Better luck next time


Rangers Fan Cries After Couple Snags Foul Ball

Rangers first baseman Mitch Moreland tried doing something nice for the fans in the middle of the eighth inning on Wednesday by tossing a foul ball into the stands. The ball was scooped up by a man who handed it to his female companion. The couple was all smiles, but the small child seated with his parents nearby was visibly distraught.

The young Rangers fan started crying as the couple next to them began posing for pictures with the foul ball.

As the YES Network cameras captured the scene, Michael Kay reacted first by saying worse things could happen. But then he ripped the couple for not giving the ball to the kid once he saw the replay.

“Oh my God they can’t give it to the kid? They’re actually like rubbing it in the kid’s face. Very cold,” he said.

Luckily, someone in the Rangers dugout noticed and gave the kid another ball.

WTF?

It’s not like they snatched the ball away from the kid.

I’ve been going to Giants games since I was a little boy. I never caught a foul ball (or homer) and nobody ever gave me one either.

If I ever do catch one why should I feel obligated to give it to somebody else’s rugrat? The snot-nosed little brat will probably trash it anyway. I’ll put it on the shelf next to my Humm-Baby kazoo and Croix de Candlestick.

Not only did the kid get his own ball out of the deal, but today the team announced they were giving him a jersey autographed by the whole team. Throwing tantrums does pay-off.

BTW: I always take my glove with me to games just in case.

This is an open thread.

This is some serious stink-eye:



He’s making a list and checking it twice

Off with their heads!


Joe Moneybags Gazette:

Try this thought experiment: You decide to donate money to Mitt Romney. You want change in the Oval Office, so you engage in your democratic right to send a check.

Several days later, President Barack Obama, the most powerful man on the planet, singles you out by name. His campaign brands you a Romney donor, shames you for “betting against America,” and accuses you of having a “less-than-reputable” record. The message from the man who controls the Justice Department (which can indict you), the SEC (which can fine you), and the IRS (which can audit you), is clear: You made a mistake donating that money.

Are you worried?

Richard Nixon’s “enemies list” appalled the country for the simple reason that presidents hold a unique trust. Unlike senators or congressmen, presidents alone represent all Americans. Their powers—to jail, to fine, to bankrupt—are also so vast as to require restraint. Any president who targets a private citizen for his politics is de facto engaged in government intimidation and threats. This is why presidents since Nixon have carefully avoided the practice.

Save Mr. Obama, who acknowledges no rules. This past week, one of his campaign websites posted an item entitled “Behind the curtain: A brief history of Romney’s donors.” In the post, the Obama campaign named and shamed eight private citizens who had donated to his opponent. Describing the givers as all having “less-than-reputable records,” the post went on to make the extraordinary accusations that “quite a few” have also been “on the wrong side of the law” and profiting at “the expense of so many Americans.”

These are people like Paul Schorr and Sam and Jeffrey Fox, investors who the site outed for the crime of having “outsourced” jobs. T. Martin Fiorentino is scored for his work for a firm that forecloses on homes. Louis Bacon (a hedge-fund manager), Kent Burton (a “lobbyist”) and Thomas O’Malley (an energy CEO) stand accused of profiting from oil. Frank VanderSloot, the CEO of a home-products firm, is slimed as a “bitter foe of the gay rights movement.”

These are wealthy individuals, to be sure, but private citizens nonetheless. Not one holds elected office. Not one is a criminal. Not one has the barest fraction of the position or the power of the U.S. leader who is publicly assaulting them.


Once again Obama earns the adjectives “historic” and “unprecedented.”

The Obots will be clapping with glee but they only care about tribal wins and losses. The OWSers will be crowing about beating up on the 1%ers but I guess they never heard of Martin Niemöller:

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn’t a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.


Power that is not guided by principle is a bad thing.

(h/t Lola-at-Large)


New Obama ad: “I killed Bin Laden!”


Seriously.

3 1/2 years in office and that’s all he has to brag about?


The mob rules!


Dr. Boyce Watkins of Syracuse University at Huffpoop:

George Zimmerman Bail Reverses All Hard Work Done for Trayvon Martin

What do you do when your municipality is holding arguably the most-hated and notorious killer on earth? You grant him bail. That’s exactly what Judge Kenneth Lester did for George Zimmerman, the man who killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

As a condition of his bail, Zimmerman is not allowed to have possession of firearms, drink alcohol, or use drugs. He must also maintain a curfew. How nice.

If the city of Sanford wanted to embarrass itself any further, it just did.

The justice system that has obtained international prominence as one of the most inept, irresponsible, racist and unprofessional organizations in the country has set a new standard for judicial indecency. The family of Trayvon Martin worked hard to get Zimmerman arrested because he was a flight risk, now he’s a flight risk all over again.

Granting bail for George Zimmerman, for the most part, is a slap in the face to those around the world who worked for his arrest. It simply says that without regard to the will of the people, those possessing the power of the state have no obligation to answer to anyone or even share whatever information they are using to come to their illogical decisions.

Granting bail to Zimmerman renders all the rallies, petitions and hard work done around the world to bring him to justice meaningless. It effectively communicates defiance within the Sanford judicial system to say, “We don’t care what you think. We’re going to do whatever we choose to do.”

At this point, it’s hard to argue against anyone who feels compelled to hold the city of Sanford accountable for its actions. Boycotts, (peaceful) civil disobedience, and other tools at our disposal are called for when it comes to dealing with this tragedy of a judicial process. George Zimmerman himself should not be tried in the court of public opinion, but the public deserves answers to ensure that this son of a judge who’s been allowed to skirt responsibility for his actions in the past, isn’t being given yet another free ride by one of his father’s friends.

George Zimmerman may or may not be guilty of second-degree murder in the death of Trayvon Martin. But when accused of racial inequality, disrespect for the law, and stomping on the civil rights of its citizens, the Sanford judicial system has been found guilty beyond measure.

The same system that let a killer walk away from the scene of the crime and held a boy’s body in the morgue long after his parents filed a missing person’s report, is the one that is now allowing George Zimmerman to walk the streets with the rest of us.

This is what Sanford justice is all about, and it is a reminder that we cannot simply sit back and let the system take its course.


In case you were wondering, no, Dr. Watkins does not teach law. What is it about these people with finance and economics degrees? I think all those numbers must kill brain cells. I would be embarrassed to take any class from someone so woefully ignorant, especially at a university as prestigious as Syracuse.

Let’s start with the factual errors. The City of Sanford did not grant bail to George Zimmerman. That decision was made by a circuit court judge employed by Seminole County. There is no “Sanford judicial system.” This case is in the jurisdiction of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit.

The investigation into the death of Trayvon Martin was originally handled by the City of Sanford Police Department. Due to media attention and public pressure, the case was taken over by a special prosecutor appointed by the governor. That prosecutor is Angela Corey, the State Attorney in Florida’s Fourth Judicial Circuit Court.

George Zimmerman did not simply walk away from the crime scene. He was the focus of a continuing investigation. He was questioned at length on several occasions, including an four hour interrogation on the night of the killing. The police notified Trayvon’s father of his son’s death at 8 am the following morning. Trayvon’s body was autopsied the next day after the killing and was held an additional couple of days as a courtesy until funeral arrangements were made by the family.

Our legal system is based upon the presumption of innocence. The 8th Amendment is the shortest amendment and states:

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.


In Florida as in all the other states, the amount of bail is determined by a judge after the consideration of certain factors. These include the seriousness of the offense charged, the danger to the community, the risk of flight and the strength of the evidence. The opinion of a lynch mob is irrelevant.

The judge in this case determined that Zimmerman was not a flight risk. He has longstanding ties to the community, his family lives in the area, he voluntarily surrendered his passport, he stayed in contact with the police and he had turned himself in when charges were filed.

Dr. Watkins admits that George Zimmerman should not be tried in the court of public opinion but that is precisely what he is demanding. The “court of public opinion” is simply another term for mob rule. And when the mob is made up of people like Dr. Watkins, injustice is the only possible outcome. One of the Huffpoop commenters said it best:

Watch a Western film some time, Professor. The people who storm the jail in a mob action aren’t the heroes.


UPDATE:

Media attorneys due in court in Zimmerman case

Attorneys for the Orlando Sentinel, WFTV-Channel 9, NBC, CNN, The New York Times and other media companies are to be in court today fighting for access to records in the George Zimmerman case, but today’s fight may not be a long one.

Some of what they’re demanding was released Monday, a week after they made their requests. Those are the records in Zimmerman’s court file, such things as his written plea of not guilty and a request by his lawyer that an earlier judge step aside because of a potential conflict of interest.

Another set of much-sought-after records may be another, bigger fight. Those are the ones collected by the special prosecutor and spelling out what evidence she has against Zimmerman.

[...]

Two weeks ago, Zimmerman’s lawyer formally asked Special Prosecutor Angela Corey to provide the records by today, a deadline she is required by law to meet.

Once she provides them to him, they’re public records, meaning they should be available to anyone who asks for them.

But the day after Zimmerman’s arrest, defense attorney Mark O’Mara asked that those records be sealed, and Corey’s trial lawyer, Bernie de la Rionda, agreed, and so did Seminole County Judge Mark Herr.

But on Thursday, Corey’s office indicated it was preparing to release them to the public.

It’s not clear whether the case’s new judge, Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester Jr., will listen to arguments today about those prosecution records.


If those records are released, we’ll know everything the prosecution knows.



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 273 other followers