I’ve tried to stay above the fray, but this fucking “slander” quote has me in a FB war with my Obot friends. Gaaaah … please hurry up election so I can just cast my vote and get this over with.
don’t worry about your FB “friends”…they are what they are and, trust me, you won’t change their narrow mindedness…
and they defend this HOW? Have they even heard of the Constitution and Freedom of Speech? This is getting more and more bizarre by the day.
Well … pretty feeble defense in the end. They tried to explain “what Obama really meant (WORM!!!)” was to make a statement about religious intolerance. Then I slammed them right back with questions about why does he continue to link the Embassy deaths to that video (when it’s patently obvious it was a terrorist attack on our Embassy on 9/11)? What’s slanderous about the stupid video anyway? What about our right to free speech? Then *crickets* from most, but one did comment that she found the speech “disconcerting.” I’ll take that as a win! No one defriended, and hopefully they are asking themselves why they keep defending him.
My obot friends on FB are being unusually quiet.
I had to delete my facebook
Muhammad really was a baby-raper.
According to the traditional sources, Aisha was six or seven years old when she was betrothed to Muhammad and nine when the marriage was consummated. Aisha stayed in her parents’ home for several years until she joined Muhammad and the marriage was consummated when she was nine. However, al-Tabari records that she was ten. The sources do not offer much more information about Aisha’s childhood years, but mention that after the wedding, she continued to play with her toys, and that Muhammad entered into the spirit of these games.
The issue of Aisha’s age at the time she was married to Muhammad has been of interest since the earliest days of Islam, and references to her age by early historians are frequent. American historian Denise Spellberg states that “these specific references to the bride’s age reinforce Aisha’s pre-menarcheal status and, implicitly, her virginity.” Early Muslims regarded Aisha’s youth as demonstrating her virginity and therefore her suitability as a bride of Muhammad. This issue of her virginity was of great importance to those who supported Aisha’s position in the debate of the succession to Muhammad. These supporters considered that as Muhammad’s only virgin wife, Aisha was divinely intended for him, and therefore the most credible regarding the debate. According to Spellberg, historians who supported Aisha’s position in the debate of the succession to Muhammad against Shi’a claims considered her youth, and therefore her purity, to be of paramount importance.
Then its not slander.
Can you even slander the dead? I don’t think so.
angie, that was my first thought. Can you even slander the dead? WTF?
He had 11 wives, he was into thigh humping. He took slaves, other men’s wives. Whenever doubt was shed on his actions he’d just write another surah giving him permission to do what he was doing.
He was a creep, a pervert and a pedophile. Marrying a 6 year old girl and consumating the marriage when she was just 9. There are portions in the Koran supposedly contributed by Aisha which speak of her playing with dolls and her friends while Mohammed watched and did what he wanted.
It is disgusting.
“Whenever doubt was shed on his actions he’d just write another surah giving him permission to do what he was doing.”
No wonder Obama defends him. Just sayin’
yes he was , a “sacred ” baby raper pedophile
Here’s that paragraph.
“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied. Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims, and Shiite pilgrims. It is time to heed the words of Gandhi: “Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit.” Together, we must work towards a world where we are strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them. That is what America embodies, and that is the vision we will support.”
Not a peep from this White House about “Piss Christ”
Far more important he appear as “eye candy” on The View.
“Eye solvent” is more apt. Gawd, but I do not understand how such an ugly person could be so enamored of his own reflection.
Here is Mitt at Clinton Global Initiative
and they all sat together on “The View”….now that was a disgusting group of people…a real view into the minds of intolerance and bigotry…and self-admiration….
And he said that we should shun the video to marginalize it. Time to increase the view numbers:
Are the vile progs even smart enough to realize that anyone who denies Islam as being the one true religion is “slandering” the prophet?
Obama can kiss my ass, too.
The AP clip of Obama speaking at the UN stops just before he says the stuff about baby-raper Mo.
Another Obama quote from today:
“It will not be enough to put more guards in front of an embassy.”
You didn’t even try, asshat.
The bots are whining that he added the caveats about descrating Christ, etc.
In a word, bullshit.
1) The POTUS has no business condemning religious blasphemy of any sort, regardless. Period. He ESPECIALLY has no business doing it when certain people are murdering and rioting over “blasphemy”. The people demanding that their faith CANNOT be criticized, and pushing laws terrorizing and murdering to intimidate nations into passing those laws, are NOT Christians or Hindus or Buddhists.
2) That caveat is a throwaway. It’s like saying “Homosexual men should not marry homosexual men. Neither should heterosexual men marry heterosexual men.”
It’s a fucking false equivalency, because the latter is not happening, and isn’t even an issue. You’re throwing that in there to paper over your bullshit.
As an atheist, I reserve my god-given right to slander any fucking prophet I want.
As an American Catholic- I defend your right to slander any religious figure, institution or prophet you want!
We are grown ups, we can take it! Hell, sometimes it really really helps to criticize the hell out them- it’s the only way to move them out of their antiquated traditions that fly in the face of truths.
(and I’m not an atheist!)
Bravo Allen West!
“My statement to the United Nations would have been, “The future does not belong to those who attack our Embassies and Consulates and kill our Ambassadors. The Angel of Death in the form of an American Bald Eagle will visit you and wreak havoc and destruction upon your existence”
Seems infidelphobes need sme heavy immersion therapy to get over their irrational fear. MUHAMMED IS A FILTHY CHILD-RAPING DOG. #TeamSlander— (@FormerDeminTX) September 25, 2012
Yikes! Whoever pulls the Puppet Obama’s strings is tone deaf to American tradition and values. Will this even resonate with the Ivy indoctrinated crowd? This speech is so weird people don’t know what to do or say about it. I know this, I want to see how Hannity and O’Riley go after it. Also what will American Jews think of this?
Don’t worry — MSM will ignore it.
I don’t think the MSM can ignore it, They were so freaked out that Clinton was standing up with Romney talking nice about him this morning that they kept alluding to Obama’s big speech so their viewers are already in on it. I really think that even the memorizing and regurgitating Ivy indoctrinated would find this speech wrong if not dangerous. Since they love and idolize Obama they have to be wondering what drug is that guy on or has he had a stroke, is there something we should be doing to get him help?
Well, then I’m sure they will spin it as “no big deal” and put it “in context” about religious tolerance — you know, lie their asses off supporting a curtailment of the First Amendment.
angienc, you are right,
CNN breaking news: “Obama confronts Syria and Iran in UN address. Obama honors slain ambassador Chris Stevens in sweeping address to UN.
MSNBC, “Obama denounces violence in Middle East, calls for tolerance and democracy”
angienc, you are right,
Yeah — if everyone could just keep that in their head as a given, we’d save a lot of time.
Navy SEAL explains the continuing islamic threat to our nation
PLEASE WATCH THIS
You can’t make this stuff up: Madonna calls Obama a “black Muslim,” calls for fans to vote for him. 1:57 mark on the video.
Fuck her, too.
She’s become a first class weirdo.
IMO, must be the Botox
She really has. Those twitchy eyes were quite creepy.
I invite her to go and live in Afghanistan- see how far she gets with her outfits. See how she likes her new hefty bag wardrobe.
I invite her to go ahead and give a concert, in her usual garb- for the imams.
She has no idea what she’s saying…really dumb voter!
Madge will tell you that she knows what she sees. snicker
when she was in her happy hooker stage, she would play at madison square garden and all the teeney boppers would come to see her dressed like junior happy hookers. then she got married and had a kid and all of a sudden her kids were not going to be exposed to anyone who acted as she did. so it way Hooray for my kids i will be a good role model, tough about your kids i made money dressing like a hooker and did not care what kind of a role model I was.
I have never liked her and that was the main reason
The United States of America: proudly legalizing blasphemy since 1787.— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) September 25, 2012
No, he wasn’t ever a goat-fucker, but was definitely a pedophile (in current terminology). Yeah, most secular and atheist folks don’t differentiate Islam from other major religions. But on the whole, Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism all preach love, although they don’t shy away from inherent conflict. But Islam is very different. Its based on war and conflict. This is just my personal experience.
My bad. Mohammed only BLOWS goats. He fucks pigs. And he’s a baby-raper in any terminology.
Btw, you know why Obama did his giant “Muḥammadur rasūlu l-Lāh” dogwhistle of a pander today. It’s because Morsi and Ahmadinejad and the rest of the Boys From The Crazy Hood are going to call fro international blasphemy laws tomorrow and Brother Barack just gave them his salaam.
On Yom Ki[ppur no less.
Yeah. That is just topping on the cake for them.
David Burge @iowahawkblog
The First Amendment is incompatible with your religion? Then get another religion.
HONK HONK HONK!!!!!
Spanish Company Will “Count” American Votes Overseas In November
APRIL 10, 2012 BY DOUG BOOK
this should be interesting. love to know what is in there
Well, looks like some Dem Jewish leaders are waking up:
NY post reports: Brooklyn Democratic Assemblyman Dov Hikind will cross party lines to back Mitt Romney for president. Hikind, who has pull among Orthodox Jews, said he’s fed up with the way President Obama has treated Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as the Jewish state deals with threats from Iran.
The assemblyman said his backing of Romney will be more than lip service. He has offered to stump across the country.
“Florida. Pennsylvania. Wherever Romney needs need me, I’ll be there,” Hikind said.
Arguing that Obama has been a bad president, Hikind said he was particularly infuriated that the president couldn’t find the time to meet with Netanyahu during the UN conference but has schmoozed with celebrities at New York fund-raisers.