am sure all the store owners whose business they ruined wished they had stayed a mile and a half away from them.
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/02/15/occupiers-to-protest-obama-35800-per-plate-fundraiser-in-beverly-hills/
Sarah makes a surprise visit to the taping of The Five. should be on tv tomorrow
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/02/15/video-sarah-palin-surprises-co-hosts-during-taping-of-the-five/
OT, the next President of China is meeting with Jeffrey Katzenberg, the single largest individual contributor to Obama’s re-election Super PAC. $2 million from his own pocket before even getting to his bundling activities. China must be happier with Obama than Romney/Santorum on monetary policy, trade, currency, etc. Mainstream media is reporting story as Xi being interested in Katzenberg’s animation studio, lol. He might as well be meeting with Axelrod.