When Did The Tea Party Admit They Were Racist?


Daily Caller:

Former NAACP head: Tea party ‘admittedly racist,’ ‘Taliban wing of American politics’

On Tuesday’s broadcast of Thomas Robert’s 11 a.m. MSNBC program, NAACP President Emeritus Julian Bond defended the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of tea party groups, which he described as “admittedly racist.”

“I think it’s entirely legitimate to look at the tea party,” said Bond, whose group was audited by the IRS during the Bush administration. “I mean, here are a group of people who are admittedly racist, who are overtly political, who’ve tried as best they can to harm President Obama in every way they can. I don’t think there are correct parallels between these incidents. It was wrong for the IRS to behave in this heavy-handed manner. They didn’t explain it well before or now what they’re doing and why they’re doing it. But there are no parallels between these two.”

Roberts asked Bond if he thought these revelations might revive the tea party, which has seen its influence decline since the 2010 midterm elections.

“I hope not,” he replied. “I hope they don’t get any more air. You know, they are the Taliban wing of American politics and we all ought to be a little worried about them.”

Roberts asked if comparing the tea party to the Taliban was “a little harsh,” but Bond declined to back off his remarks.

“Not at all — the truth may hurt, but it’s the truth,” Bond said.


Maybe I was drunk that day, but I don’t recall the Tea Party admitting they were racist. Anybody got a link on that?

This story is really disappointing. When a prominent civil rights leader endorses denying someone their civil rights it is very disturbing. Freedom of speech and freedom of association are both civil rights. So is the right to equal protection under the law.

I don’t believe that the Tea Party is racist, even if some of their members probably are. Put together a large group of people and you’ll find a few nutjobs in the mix. Even if they were, racism is odious but it’s not illegal.

The government cannot discriminate based on ideology or viewpoint. As long as they break no laws we have to tolerate people and groups whose beliefs we find disgusting. When they break the law we punish those specific offenses and no more.

I am really sick of the notion that freedom and civil rights are only for people we agree with. I hope Bond’s comments do not represent a new, “non-defensive” use of the race card.


I’m Pretty Sure The Guy Who Wrote This Is A Racist

Toure


Walter E. Williams:

Honest Examination of Race

One definition given for insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results; it might also be a definition of stupidity. Let’s look at some cities where large percentages of black Americans live under poor conditions.

Experiencing a violent crime rate of 2,137 per 100,000 of the population, Detroit is the nation’s most dangerous city. Rounding out Forbes magazine’s 2012 list of the 10 most dangerous cities are St Louis; Oakland, Calif.; Memphis, Tenn.; Birmingham, Ala.; Atlanta; Baltimore; Stockton, Calif.; Cleveland; and Buffalo, N.Y. The most common characteristic of these predominantly black cities is that for decades, all of them have been run by Democratic and presumably liberal administrations. Some cities – such as Detroit, Buffalo, Newark, N.J., and Philadelphia – haven’t elected a Republican mayor for more than a half-century. What’s more is that in most of these cities, blacks have been mayors, chiefs of police, school superintendents and principals and have dominated city councils.

You might ask, “What’s the point, Williams?” Let’s be clear about it. I’m not stating that there’s a causal relationship between crime, poverty and squalor on the one hand and, on the other, Democratic and black political control over a city. Nor am I saying that blacks ought to vote Republican. What I am saying is that if one is strategizing on how to improve the lives of the poorest black people, he wants to leave off his to-do list election of Democrats and black politicians. Also to be left off the to-do list is a civil rights agenda. Racial discrimination has little to do with major problems confronting black people.

Today 72 percent of black babies are born out of wedlock. Being born and finding out that your mother is 17 years old, that your grandmother is 35 and that you don’t know who or where your father is is not a good start on life. In fact, it’s a near guarantee for school dropout, poverty and crime, but such a start in life has nothing to do with racial discrimination.

Law-abiding poor black people suffer the nation’s highest rates of criminal victimization from assaults and homicide. More than 50 percent of homicide victims are black. Would anyone claim that this victimization is caused by racist groups preying on the black community? In addition to victimization, the level of lawlessness in many black communities has the full effect of a law banning economic growth. That’s because the thugs are equal-opportunity thugs who will rip off a black-owned business just as they’d rip off a white-owned business.

Black education is a disaster, but who runs the violent, disruptive big-city schools, where education is all but impossible? For the most part, it’s not white people. Go to a city such as Detroit and you’ll find that blacks have been superintendents, principals and most of the teachers for years. Most black high-school students, in Detroit and other cities, can’t read, write and compute as well as sixth-, seventh- and eighth-grade white students, but is it because of racism? What the elite teach is not only futile but counterproductive. For example, speaking standard English in an English-speaking country is critical for self-improvement. But that’s not the lesson from the nation’s multiculturalists, who call for the celebration of native languages and dialects. Sloppy-minded academics and assorted hustlers have taught that poor English, gangsta rap, men wearing pigtails and thug behavior should not be criticized but become a part of the celebration of diversity.

Black people could benefit from an honest examination of the bill of goods they’ve been sold. Such an examination would not come from black politicians, civil rights leaders or the black and white liberal elite. Those people have benefited politically and financially from keeping black Americans in a constant state of grievance based on alleged racial discrimination. The long-term solution for the problems that many black Americans face begins with an absolute rejection of the self-serving agenda of hustlers and poverty pimps.


I’m pretty sure the guy who wrote this is a racist. He’s probably a Klan member and a Tea Partier. What’s that? He’s black?

Then he must be an Uncle Tom.

Imagine for a moment if white people were murdering black men on a daily basis in our major cities, and white men were impregnating thousands of teenaged black girls then running off and leaving them with no assistance. Can you imagine the media sitting silently?

Now imagine a ghetto/slum/barrio/inner city filled with rednecks. They are poor, illiterate and lack meaningful job skills. They suffer from astronomically high rates of homicide, teen pregnancy, crime and unemployment.

Since racism is obviously not the problem, what is the solution?


WalterWilliams_072810_6


The Race Channel


Mediaite:

Harris-Perry: Bombers’ Muslim Faith As Relevant To Bombing As Ben Affleck Movies About Violence In Boston

Making the point that the Tsarnaev brothers’ Muslim faith at the moment bears little relevance to the investigation into the brothers’ decision to attack the Boston Marathon last week, MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry observed that Tsarnaev’s faith is about as relevant to the investigation right now as are Ben Affleck movies about violent events in Boston. Her panel guests agreed and added that Americans have to “otherize” violent actors in order to absolve themselves from responsibility for or connection to their violence.

“We don’t really know,” said Harris-Perry, throwing her hands up about the discussion into the Tsarnaev’s motives. “The younger brother, he’s getting all kinds of tweets from his friends. I think part of the answer is that it’s still an open question.”

“They don’t have the privilege of being anonymous – ‘they,’ speaking of people of color or other minorities – we don’t know yet, but we fill in the blanks,” said Georgetown University Professor Michael Eric Dyson. “We fill in the blanks with what makes us feel the most comfortable that this was an exceptional, extraordinary case that happened because they are this.”

“I keep wondering: is it possible that there would ever be a discussion like, ‘oh, this is because of Ben Affleck and the connection between Boston and movies about violence?’” Harris-Perry asked. “And, of course, the answer is ‘no.’”

“Given that they’re Chechen, given that they are literally Caucasian, our very sense of connection to them is this framed up notion of, like, Islam making them into something that is non-[unintelligible],” Harris-Perry continued.

“The point is that it’s important to say, ‘that is not us,” Dyson agreed. “We want to demonize the other. We have to distance it from the dominant culture.”


First of all, how can someone be “alienated” and at the same time have lots of friends? The younger Tsarnaev even went to a party on Wednesday night. While there is evidence the older Tsarnaev was alienated from his family, the same evidence indicates it was due to his religious extremism. So which came first, the Chechen or the egg?

The references to the Tsarnaev brothers’ race are very telling. This may come as a surprise to Melissa Harris-Perry and her ilk, but all white people are not part of the same club. The people classified as “white” (or “caucasian”) include numerous different countries, languages, religions, cultures and ideologies. Some of the people in those different categories consider each other mortal enemies.

Terrorism is a tactic that is not exclusive to any one group, but some groups are more closely associated with some types of terrorist acts than others. The Tsarnaev brothers belong to one group commonly associated with terrorist bombings. They are/were Muslims.

It ain’t rocket science.

BTW – The Tsarnaev brothers lived in one of the bluest parts of one of the bluest states in the country. If there was something about the dominant culture that made them go bad, wouldn’t that be the “blue” culture?



Deceptive Headlines, Anecdotal Evidence

Blog002


Raw Story:

West Virginia paper’s anti-LGBT column wants death for ‘n*ggers, spics, kikes and wops’

A newspaper in West Virginia is defending its decision to publish a reader’s racist and homophobic comments, which called for “queers” to be put to death along with “n*ggers, spics, kikes and wops.”

WCHS-TV reported on Wednesday that the Lincoln Journal had come under fire for printing a transcript of a reader’s voice mail comments in the “Gripe and Gratitudes” section of the paper.

The reader referenced a recent report about how the Lincoln County Board of Education had terminated lesbian teacher Kelli Burns from her job at Guyan Valley Middle School teacher after she accused board officials of forcing students to write complaints that she had tried to “turn them gay.”

“We were really glad to hear that School Board is getting rid of them queers,” the voice mail said. “The next thing is we need to get rid of all the n****rs, the spics, the kikes and the wops.”

“You know even them Catholics, they are wrong as baby eaters,” the reader continued. “We need to clear them people out and have good, white, God fearing Christians and everybody else needs to be put to death for their abominations.”

“We’ll keep Lincoln County white and right. Thank you.”

Some West Virginians told WCHS-TV that the column was offensive.

“That’s not nice,” Hamlin resident Melissa Rogers insisted. “I support the gays, and I’m not racist at all.”

But other readers agreed with the bigoted opinion.

“I don’t have to read it all, I already agree with that,” Hamlin resident Leroy Ramey opined. “Get rid of them.”

Lincoln Journal managing editor Sean O’Donoghue, who is a Roman Catholic, agreed that the comments were offensive, but said that he had no regrets about publishing them.


If you only read the headline you would get the impression that a West Virginia newspaper was in favor of putting gays and minorities to death. All they did was publish a reader’s racist and homophobic comments.

The comments are despicable, but I believe in free speech. I don’t see anything wrong with a newspaper publishing offensive comments and ideas, if for no other reason than to make people aware of what some of their neighbors are thinking. It would be appropriate for the paper to publish a disclaimer disavowing any support for the ideas, but that would be up to them.

What is missing in the article by Raw Story is context. What we are given is anecdotal evidence of two bigots expressing their opinions. Paired with a one-sided version of a teacher’s termination the article leaves the impression that West Virginia is filled with bigots.

I have never been to West Virginia so I can’t tell you what people there are like. But I strongly suspect they are real people and not caricatures. I don’t doubt that some of them are bigots. But I am equally sure that some of them are more intelligent and enlightened than that. Context would give us some idea of the prevailing local opinions.

But that might not fit the media’s preferred narrative about West Virginia.

I don’t know what really happened in this case. But I get the feeling there is more to the story than we are being told. That always makes me wonder why we aren’t being told everything.


Don’t Speak!

duct-tape-mouth


Philadelphia Magazine:

Being White in Philly

Whites, race, class, and the things that never get said.

My younger son goes to Temple, where he’s a sophomore. This year he’s living in an apartment with two friends at 19th and Diamond, just a few blocks from campus. It’s a dangerous neighborhood. Whenever I go see Nick, I get antsy and wonder what I was thinking, allowing him to rent there.

One day, before I pick him up for lunch, I stop to talk to a cop who’s parked a block away from Nick’s apartment.

“Is he already enrolled for classes?” the cop says when I point out where my son lives.

Well, given that it’s December, I think so. But his message is clear: Bad idea, this neighborhood. A lot of burglaries and robberies. Temple students are prime prey, the cop says.

Later, driving up Broad Street as I head home to Mount Airy, I stop at a light just north of Lycoming and look over at some rowhouses. One has a padlocked front door. A torn sheet covering the window in that door looks like it might be stained with sewage. I imagine not a crackhouse, but a child, maybe several children, living on the other side of that stained sheet. Plenty of children in Philadelphia live in places like that. Plenty live on Diamond, where my son rents, where there always seem to be a lot of men milling around doing absolutely nothing, where it’s clearly not a safe place to be.

I’ve shared my view of North Broad Street with people—white friends and colleagues—who see something else there: New buildings. Progress. Gentrification. They’re sunny about the area around Temple. I think they’re blind, that they’ve stopped looking. Indeed, I’ve begun to think that most white people stopped looking around at large segments of our city, at our poorest and most dangerous neighborhoods, a long time ago. One of the reasons, plainly put, is queasiness over race. Many of those neighborhoods are predominantly African-American. And if you’re white, you don’t merely avoid them—you do your best to erase them from your thoughts.

At the same time, white Philadelphians think a great deal about race. Begin to talk to people, and it’s clear it’s a dominant motif in and around our city. Everyone seems to have a story, often an uncomfortable story, about how white and black people relate.

Take a young woman I’ll call Susan, whom I met recently. She lost her BlackBerry in a biology lab at Villanova and Facebooked all the class members she could find, “wondering if you happened to pick it up or know who did.” No one had it. There was one black student in the class, whom I’ll call Carol, who responded: “Why would I just happen to pick up a BlackBerry and if this is a personal message I’m offended!”

Susan assured her that she had Facebooked the whole class. Carol wrote: “Next time be careful what type of messages you send around and what you say in them.”

[...]

Confusion, misread intentions, bruised feelings—everyone has not only a race story, but a thousand examples of trying to sort through our uneasiness on levels large and trivial. I do, too. My rowhouse in Mount Airy is on a mostly African-American block; it’s middle-class and friendly—in fact, it’s the friendliest street my family has ever lived on, with block parties and a spirit of watching out for each other. Whether a neighbor is black or white seems to be of no consequence whatsoever.

Yet there’s a dance I do when I go to the Wawa on Germantown Avenue. I find myself being overly polite. Each time I hold the door a little too long for a person of color, I laugh at myself, both for being so self-consciously courteous and for knowing that I’m measuring the thank-you’s. A friend who walks to his car parked on Front Street downtown early each morning has a similar running joke with himself. As he walks, my friend says hello and makes eye contact with whoever crosses his path. If the person is white, he’s bestowing a tiny bump of friendliness. If the person is black, it’s friendliness and a bit more: He’s doing something positive for race relations.

On one level, such self-consciousness and hypersensitivity can be seen as progress when it comes to race, a sign of how much attitudes have shifted for the better, a symbol of our desire for things to be better. And yet, lately I’ve come to fear that the opposite might also be true: that our carefulness is, in fact, at the heart of the problem.

Fifty years after the height of the civil rights movement, more than 25 years after electing its first African-American mayor, Philadelphia remains a largely segregated city, with uneasy boundaries in culture and understanding. And also in well-being. There is a black middle class, certainly, and blacks are well-represented in our power structure, but there remains a vast and seemingly permanent black underclass. Thirty-one percent of Philadelphia’s more than 600,000 black residents live below the poverty line. Blacks are more likely than whites to be victims of a crime or commit one, to drop out of school and to be unemployed.

What gets examined publicly about race is generally one-dimensional, looked at almost exclusively from the perspective of people of color. Of course, it is black people who have faced generations of discrimination and who deal with it still. But our public discourse ignores the fact that race—particularly in a place like Philadelphia—is also an issue for white people. Though white people never talk about it.

Everyone might have a race story, but few whites risk the third-rail danger of speaking publicly about race, given the long, troubled history of race relations in this country and even more so in this city. Race is only talked about in a sanitized form, when it’s talked about at all, with actual thoughts and feelings buried, which only ups the ante. Race remains the elephant in the room, even on the absurd level of who holds the door to enter a convenience store.


This may surprise Touré Neblett and Ta-Nehisi Coates, but white people don’t break out the “N-word” and talk about “uppity negroes” whenever black people aren’t around. In fact, white people feel uncomfortable discussing race at all, no matter who they are with.

The reason for that is simple – racism is the worst social taboo in the country. The only things worse than racism are crimes like rape and child molestation. But for non-crimes, racism is the very worst. You can be a sexist, tell crude jokes, suffer from chronic halitosis and B.O. or even fart in church and you’ll get less disapprobation and condemnation.

That’s why the race card makes such an effective cudgel – people are terrified of being thought as racists. So what happens when white people do start talking about race?

Controversial Article Published In Local Magazine Has Mayor Nutter Asking For Investigation

A controversial article published in Philadelphia Magazine this month has the attention of the Nutter Administration.

The article, titled “Being White in Philly,” features a series of interviews with anonymous white residents from different areas of the city who share stories about their interaction with black residents.

Mayor Nutter calls the article’s tone “disgusting,” and he’s asked the Human Relations Commission to investigate some of the sensitive racial issues explored in the piece.


I’m sure that’s gonna facilitate a lot of discussion and sharing.



The Politics Of Grievance

racist flow chart


Before there was Touré Neblett, there was Race-Pimp Ta-Nehisi Coates:

The Good, Racist People

Last month the actor Forest Whitaker was stopped in a Manhattan delicatessen by an employee. [...] The employee stopped Whitaker, accused him of shoplifting and then promptly frisked him. The act of self-deputization was futile. Whitaker had stolen nothing. On the contrary, he’d been robbed.

[...]

The idea that racism lives in the heart of particularly evil individuals, as opposed to the heart of a democratic society, is reinforcing to anyone who might, from time to time, find their tongue sprinting ahead of their discretion. We can forgive Whitaker’s assailant. Much harder to forgive is all that makes Whitaker stand out in the first place. New York is a city, like most in America, that bears the scars of redlining, blockbusting and urban renewal. The ghost of those policies haunts us in a wealth gap between blacks and whites that has actually gotten worse over the past 20 years.

But much worse, it haunts black people with a kind of invisible violence that is given tell only when the victim happens to be an Oscar winner. The promise of America is that those who play by the rules, who observe the norms of the “middle class,” will be treated as such. But this injunction is only half-enforced when it comes to black people, in large part because we were never meant to be part of the American story. Forest Whitaker fits that bill, and he was addressed as such.

I am trying to imagine a white president forced to show his papers at a national news conference, and coming up blank. I am trying to a imagine a prominent white Harvard professor arrested for breaking into his own home, and coming up with nothing. I am trying to see Sean Penn or Nicolas Cage being frisked at an upscale deli, and I find myself laughing in the dark. It is worth considering the messaging here. It says to black kids: “Don’t leave home. They don’t want you around.” It is messaging propagated by moral people.

The other day I walked past this particular deli. I believe its owners to be good people. I felt ashamed at withholding business for something far beyond the merchant’s reach. I mentioned this to my wife. My wife is not like me. When she was 6, a little white boy called her cousin a nigger, and it has been war ever since. “What if they did that to your son?” she asked.

And right then I knew that I was tired of good people, that I had had all the good people I could take.


I don’t know what happened that day in Manhattan, but the only evidence we are given that the deli employee was motivated by racism is the fact that Whitaker is black. If that was indeed his motivation that would be wrong but that is a big assumption to make. I would really like to hear the employee’s side of the story because I used to make my living catching shoplifters and Winona Ryder is proof that wealth and fame are not proof of innocence.

But let us assume for the sake of argument that the deli employee stopped Whitaker solely because of the color of his skin. What does that prove? It proves that the deli employee is an ignorant bigot. It proves nothing about the other deli employees, the deli’s owners, the other residents of New York City or the rest of the United States.

Mr. Coates cannot conceive of wealthy/famous/powerful white people being treated rudely or wrongly suspected of a crime. First of all, wealth, fame and power mean little if your identity is not recognized. You are just another person. Celebrities often try to conceal their identities in public. In this case I think it’s fairly safe to say that the deli employee did not realize who he was dealing with.

I can personally attest to the fact that white people are sometimes treated rudely and/or wrongly suspected of crimes, sometimes by other white people, and sometimes by people of color. But when it happens to a white person it is no big deal because shit happens and that is just part of life.

I found it really interesting that Mrs. Coates is carrying such a grievance from a couple decades ago. A little white boy called her cousin a vile racial epithet. But did the boy even understand what the word meant? Do we know where he learned it? Perhaps he learned the word from watching a Quentin Tarantino movie or from a different little black boy.

When I was in junior high a couple black guys beat me up after school one day. I wasn’t seriously injured but their words made clear they jumped me because I was white. Should I have carried that grievance with me in the four decades since then and let it color all my interactions with black people?

That was not the first nor the last time that I had unpleasant experiences with black people. But then again I have had many more unpleasant experiences with white people over the years than I had with people of color. Not fights necessarily, but arguments or brief encounters. I’ve had guns pointed at me four times in my life, once by a cop and all four times by white people. That doesn’t count the time I was robbed (home invasion) by three white people. The scar running through my right eyebrow was put there by a drunk white guy in a bar who sucker-punched me and took off running.

I am not into the politics of grievance. I always see people as individuals. What those three white individuals did to me was no reflection on the rest of the white people on the planet. What those two black kids did all those years ago was on them, not the rest of their race. I don’t even carry a grudge against them. I still see one of them from time to time (he used to live around the corner from me until his mother died) and when we run into each other we usually stop for a moment to laugh and talk.

Forest Whitaker had an unpleasant experience at a Manhattan deli last month. Boo-fucking-hoo. He needs to pull-up his big-boy panties and move on. So does Ta-Nehisi Coates.


The Ugly Truth


Totes Not Safe For Work!

I posted this in the comments last night but it’s a slow news day so I promoted it to the front page:

On his Friday podcast, comedian and top-rated Carolla Digital podcaster Adam Carolla delivered a stern rebuke to all the “hypocritical pussies” out there, in reaction to a March 5 story from Huffington Post-San Francisco’s Robin Wilkey that portrayed his exchange earlier this month with Democratic California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom as racist.

“The Huffington Post has come out with a story that says ‘Adam Carolla to Gavin Newsom: ‘What’s wrong with blacks and Latinos?’’” Carolla said. “That’s not what I said to Gavin Newsom. I didn’t bring up blacks and Latinos. He brought up blacks and Latinos. But let me take this moment to now talk to all the pussies that are out there trying to stir things up and turn me into a racist. I got news for you: Me saying parents should stick around and raise the children – me saying families and cultures should focus on education — is not radical or revolutionary. It’s the fucking truth.”

Carolla, author of “Not Taco Bell Material,” said that while Newsom is quick to blame “the system,” Newsom happens to be a part of what’s wrong that system.

“You are the system, Gavin Newsom,” Carolla said. “Fix the system, but you won’t fix the system, because you know what it takes to fix the system and you’re a fucking coward. And guys like Huffington Post — you guys fucking line up behind these people and let me tell you something, you guys all have blood on your hands, because the problem could be fixed. It’s a problem, and it’s a problem that involves bodies. People die every year.”

“There’s people getting shot,” Carolla added. “There’s brown people shooting other brown people on the streets of Chicago every fucking day of the week. And you guys sit there silently. If it was a Sandy Hook situation or anything else, you’d be all up in arms. But you can’t say a word, so you sit there with your fucking coward hands over your fucking little cowardly soup coolers. And then when somebody has the guts to say something — to speak the truth for fucking one hot second, you jump up his ass and call him a racist. Thus, you silence the media. Now you perpetuate the problem.”


Yes, I realize that Adam Corolla is a sexist pig who uses really foul language. But he is right.

There is a sickness in the soul of black culture. It is NOT genetic. It is not a problem common to all black Americans. It is a chronic and deadly disease that is epidemic in the black American subculture.

Yes, I know about the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow segregation. Those are horrible blights upon our national history. But we have black children being born today whose grandparents were born after the end of the Civil Rights struggle. Nor is this disease confined to black culture in the formerly slave-owning and segregated South. This “social” disease infects black culture in the deep South, in the industrial North and way out West in California.

It is a cultural cancer that denigrates traditional values like education, hard work and monogamy while glorifying drugs, violence and irresponsible sexual behavior.

wmcb:

A lot of what has happened to the black community is indeed the fault of white people, but not in the way the pols think.

In the normal course of life, every group gets feedback from society around them. This is a good thing. If the Mormons are marrying multiple 12-year-olds, eventually the greater society says, HEY, STOP THAT FREAKY SHIT. And so they did. Societal feedback works.

What white liberal society did, in their guilt over our admitted past sins, was to cut the black community off completely from the normal, necessary feedback loop that any subgroup in a greater society needs. It was short-circuited entirely. No one wants to say STOP THAT SHIT. Instead, we are told that gang symbols, thuggery, violent attitudes toward women, and fathering children willy nilly is their “culture”, and “keepin’ it real” so we must tread carefully. Bullshit.

What we are seeing is the result, after a few generations, of a societal sub-group being deliberately and systemically isolated from the the natural feedback of approval/disapproval, this works/that doesn’t work, that all the rest of us learn and prosper and succeed by.

That’s not “sensitivity”, that’s fucking cruel, infantilizing, and destructive.


The worst part is that many leaders of the black community have grown fat by helping to keep their own people in virtual chains.

One thing is certain – what we have been doing for the past 50 years ain’t working. America is supposed to be a land of opportunity. Other groups from all over the world endure hardship to come here and once they arrive they start following the same path as generations of immigrants before them. But the black community remains mired in chronic poverty, illiteracy, crime and single-parenthood.

And anyone who tries to talk bluntly and honestly about what is wrong and what needs to be done about it gets labeled a racist and is marginalized. Even if they are black.

Exit question: What has Touré Neblett ever done to improve the lives of any black person not named Neblett?


Get A Grip!


So FLOTUS shows up on the Jimmy Fallon show last week to do “The Evolution of Mom Dancing”. Not my cup of tea but different strokes for different folks. While we do expect a certain amount of decorum in affairs surrounding our nation’s leaders, Michelle Obama is a private citizen and she was on her own time.

On the other hand she is not immune to mockery. If the original video was within the bounds of appropriateness then the response by Michelle Malkin easily was within those bounds as well. But some of the reactions to the latter video have been over the top.

I really don’t understand why Michelle Malkin inspires so much venom and hatred from the left. Like many other prominent conservative women she makes it her policy to republish or retweet the hate mail she receives from Vile Progs. And she receives a lot of it – ugly, nasty stuff filled with racism and misogyny.

Some people need to get a grip. But for some reason you rarely see anyone on the left condemning the racism and misogyny emanating from their side of town.



You Can’t Argue With A Bigot

racist flow chart


Touré Neblett’s ideological twin brother Ta-Nehisi Coates:

The American Case Against a Black Middle Class

I went on a Twitter rant yesterday because I’d finished Isabel Wilkerson’s phenomenal The Warmth Of Other Suns. The book is a narrative history of the Great Migration through the eyes of actual migrants. Several points stick out for me.

1) The Great Migration was not an influx of illiterate, bedraggled, lazy have-nots. Wilkerson marshalls a wealth of social science data showing that the migrants were generally better educated than their Northern brethren, more likely to stay married, and more likely to stay employed. In fact, in some cases, black migrants were better educated than their Northern white neighbors.

2) In this sense, the migrants to Northern cities resembled immigrant classes to whom black people in these same cities are often unfavorably compared to. There’s a quote in Wilkerson’s book which I can’t find where a supervisor basically says that blacks are the favored workers because they will work hard at the worst jobs for relatively little money. You would have thought the guy was talking about Hispanic farm-hands today.

3) The black migrants were not immigrants. They were citizens of this country who did not enjoy its full protection. Unlike other immigrant classes, blacks were never able to cash in on their hard work and middle-class values. For all of their work-ethic, education-valuing, and long-term marriages, they received the worst wages in the worst jobs, were limited to the worst housing, and stuffed in the worst schools.

[...]

6) America does not really want a black middle class. Some of the most bracing portions of Wilkerson’s book involve the vicious attacks on black ambition. When a black family in Chicago saves up enough to move out of the crowded slums into Cicero, the neighborhood riots. The father had saved for years for a piano for his kids. The people of Cicero tossed the piano out the window, looted his home, torched his apartment and then torched his building. In the South, when black people attempted to leave to earn better wages, they were often forcibly detained, and thus kept in slavery as late as the 1950s.

On a policy level, there is a persistent strain wherein efforts to aid The People are engineered in such a way wherein they help black people a lot less. It is utterly painful to read about the New Deal being left in the hands of Southern governments which were hostile to black people, and then to today see a significant chunk of health care, again, left in the hands of Southern governments which are hostile to black people. At this point, such efforts no longer require open bigotry. They are simply built into the system.


Where do I start?

First things first – from Wikipedia:

The Warmth of Other Suns: The Epic Story of America’s Great Migration (2010) is a historical study by African-American author Isabel Wilkerson.[1][2] It is about the The Great Migration and the Second Great Migration, the movement of blacks out of the Southern United States to the Midwest, Northeast and West between 1915 and 1970.[1][2] The book intertwines a general history and statistical analysis of the entire period, and the biographies of three persons: a sharecropper’s wife who left Mississippi in the 1930s for Chicago, named Ida Mae Brandon Gladney; an agricultural worker, George Swanson Starling, who left Florida for New York City in the 1940s; and Robert Joseph Pershing Foster, a doctor who left Louisiana in the early 1950s, for Los Angeles.


As you can see, we are really talking about two great migrations, both of which were triggered by wars, the mechanization of southern agriculture and northern/western industrialization.

Now a little point-by-point rebuttal:

1. Which “Northern brethren” is Mr. Coates referring to? The White Anglo-Saxon Protestants? The Irish Catholics? The Italians? The White Russians? The Jewish? The Poles? The Hungarians? The Germans? During the same period that 6 million blacks moved north and west there were also tens of millions of immigrants flooding into those same areas from all over the world.

2. If blacks were the favored workers then what happened? Did those greedy, rich, white factory owners prefer paying higher wages to inferior employees because of racism?

3. Yes, black people got a raw deal in this country for most of our history. I don’t want to seem flippant about slavery and Jim Crow segregation but lots of groups have been mistreated throughout history. At some point there needs to be a statute of limitation on historic grievances.

6. Isn’t Cicero a suburb of blue/Democratic/unionized Chicago? Last I checked Chicago was in Illinois, and even southern Illinois is north of the Mason-Dixon line. So exactly who is to blame here?

I’m not quite sure how the idea that black people weren’t allowed to leave the south fits with the “great migration” concept.

As for those New Deal Southern governments, they were all Democrats. In regard to the current implementation of health care, is there some documentation that the quality of healthcare in the South is racially discriminatory? Seriously – that’s a really troubling assertion, especially if it’s true. Where is the evidence?

The fact is that Touré/Ta-Nehisi is a bigot. He doesn’t care about facts or evidence. All he cares about his irrational hatred of white people. He will grab a hold of anything that supports his bigoted views and ignore anything that doesn’t.


Honesty Isn’t Always The Best Policy

Rob Parker

Rob Parker


ESPN fires Rob Parker

Rob Parker, the commentator who created controversy when he questioned whether Redskins quarterback Robert Griffin III is a “cornball brother” because he has a white fiancee, has been fired by ESPN.


Rob Parker was fired for being too honest. He pulled back the curtain and exposed some of the racist views that are widely held in the black community. We certainly can’t have any of that!

I talked to some people down in Washington, D.C. … but my question, which is just a straight, honest question, is he a brother or is he a cornball brother? …

Well, he’s not really. Okay, he’s black, he does his thing, but he’s not really down with the cause. He’s not one of us. He’s kind of black, but he’s not really like the guy you really want to hang out with because he’s off to something else … That’s just all I want to find out about him. I don’t know because I keep hearing these things. We all know he has a white fiancee and there’s talk about that he’s a Republican, which there’s no information at all. I’m just trying to dig deeper into why he has an issue.


This is post-racial America, where only white people can be racists.


I called it!

tim-scott-ap-124872


When Tim Scott was named to replace Jim DeMint in the Senate, I said:

3. If forced to acknowledge his race, the media will refer to him as a “token black”.


Today’s New York Times:

But this “first black” rhetoric tends to interpret African-American political successes — including that of President Obama — as part of a morality play that dramatizes “how far we have come.” It obscures the fact that modern black Republicans have been more tokens than signs of progress.

[...]

The trope of the black conservative has retained a man-bites-dog newsworthiness that is long past its shelf life. Clichés about fallen barriers are increasingly meaningless; symbols don’t make for coherent policies. Republicans will not gain significant black support unless they take policy positions that advance black interests. No number of Tim Scotts — or other cynical tokens — will change that.


At least they didn’t call him an “Uncle Tim”.


White leaders worried that black candidate might win


Oh, wait . . .

Blacks fret free-for-all for Jesse Jackson Jr. seat

Black leaders are growing increasingly worried that a white candidate might seize the seat of former Democratic Rep. Jesse Jackson in the upcoming Illinois special election.

With a host of black candidates announcing their intention to run, the concern is that they could split the African-American vote and provide a plurality to a white contender. The worries escalated this week after former Rep. Debbie Halvorson, a white Democrat and veteran of suburban Chicago politics, threw her hat into the ring.

[...]

Halvorson, black leaders say, presents a particular threat. The former congresswoman, who served two years in the House and spent 15 years in local and state office, fell short in her primary bid early this year against Jackson, but she won majorities of the vote in Will and Kankakee counties — suburban, mostly white areas that make up two of the district’s three counties.

Some black officials have met Halvorson’s entry into the race with outright hostility. Kwame Raoul, a Democratic state senator who has been vocal about his concern that a white candidate could win the seat, said Halvorson is exploiting an opportunity she saw in the emerging crowded field of black candidates.


Welcome to post-racial America, where the only thing that really matters is the color of your skin.


Pretzel Logic


Volokh Conspiracy:

En Banc Sixth Circuit Voids Michigan Civil Rights Initiative

By an 8-7 vote, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has held that Michigan’s Proposal 2, aka the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, is unconstituional. The Court split along predictable ideological lines, with Democratic nominees siding with the plaintiffs, and Republican nominees voting to uphold the initiative.

Judge Cole delivered the opinion for the court, joined by judges Martin, Daughtrey, Moore, Clay, White, Stranch, and Donald. His opinion begins:

A student seeking to have her family’s alumni connections considered in her application to one of Michigan’s esteemed public universities could do one of four things to have the school adopt a legacy-conscious admissions policy: she could lobby the admissions committee, she could petition the leadership of the university, she could seek to influence the school’s governing board, or, as a measure of last resort, she could initiate a statewide campaign to alter the state’s constitution. The same cannot be said for a black student seeking the adoption of a constitutionally permissible race-conscious admissions policy. That student could do only one thing to effect change: she could attempt to amend the Michigan Constitution—a lengthy, expensive, and arduous process—to repeal the consequences of Proposal 2. The existence of such a comparative structural burden undermines the Equal Protection Clause’s guarantee that all citizens ought to have equal access to the tools of political change.

In other words, it is unconstitutional for a state constitution to prohibit the consideration of race by state actors.

So prohibiting discrimination on account of race is (wait for it) racist.

Go figure.


What a load of horseshit!


From Megan Garber at The Atlantic

Where America’s Racist Tweets Come From

Floating Sheep, a group of geography academics, took advantage of that fact to turn hatred — and, just as often, stupidity — into information. The team searched Twitter for racism-revealing terms that appeared in the context of tweets that mentioned “Obama,” “re-elected,” or “won.” That search resulted in (a shockingly high and surprisingly low) 395 tweets. The team then sorted the tweets according to the state they were sent from, comparing the racist tweets to the total number of geocoded tweets coming from that state during the same time period (November 1 – 7). To normalize states across population levels, the team then used a location quotient-inspired measure — an economic derivation used to analyze norms across geographical locations — to compare a state’s racist tweets to the national average of racist tweets.


From the Floating Sheep website:

Using the examples of tweets chronicled by Jezebel blog post we collected tweets that contained the text “monkey” or “nigger” AND also contain the text “Obama” OR “reelected” OR “won”. A quick, and very unsettling, examination of the search results revealed that this indeed was a good match for our target of election-related hate speech. We end up with a total of 395 of some of the nastiest tweets you might possibly imagine. And given that we’re talking about the Internet, that is really saying something.


There are so many flaws in this “study” I don’t know where to start. We don’t know anything about these Twitter users other than location, not their age, gender or even race. African Americans are notorious for using the “N-word”, albeit in a different contest than it is used by white racists. These could be troll accounts for all we know.

In one week’s time they found 395 tweets, but they don’t say how many different Twitter users were involved. I am guessing that number was less than 395, as it is unlikely that each individual posted only a single racist tweet.

There are a lot of racist terms out there, and some of them have dual meanings. There are racial epithets that are directed at white people too, and not all racism is evidenced by racial terminology. The methodology is also skewed by the fact that Twitter users do not represent the public at large but are instead heavily skewed toward a younger demographic.

But let’s push that aside and just look at the numbers. There are over 311 million people in this country according to the most recent census. There are over 37 million people in California alone, but according to that chart there were only 11 racist tweeters in the whole damn state, and most of them came from the blue areas of Los Angeles and the SF Bay area. Utah shows a single dot and yet it is listed as having the 5th highest Racism LQ.

Even if we were to assume (based on this faulty study) that the South is “more racist” than the rest of the country, it still doesn’t tell us how racist the country actually is.

This is a steaming pile of horseshit. But I’m sure somebody will use it as a reference to argue that “studies show” the South is still filled with racists.


I won’t miss this shit


Andrew Sullivan To ABC: If Romney Wins Florida And VA, It’s The ‘Confederacy’

During this Sunday’s edition of ABC’s This Week, Daily Beast writer Andrew Sullivan claimed that if Republican nominee Mitt Romney wins back Florida and Virginia in the upcoming 2012 presidential election, especially due to the white vote, then the South’s electoral map will look exactly like the pro-slavery United States Confederacy during the Civil War.

This observation came in response to host George Stephanopoulos noting that the latest polls show that six out of ten white Americans intend to vote for Romney.

PBS reporter Gwen Ifill said that “we can’t ignore” the possible factor racial animus may play in deciding the election, noting that the poll indicates that, on some level, people are still willing to admit “racial bias.”

Sullivan then added: “If Virginia and Florida go back to the Republicans, it’s the Confederacy. Entirely. You put a map of the Civil War over this electoral map, you’ve got the Civil War.”

Conservative panelist George Will rolled his eyes. “I don’t know,” said a skeptical Ifill.

Will then posited two possible explanations for Obama’s slippage in the white vote since 2008: “A lot of white people who voted for Obama in 2008 watched him govern for four years and said, ‘Not so good. Let’s try someone else.’ The alternative, the ‘Confederacy’ hypothesis is that those people somehow, for some reason in the last four years became racist.”


I’m sure a lot of people who voted for Obama were enamored with the idea that we were finally entering a “post-racial” era in American history. That idea is certainly appealing. The unfortunate reality is that because of Obama this nation is now more “racialized” than it has been at any time since the Sixties.

Are there still racists out there? Definitely – and a lot of them are white. But open racism (by whites) is fairly rare. It is considered uncouth and socially unacceptable on both the left and right.

But guess what? The white racists didn’t vote for Obama last time either but he still won anyway. And most of the people who didn’t vote for him four years ago weren’t racists – they wouldn’t have voted for a white Democrat either.

I am one of many people who have no problem with the color of Obama’s skin. It’s the content of his character I don’t like.



My Spam Folder

(click to enlarge)


The graphic above is an actual screenshot of my email spam folder, after I deleted the ads for Viagra, penis enlargement and Russian mail order brides.

I do want to discuss the first one:

Myiq2xu, Republican attempts to reduce voter turnout in minority neighborhoods are so widespread that, at the request of American civil rights groups, international monitors will oversee our elections:

United Nations-affiliated election monitors from Europe and central Asia will be at polling places around the U.S. looking for voter suppression activities by conservative groups, a concern raised by civil rights groups during a meeting this week.[...]

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), a United Nations partner on democratization and human rights projects, will deploy 44 observers from its human rights office around the country on Election Day to monitor an array of activities, including potential disputes at polling places. It’s part of a broader observation mission that will send out an additional 80 to 90 members of parliament from nearly 30 countries.

Liberal-leaning civil rights groups met with representatives from the OSCE this week to raise their fears about what they say are systematic efforts to suppress minority voters likely to vote for President Obama.

The election is going to come down to a battle between Democratic voter turnout efforts and Republican voter suppression efforts. Please help get Democratic voters to the polls by contributing $3 to President Barack Obama.

Keep fighting,
Chris Bowers
Campaign Director, Daily Kos


Have I mentioned lately how much I despise Vile Progs?

Barack Obama is still President of the United States. He controls the Department of Justice and the rest of federal law enforcement. If he genuinely concerned about illegal voter suppression, why isn’t the DOJ on top of it? Where is the Obamaloving media?

What are these observers supposed to be looking for, armed KKK members standing outside polling places?

November 6th cannot get here soon enough.


Live by the race card, die by the race card


When karma teams up with the Law of Unintended Consequences:

Romney is winning the white vote — by a lot

Political analysts (including The Fix) spend a good bit of time these days talking about important voter groups — Latino voters and female voters, in particular.

But all of the focus on these groups has obfuscated one fact: Mitt Romney is performing very, very well among white voters. And in fact, most recent polls show him winning the white vote by more than any GOP presidential candidate since Ronald Reagan.

Some recent national polls have shown Romney losing the Latino vote by upwards of 40 or 50 points – a result that, if it came to pass, would significantly hurt the GOP’s chances of winning the White House, given the rapid growth in the Latino population.

But even if Romney sustains a huge loss on the Latino vote, he could very well offset that (and much more) by out-performing his Republican predecessors when it comes to white voters, which are still about seven times as much of the electorate as Latinos. Indeed, it’s not unreasonable to think that Romney could win 60 percent or more of white voters this year.

The most recent national polls from four pollsters — Gallup, Monmouth University, Fox News and the Pew Research Center — all show Romney winning the white vote by more than 20 points. That’s something no GOP presidential candidate has done since Reagan’s landslide 1984 reelection win.


I can already hear Touré Neblett and the other Vile Prog race pimps crying on November 7th – “It was racism!

When Obama and the Democratic leadership made playing the race card a central part of their strategy I predicted it would backfire on them. It was identity politics at its worst.

Identity politics are political arguments that focus upon the self-interest and perspectives of self-identified social interest groups and ways in which people’s politics may be shaped by aspects of their identity through race, class, religion, gender, sexual orientation or traditional dominance. Not all members of any given group are necessarily involved in identity politics. The practice has probably a long existence; but the explicit term and movements linked to it really came into being during the latter part of the 20th century. It can most notably be found in class movements, feminist movements, gay and lesbian movements, disability movements, ethnic movements and post colonial movements.


It is literally a strategy of divide and conquer. What you do is divide everybody up into different identity boxes and then try to patch together enough boxes to win elections. This isn’t necessarily bad.

There are a few problems with this strategy. First of all, all of us occupy more than one identity box. Secondly, different identity groups will not agree on every issue. But the real problem is that the flip side of identity politics is alienation.

I am a straight, single, white male. Political campaigns aimed at women, minorities and LGBT’s aren’t aimed at me. If they focus too much on those other groups there is the strong chance that I will start to feel left out. It’s like watching ads for feminine hygiene products – no matter how much fun you can have with the new kind of tampons I still ain’t buying them.

But then again I don’t dislike tampons either. They just don’t apply to my life.

But playing the race card plays identity groups against each other. For almost five years now Obama and the Democrats have been relying heavily on the race card, and to a lesser extent the misogyny and homophobe cards too. Anyone who disagrees with them on any issue gets hit with one of more of these cards.

But if the Democrats keep hitting white people with the race card (and who else gets hit?) how can you blame white people if they start to feel unwanted by the Democratic party? I know that getting called a racist sure didn’t make me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

The race card divides people by race. By focusing so heavily on race it makes other identities (such as gender, religion and sexual orientation) less important.

Here’s the problem – white people are still the majority in this country. They are the single largest demographic group in every state. Any political strategy that is going to alienate the majority demographic is doomed to fail.

The key is to bring people together, not break them apart.


It ain’t racism if it’s true


Andrea Mitchell’s reaction is priceless:

JOHN SUNUNU: What people saw last night was a president that revealed his incompetence, how lazy and detached he is, and how he has absolutely no idea how serious the economic problems of the country are, and how he has failed to even begin to address them. And I think even the liberal press reacted with shock at this revelation, and I find it fascinating, now this morning, after they’ve slept, to watch them all scrambling around to clean up the mess the president left on the floor last night. On the other hand, Mitt Romney came in with a lot of specifics, a lot of very sharp knowledge of issues, not only with the Obama-version of bumper-sticker numbers, but the governor showed that he understand policies and he understand how to make policy into law talking about what he did in Massachusetts.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Governor, I want to give you a chance to maybe take it back. Did you really mean to call Barack Obama, the president of the United States, lazy?

JOHN SUNUNU: Yes. I think you saw him admit it… he said, you know, ‘they’re making me do this work.’ He didn’t want to prepare for this debate. He’s lazy and disengaged.


When all else fails, play the race card.

Imani Gandy (Angry Black Lady):

ni-CLANG!

Former Governor of New Hampshire and Bush appointee John Sununu appeared on MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports and called President Obama lazy.

Yes he did.

And guess what? It’s a dog whistle

[...]

I’m already seeing pundits and bloggers using weasel words to describe what is an outright no-bones-about-it racial dogwhistle. Just call it what it is. The “black people are lazy” is a stereotype that dates back to minstrel shows and blackface. It’s fucking racist.

I really need the media to stop mincing words, here. Sununu knew what he was doing. The Romney campaign sent him out to do it (Sununu is one of Romney’s top campaign advisors.) When asked if he meant it, he doubled down. The media needs to call the Romney campaign out.

The Romney campaign is employing racial dogwhistles in this campaign. From “food stamps,” to “handouts,” to Romney’s lies about Obama’s welfare policy, to the ongoing questions about President Obama’s birth certificate, to wingnut demands that President Obama relase his transcripts because they refuse to believe that President Obama attended Harvard and Columbia on his own merit, this campaign is drowning in racism.

Call it what it is, please.

And John? Just say it, dickhead. You know you want to.


I have news for Ms. Gandy – some black people ARE lazy. So are some white people (including me). If you say “Black people are lazy” that is a racist stereotype. If you say “Barack Obama must be lazy because he’s black” that would be a racist stereotype too.

But if you watch Barack Obama for a few years and come to the conclusion that he doesn’t like to work very hard it is NOT racist nor a stereotype to say that he is lazy. Another stereotype about black people is that they are good singers and dancers. Is it a racist stereotype to recognize that Michael Jackson was a great singer and dancer? Of course not.

BARACK OBAMA IS LAZY. He is also arrogant and conceited. He’s a sexist dick too.

But wait! There’s more:


John Sununu is a honey badger. Honey badger don’t give a shit.


Only 17 States Have No Voter ID Law

(Click to enlarge)

States in green have strict photo ID laws on the books while those in yellow have less strict photo ID requirements. States in blue have non-photo voter ID laws while those in gray have no voter ID law on the books.


FYI, via the National Conference of State Legislatures.

This is an open thread.


Mercury Fulminate


The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action

Affirmative action in university admissions started in the late 1960s as a noble effort to jump-start racial integration and foster equal opportunity. But somewhere along the decades, it has lost its way.

Over time, it has become a political lightning rod and one of our most divisive social policies. It has evolved into a regime of racial preferences at almost all selective schools — preferences so strikingly large and politically unpopular that administrators work hard to conceal them. The largest, most aggressive preferences are usually reserved for upper-middle-class minorities on whom they often inflict significant academic harm, whereas more modest policies that could help working-class and poor people of all races are given short shrift. Academic leaders often find themselves flouting the law and acting in ways that aggravate the worst consequences of large preferences. They have become prisoners of a system that many privately deplore for its often-perverse unintended effects but feel they cannot escape.

The single biggest problem in this system — a problem documented by a vast and growing array of research — is the tendency of large preferences to boomerang and harm their intended beneficiaries. Large preferences often place students in environments where they can neither learn nor compete effectively — even though these same students would thrive had they gone to less competitive but still quite good schools.

We refer to this problem as “mismatch,” a word that largely explains why, even though blacks are more likely to enter college than are whites with similar backgrounds, they will usually get much lower grades, rank toward the bottom of the class, and far more often drop out. Because of mismatch, racial preference policies often stigmatize minorities, reinforce pernicious stereotypes, and undermine the self-confidence of beneficiaries, rather than creating the diverse racial utopias so often advertised in college campus brochures.

The mismatch effect happens when a school extends to a student such a large admissions preference — sometimes because of a student’s athletic prowess or legacy connection to the school, but usually because of the student’s race — that the student finds himself in a class where he has weaker academic preparation than nearly all of his classmates. The student who would flourish at, say, Wake Forest or the University of Richmond, instead finds himself at Duke, where the professors are not teaching at a pace designed for him — they are teaching to the “middle” of the class, introducing terms and concepts at a speed that is unnerving even to the best-prepared student.

[...]

Of course, being surrounded by very able peers can confer benefits, too — the atmosphere may be more intellectually challenging, and one may learn a lot from observing others. We have no reason to think that small preferences are not, on net, beneficial. But contemporary racial preferences used by selective schools — especially those extended to blacks and Native Americans — tend to be extremely large, often amounting to the equivalent of hundreds of SAT points.

At the University of Texas, whose racial preference programs come before the Supreme Court for oral argument on October 10, the typical black student receiving a race preference placed at the 52nd percentile of the SAT; the typical white was at the 89th percentile. In other words, Texas is putting blacks who score at the middle of the college-aspiring population in the midst of highly competitive students. This is the sort of academic gap where mismatch flourishes. And, of course, mismatch does not occur merely with racial preferences; it shows up with large preferences of all types.


The most amazing thing about this article is that it appeared in The Atlantic – which is not exactly the Klan Gazette. Because it was published in a solidly lefty magazine the race pimps are ignoring it, at least so far. So are the wingnuts for that matter – nobody wants to touch it.

Except some Krazy Klown.

Fans of Breaking Bad can tell you that mercury fulminate is a highly explosive substance. Get careless with it and you can easily blow yourself into itty bitty pieces. Discussions about race are kinda the same thing.

It’s been nearly half a century since segregation was outlawed in this country. Since that time blacks have continued to be underrepresented in colleges and universities – fewer enter and fewer graduate in comparison to their white counterparts at every age group. On the other hand, Asians and Jews tend to be overrepresented.

What is the cause of this? I don’t know.

But political correctness has stifled all discussion of the subject to the point where just gathering and reporting empirical data can draw allegations of racism.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 273 other followers