A Nuanced Portrait

George Zimmerman


Reuters:

George Zimmerman: Prelude to a shooting

A pit bull named Big Boi began menacing George and Shellie Zimmerman in the fall of 2009.

The first time the dog ran free and cornered Shellie in their gated community in Sanford, Florida, George called the owner to complain. The second time, Big Boi frightened his mother-in-law’s dog. Zimmerman called Seminole County Animal Services and bought pepper spray. The third time he saw the dog on the loose, he called again. An officer came to the house, county records show.

“Don’t use pepper spray,” he told the Zimmermans, according to a friend. “It’ll take two or three seconds to take effect, but a quarter second for the dog to jump you,” he said.

“Get a gun.”

That November, the Zimmermans completed firearms training at a local lodge and received concealed-weapons gun permits. In early December, another source close to them told Reuters, the couple bought a pair of guns. George picked a Kel-Tec PF-9 9mm handgun, a popular, lightweight weapon.

By June 2011, Zimmerman’s attention had shifted from a loose pit bull to a wave of robberies that rattled the community, called the Retreat at Twin Lakes. The homeowners association asked him to launch a neighborhood watch, and Zimmerman would begin to carry the Kel-Tec on his regular, dog-walking patrol – a violation of neighborhood watch guidelines but not a crime.

Few of his closest neighbors knew he carried a gun – until two months ago.

[...]

The 28-year-old insurance-fraud investigator comes from a deeply Catholic background and was taught in his early years to do right by those less fortunate. He was raised in a racially integrated household and himself has black roots through an Afro-Peruvian great-grandfather – the father of the maternal grandmother who helped raise him.

A criminal justice student who aspired to become a judge, Zimmerman also concerned himself with the safety of his neighbors after a series of break-ins committed by young African-American men.

Though civil rights demonstrators have argued Zimmerman should not have prejudged Martin, one black neighbor of the Zimmermans said recent history should be taken into account.

“Let’s talk about the elephant in the room. I’m black, OK?” the woman said, declining to be identified because she anticipated backlash due to her race. She leaned in to look a reporter directly in the eyes. “There were black boys robbing houses in this neighborhood,” she said. “That’s why George was suspicious of Trayvon Martin.”

[...]

One morning in July 2011, a black teenager walked up to Zimmerman’s front porch and stole a bicycle, neighbors told Reuters. A police report was taken, though the bicycle was not recovered.

But it was the August incursion into the home of Olivia Bertalan that really troubled the neighborhood, particularly Zimmerman. Shellie was home most days, taking online courses towards certification as a registered nurse.

On August 3, Bertalan was at home with her infant son while her husband, Michael, was at work. She watched from a downstairs window, she said, as two black men repeatedly rang her doorbell and then entered through a sliding door at the back of the house. She ran upstairs, locked herself inside the boy’s bedroom, and called a police dispatcher, whispering frantically.

“I said, ‘What am I supposed to do? I hear them coming up the stairs!’” she told Reuters. Bertalan tried to coo her crying child into silence and armed herself with a pair of rusty scissors.

Police arrived just as the burglars – who had been trying to disconnect the couple’s television – fled out a back door. Shellie Zimmerman saw a black male teen running through her backyard and reported it to police.

After police left Bertalan, George Zimmerman arrived at the front door in a shirt and tie, she said. He gave her his contact numbers on an index card and invited her to visit his wife if she ever felt unsafe. He returned later and gave her a stronger lock to bolster the sliding door that had been forced open.

“He was so mellow and calm, very helpful and very, very sweet,” she said last week. “We didn’t really know George at first, but after the break-in we talked to him on a daily basis. People were freaked out. It wasn’t just George calling police … we were calling police at least once a week.”

In September, a group of neighbors including Zimmerman approached the homeowners association with their concerns, she said. Zimmerman was asked to head up a new neighborhood watch. He agreed.


It was such a simple story – literally black and white. A trigger-happy racist vigilante. An innocent young black kid walking home from the store with some candy and a soft drink. Racial profiling and cold-blooded murder.

Then the facts screwed it up.

Whatever else he may be, George Zimmerman is not a caricature. He’s not even “white” as most of us would define it. If he’s white then so is Barack Obama. He is a husband, father and human being. He was a good neighbor. He killed a man, but is he a murderer?

He had good reason to be concerned about crime. The condo community he lived in had seen a wave of burglaries and attempted break-ins. He was one of the victims. Then one night he saw a strange face in the neighborhood. According to Zimmerman’s statement during the 911 call Trayvon Martin was acting suspiciously, so he called the police like he was supposed to do.

Did Zimmerman exercise bad judgment in following Trayvon? Probably. It certainly didn’t work out very well for either of them. But was he acting recklessly or maliciously? I haven’t seen evidence of that.

There are still unanswered questions. What (if anything) was Trayvon doing that made him seem suspicious? Was Zimmerman following Trayvon or chasing him? Why didn’t Trayvon go home (he had a headstart and 90 seconds to travel 70 yards). Who confronted who? Who threw the first punch?

We haven’t seen all the evidence but many minds are already made up. There are some who will continue to insist it was murder. Others will say it was clearly self-defense. But there is also a place between “guilty” and “innocent” called “not proven.”


Jeralyn has more here.

Tom Maguire has his take here.


About these ads

74 Responses

  1. BTW – People keep referring to Trayvon as a child. Meanwhile Angela Corey (the special prosecutor) is prosecuting a 12 year old as an adult in another case.

  2. Afro-Peruvian great-grandfather

    Wait, so George Zimmerman isn’t even “White Hispanic” anymore?

    OT, but you know what else? I’m getting tired of the term “racial profiling” being co-opted in this case to describe Zimmerman’s actions as it cloaks him in some kind of law enforcement/government authority, which he did not have. By its very definition, an act can only be “racial profiling” when it is law enforcement (or some kind of authorized agent of the government) operating in a systematic way to stop/detain a person based solely on race (rather then based on the usual Constitutional requirements of probable cause). Private individuals may act in a racist manner and/or with racist motives, but I don’t think that fairly reaches the definition of “racial profiling.”

  3. Oh, and according to the uncut, full call to the police Zimmerman made that night re: Trayvon Martin Zimmerman said he was “acting suspiciously” because it was raining and he seemed to be “just wandering around.” Zimmerman even said something to the effect like maybe he was on drugs, because appearing to wander around — in the rain — at night — is not normal behavior.

    • Come on… he was just talking on the phone with his sweetie and doing a Gene Kelly impersonation… “just singing the rain, just singing in the rain, what a wonderful feeling, I’m happy again…”.

  4. thanks for the link to Jeralyn. I would not have visited but for this link. It is really throrough and helpful.

    • I’ve come to realize that Jeralyn’s core identity is a defense attorney and that trumps politics for her. I like that, even when it annoyed me during DSK & Assange posts.

    • Both links were good and I especially enjoyed the comments at Tom Maguire’s.

  5. I cannot but think that this entire sorry spectacle is a last hurray of the legacy media as we have known it. We were already aware of the corruption of many of our legal processes and the opportunism of various political elites, but the naked viciousness of the media and their complete inability to even contemplate any kind of objectivity has been hard to stomach. They simply cannot be trusted with any kind of information. The sooner they go bankrupt the better.

  6. Early on, the store clerk was quoted as saying Trayvon paid for the soda, but stole the candy.
    It seems possible he thought he had been caught out and that Zimmerman was going to apprehend him over the theft.. In ‘wandering around’ in the rain, he might have been attempting to throw Zimmerman off his trail… Later reports describe Trayvon as ‘walking home’, Zimmerman described him as ‘wandering about.’
    A subtle difference, but still two very different ways of getting around.

    • Interesting and wouldn’t the 7-11′s security cameras pick up on that ? Surely the body language of a boy about to take a 5 finger discount on some candy? At least a timeline of when he was there, how long he stayed, and when he left. Or, if he was even there at all that evening. Some reports said he was on his way, some said on his way back. I think it was his dad who said he went out for skittles ? Then later reports, dad wasn’t even home?

      So confusing, thanks to the dumbf**k media :P

  7. Words from his introduction to and quotes from the actual song by Tom Lehrer, ‘National Brotherhood Week’, has kept popping up in my head lately. Like for example:

    ‘I’m sure we all agree that we ought to love one another and I know there are people in the world that do not love their fellow human beings and I HATE people like that.’ ;)

    My guess is that Lehrer was so not pc back in the 60s when he wrote this song. But maybe even less so today?

  8. The problem here is the essential problem with “viral lying”, and why it is so effective….once you tell the lie, people believe it, no matter what and it is very difficult to then ascertain the real truth. No matter what stories now come out, Retures or whoever, those who believe that Zimmerman “hunted down Martin like a dog” will not change their minds…the first lie saw to that. What I like most about this post though is the pic… Zimmerman clearly does not look “white”…so much for racial profiling….or as a Latina friend of mine, Hispanic actually, screamed on Facebook the other day….”I am NOT Caucasian!” In the up-coming election it is going to be very difficult to steer around “viral lying”.

    • lol your friend is going to have quite the identity crisis when she learns the difference between race and ethnicity!

  9. this story has been so distorted just to cause racial tension that people will never believe the truth.
    Both families will have long term hurt due to this tragedy but the people who used it to promote their own interests ,will go on to exploit other victims of tragedies.

    • So true! And … before we’re done not only will George Zimmerman, no matter the actual facts, come out of this as a villain, I predict that sooner or later so will Trayvon Martin, as everyone digs into every detail of his young life and, short of facts, makes up stories. Even as he most probably was just your average 17 year old, doing what average 17 year olds do, including the occasional not so smart but in no way serious miscalculations.

      The only ones walking ‘scott free’ are the exploiters and the race baiters.

  10. I really hate the way the media injects itself into some of these cases and makes them high profile. They distort the facts and hype everybody up and manipulate public opinion. Sometimes it’s about politics, but other times I can’t figure out why the media looses it’s flippin mind.

  11. Another thing that struck me: if most people, even those who knew him well, were unaware that George carried a gun, then that sort of means he was not Mr. Macho with a habit of strutting around brandishing a gun at people, now was he?

  12. Are the young black boys/men who perpetrated the break-ins in that neighborhood accountable for Trayvon’s death? That’s what I’m wondering.

    • I have thoughts floating around in my head, sort of a tentative thesis, about how white guilt, rather than white racism, has been more largely responsible for destroying the black community.

      It has to do with feedbacks in a civilized society. Part of what keeps us “in line”, so to speak, re: social behavior is feedback from the larger society around us. If any subculture begins behaving in ways that are detrimental, society around them objects. They get feedback from the larger community that tells them: “This is not okay”.

      White guilt cut off the black community from those normal societal feedbacks. White guilt deprived the black community of what every other community has – a larger society that considers them a part of the whole, and thus has expectations. Anything and everything, no matter how destructive, was either applauded or ignored. Music that celebrated violence and misogyny, attitudes toward education that were insanely counterproductive, embracing of ignorance and belligerence as “keeping it real”… And all the precious little white-guilt apologists smiled and clapped at all the beautiful “authentic blackness”, while the black community got sicker and sicker.

      Human beings are social animals, and we form societies for specific functions. One of those functions is social feedback regarding what is and isn’t destructive to the whole. White guilt, much more so than white racism, shoved the black community into an isolated, infantilizing bubble that left them cut off from the social fabric, and denied them what the rest of us the have benefit of – honest feedback from our larger community.

      • Aka the soft bigotry of low expectations. I think that is part of it.

        • Yeah, that’s some of it, but there is a bigger picture. It’s also the outright celebration of things that are destructive to the black community as a whole, that the white-guilt society engages in. It’s beyond low expectations – it’s cheering thuggery and violence and aversion to school and the degradation of women (because it’s white boys buying all those CD’s too, you know), and the decline in family structure, as some sort of “authenticity.” It’s insidious, and it’s fucking cruel.

        • ITA, WMCB. Great comment.

          I was bused to a black high school back in the busing heyday of the 70s. I’ll never forget during our government class final exam that all the black kids were asked to leave the room. The rest of us, dumbfounded, asked the teacher why. It turned out they were not taking the written test along with the rest of us. They were being given a special oral test. Much of the class was annoyed and there were lots of “that’s not fair” type of comments. But all I could think was how horrible it must have made those black kids feel to be shooed out of the classroom because it had been decided they weren’t smart enough to take the test the white kids were taking.

          Oftentimes I read the white guilters angry hissy fits they pass off as “commentary,” and I’m left wondering if they even know any people of color. For one thing, they seem to view POC as one big, homogenous thing, not individuals who bring distinct, personal experiences to the table. And they wear their white guilt as a fetish-like talisman of a superiority and grace they come nowhere near obtaining. IMO, they are the perfect example of one of the most insidious forms of r@cism in our culture today.

      • So I guess you could say that I agree that whites are at least partly responsible for the problems in the black community. But not in the way they think.

      • Interesting, WMCB. I think that could be a big part of it. Additionally, I think there is some insulation from the social feedback provided by leaders like Al Sharpton. They provide cover and accusations, blaming the behavior on causes beyond a bad choice made by a perpetrator.

        Leaders like Al Sharpton never say, “Wow, robbing that store while pretending to hold a gun in your pocket? That was a really bad decision YOU made!”

        Probably anyone who has spent time with kids knows that kids will try to blame their friends for choices they make. We have to train them to understand that they alone are responsible for the actions they take. Maybe this blaming behavior on society is part of the infantilizing you mentioned.

        • Yes, the race-pimpers feed into it. I’m still pondering, trying to get my thoughts around what’s in the corner of my mind’s eye.

          Because it’s more than just making excuses, or not holding people accountable. I have no problem with taking hard looks at how poverty,
          historical racism, etc play into what has happened to the black community.

          It’s more about the deification and celebration of things that are demonstrably harmful as authentically black. It’s the misguided guilt that led whites to assign and reinforce a warped racial identity to black people that never would have naturally developed outside of that guilt dynamic in the larger society, that knee-jerk response to applaud any and every thing that was “black”, lest we be dissing someone’s “culture”.

          We’ve long examined how white racism has had far-reaching detrimental effect. Are we brave enough to face how much white guilt has also had far-reaching detrimental effect?

          Still thinking.

        • What you’re noticing is the shift we’ve made in our culture, brought about by the conceptualization of things like “cool.”

          “Cool” is a cultural killer because it gives people a reason/excuse for liking things without ever having to investigate the purpose of the object of affection, or the consequences of liking it. It being “cool” is enough, but it operates like a call to lemmings at the edge of a cliff.

          The shift has had a profound impact on the black community, but it’s a tool at work in the culture at large, and it’s part and parcel of a cultural hegemony the left has been perpetrating for a long time, like way before the Civil War. It’s ironic that Al Gore’s book is called “the Assault on Reason” considering his side is the most formidable foe reason has. Way more deadly than the right, which to be fair has it’s own problems.

          Anyway, what we have now is a group of people who are unconsciously opposed to didactisism, which is the predominant way we’ve transferred knowledge for well on 3,000 years. Now we have concepts like “cool” and “art for art’s sake” and we have whole generations who don’t want to be told what to do or what worked in the past because they’ve been taught, and are stupid enough to believe, that they can do anything and reinvent the world from whole cloth just by rejecting authority.

          In short, it’s the dominant boomer mindset that won the day, and we are seeing the consequences of it in action. In truth, they were no better or inventive than their fathers and mothers, they just thought they were.

        • Anyway, what we have now is a group of people who are unconsciously opposed to didacticism, which is the predominant way we’ve transferred knowledge for well on 3,000 years

          That’s it exactly, and IMO one of the ways the Left lost me. The liberals that I always admired and emulated were products of The Enlightenment. They elevated Reason.

          So much of “Critical X Theory” anymore, whether it be regarding race, or feminism, or art, or education, or whatever, has completely divorced itself from the legacy of the enlightenment, and from its forbears in classic philosophy. Feelings and self image are more important than facts. Intentions are the key, not demonstrable effects.

          It’s all ivory tower blathering, which is then dispensed to the masses in simplified form, attached to some emotional hook or other, with very little regard for real effects in the real world.

      • So perceptive and interesting…as usual. Don’t know if you post at JWS, but would so love to hear you discuss more of your ideas on his radio show sometime. Really.

        • I might sometime. I’m going to do some research. Because it seems to me, just observing societal dynamics, that white guilt is just as culpable for the “othering” of the black community as racism is.

          And if that’s true, then the black community got double-whammyed. They got hit with racism, then got hit with a “cure” that was just as sick and twisted in its eventual effects as the racism was.

        • That is true. I think we’ve established that with our discussions of the history of welfare in America, as well as certain Civil Rights discussions we’ve had. There’s a clear trajectory of the same political group of people talking for and acting on behalf of black Americans to often disastrous consequences throughout our history. It’s always the same “progressive” group, from the abolition movement to the Civil War to Civil Rights.

          Remember that slavery was once practiced all over the United States as it was then known, and it didn’t end in the NE with a bunch of white people voluntarily giving up “their property.” Most did not take a financial hit, as most Northern slaves either bought their own freedom, or in some cases states reimbursed “owners” for voluntary dissolution of human property.

          Personally, I think Dems took ownership of the Civil Rights issue because they were afraid they would lose control of the status quo if they didn’t. They co-opted the feminist movement for the same reasons. I know for a fact that there was a lot of discussion then, as there is now, about the pending implosion of the black birth rate (the boom didn’t just happen in white America). Charlie Manson didn’t get that race war stuff from no where. People talked about it in the 60s like they talked about eugenics in the 1920s.

          It’s always the same concerns by the same entitled, over-privileged group of stakeholders who don’t want too many interlopers clogging up their schools and career choices, or taking too much control of the reigns of power. Their policies are designed to continue the exclusion of the masses, while being able to hold up a select few as evidence that their programs and policies work. That’s how cultural hegemony is perpetrated.

          Great discussion here today. Sorry for rambling.

      • I can’t wait to read what your research reveals. Has anyone really studied the ramifications of “white guilt” upon the black community? This would make an excellent book as well. But what publisher would touch it?

        • I’m sure that there must be some authors much more educated than myself who have explored the idea. One of the drawbacks of being relatively uneducated is that there is a lot out there that I don’t know about. I’m going to look and see.

          People without formal educations, like myself, are second to no one in the ability to think and reason. Our minds work just as well as anyone’s, and sometimes better. I have no problem understanding, breaking down, and critiquing complex concepts, once I apply myself to them.

          But I’ll be the first to admit that one of the disadvantages of no formal education is what I call “gaps” in my knowledge. Not my intelligence, but my knowledge. Auto-didacts like myself study this or that as the interest strikes, but sometimes are unfamiliar with books or ideas that “every college-educated person knows”.

        • But I’ll be the first to admit that one of the disadvantages of no formal education is what I call “gaps” in my knowledge.

          You also were not required to read reams of horseshit because some pointy-headed perfesser considered it “classic.”

        • Auto-didacts like myself study this or that as the interest strikes, but sometimes are unfamiliar with books or ideas that “every college-educated person knows.”

          Rather what “every college-educated person used to know.” A college education ain’t what it used to be.

  13. OT tweets & pics that Moscow is getting some kind of ash cloud.
    https://twitter.com/#!/search/moscow

  14. “He is a husband, father and human being…”

    I read these article at night and miss all the details – is he really a father? I am still not seeing it.

    Re: “Yeah, that’s some of it, but there is a bigger picture. It’s also the outright celebration of things that are destructive to the black community as a whole, that the white-guilt society engages in.”

    Not just the black community. One of the epic tirades I read denounced Hollywood for promoting a whole Jack Nicholson/ Easy Rider/Rebel Without A Cause lifestyle (or a Murphy Brown unwed mother lifestyle which works fine for college kids with a solid education and a solid support system but is a disaster for the high school kid who drops out and follows the Dead for a year because he thinks he’s Jack.

    By way of controversial example – Bill Ayers is a pillar of Chicago society today despite his controversial youth; having a rich, powerful dad helped him in a way not available to lots of other wanna-bes.

    Well – my son had just seen The Departed. He was disappointed to learn that Matt Damon was a faux-Southy but horrified to find out just how authentic Mark Wahlberg actually is in the role of punk tough-guy.

    Which I guess suggests redemption is always a possibility, so I will close with that.

    • is he really a father?

      My bad. I corrected my post.

    • Bill Ayers is a pillar of Chicago society today despite his controversial youth; having a rich, powerful dad helped him in a way not available to lots of other wanna-bes.

      Yep. That’s also been one of my beefs with OWS. The academia who helped organize, or those whose careers run in activist circles, can wear getting arrested like a badge of honor, as can the vapid trust fund babies who will go be a well-paid “consultant” to some lefty non-profit.

      The poor kid who needs to get into a tech school to learn welding, and get a blue-collar job, is going to get a very different reaction to having an “assaulting police” conviction on his record. But they throw those kids out front like fodder.

  15. GAH !! How dare she, what makes her think she, could. even. think. she could follow in Hillary’s footsteps, but this is good to know…..

    http://news.yahoo.com/president-michelle-obama-absolutely-not-190119031–abc-news-politics.html

    /rant

  16. Biden say Obama “has a big stick.”
    http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/04/26/Biden-I-Promise-You-The-President-Has-A-Big-Stick

    I assume he meant to say that Obama is a giant dick.

  17. Taylor Marsh, reading the same Reuters article:

    Trayvon Martin represents the lightning strike in the middle of a perfect storm that begins with George Zimmerman’s life and his inability to deal with his own anger.

    Following Trayvon Martin was wrong and Zimmerman was told not to pursue, which bears repeated reminding.

    Targeting a person while carrying a weapon, with no crime having been committed and no suspicious activity involved to alarm, is felonious intent to play judge and jury of a man, because of other events that have no relation and can only be decided by law enforcement.

    Zimmerman’s multicultural background is interesting, which a jury will consider, if this gets beyond the Stand Your Ground hearing, with the case allowed to go forward.

    The fact remains that with the neighborhood robberies allegedly committed by African Americans as background information, George Zimmerman’s overblown sense of vigilantism pushed him to follow the black man wearing a hoodie.

    There was no action by Trayvon Martin to warrant George Zimmerman tailing him, let alone pulling the trigger and ending his life.

    • This is so ridiculous. It is neither illegal nor unusual for neighborhood watch persons to follow someone to see where they are going.

      It is not “targeting”. And it is certainly not “felonious intent to play judge and jury”. Neighborhood watchpersons follow people in neighborhoods every day in this country. It’s kind of what they do.

      Clue to the idiots of the world: Carrying a gun does not make one violent, or a monster, or just itching to use it. Carrying a gun does not suddenly make otherwise benign actions sinister merely by virtue of the existence of the gun. ZOMG!! He has a GUN!! He must be wanting to shoot someone!

      Pleeease. In fact, it’s quite the opposite of her irrational fears. Millions of Americans carry legal guns in this country. Those people are less likely to commit a violent crime than others. The violent crime rate of legal concealed carriers is MASSIVELY lower than the general population. The stats have shown this over and over and over. Someone carrying a legal handgun is one of the least likely to ever hurt a soul.

      • Sorry – fucked up my tags.

      • A gun also does not protect you from harm. It is entirely possible that had Zimmerman been sufficiently incapacitated, Martin could have killed him before he could draw a weapon. As far as no action warranting a shooting, I can think of one. If Trayvon Martin was reaching for the gun or had his hand on it, there is all the reason in the world to shoot him first.

      • I guess I should confess that I would probably have acted just like George Zimmerman if I saw something suspicious in my neighborhood. In fact I have.

        I have walked up to a strange guy wandering in the parking lot of my apartment complex and asked him if he lived there. When he said “No, I’m just waiting for someone” I told him to wait somewhere else. I did the same to a guy loitering in the alley next to my apartment (a different one). Both times it was fairly late at night. One morning I chased a guy I saw trying the doors on my neighbor’s car. In each of those cases I was unarmed.

        When I was working uniform security I worked apartment complexes on several occasions. I also worked parking lot security at events. My job was to check out anything suspicious. Usually I would walk right up to people and ask them if they needed assistance. I worked both armed and unarmed, but never needed to pull a weapon.

        Last week I rang my neighbor’s doorbell at midnight to tell her that her garage door was wide open.

        • And guess what? Contrary to the “He had not right to follow Martin! That means he killed him with premeditation” meme, a private citizen doesn’t need “probable cause” to do anything. That is why I don’t like the co-opting of the term “racial profiling” (as I wrote above) when discussing Zimmerman’s actions toward Martin — it implies he had some obligation of having probably cause to view Martin as “suspicious” when he didn’t.

      • I seem to recall Taylor Marsh writing a piece on all the guns her husband has during the 2008 primary when the Obots were slamming Hillary for sending out a flier with what appeared to be a left-handed rifle (the Obots were saying such things didn’t exist; Taylor was defending Hillary based on her “expertise’ of guns — of course this was all before Taylor became an Obot herself). So I guess, by her reasoning, her husband, big gun owner that he is, is violent & just itching to kill someone.

    • Could someone tell me the statute pertaining to “felonious intent to play judge and jury of a man?”

    • Taylor’s got the Sharpton narrative down pat, good little Obot that she is :(

    • is felonious intent to play judge and jury of a man,

      I’m not quite sure I remember learning about “felonious intent to play judge and jury of a man” in law school. However, I find it quite ironic that she (and many, many others across the intertubes) seeks to condemn Zimmerman for allegedly doing the exact same thing she is clearly doing to him.

      I’m highly relieved that charges were finally brought against Zimmerman, as I’m confident evidentiary standards in court will be higher than that of the MSM & the internet. You would have thought after the Casey Anthony debacle, which left the blogosphere flailing & sputtering in disbelieve that you needed more than “she’s a slut with a tattoo” to get a murder conviction, that these morons would have learned something about buying into MSM hype and/or cautioned them on opining about legal standards of which they are completely unfamiliar. But apparently not.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 273 other followers

%d bloggers like this: