Nomentum

The Once got what amounts to a political spanking (x2) last night when he lost 40+% of the Democratic primary vote in Kentucky and Arkansas. Fresh on the heels of West Virginia’s stinging rebuke of just two weeks ago, we’re sure to see the chattering classes use their buzzwords today. You’ll see “poor whites,” “rural whites,” “The South,” and of course, “racist.” You’ll see Dems, who just three years ago were all abuzz about a “50 state strategy” actively write off these states as states they were never going to win anyway.

Here at Crawdad Hole Headquarters, though, we like to focus on the truth, and the truth is that Obama has been facing primary problems throughout the country. Just look at the results of primary schedule so far. Some salient features for your talking points:

  • 18% of New Hampshire Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 12% of Missouri Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 11% of Michigan Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 43% of Oklahoma Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 11% of Massachusetts Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 11% of Tennessee Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 19% of Alabama Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 23% of Louisiana Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 12% of Maryland Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 17% of Rhode Island Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 21% of North Carolina Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 41% of West Virginia Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 5% of Oregon Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 41% of Arkansas Democrats declined to vote for Obama.
  • 42% of Kentucky Democrats declined to vote for Obama.

(Open primaries are indicated by bolding.)

That’s 15 out 35 primaries so far. What’s more, according to the Primary Schedule Wiki for this election year, “Uncommitted” currently has 72 delegates. Listed in all 50 states, “Uncommitted” has thus far garnered over 400,000 votes, probably more as some states clearly aren’t counting protests votes.

My, how far the mighty have fallen off those high horses. Take a moment to savor this. It might not last. I hope it does, but you never know in this environment. The press is doing it’s very best to disrupt the avalanche of unhappy news that continues to befall The Once, but the truth is slipping out here and there, and even his friends are feeling emboldened to challenge Obama openly.

Meanwhile, Biden has his surrogates out in force trying to nix any idea that Obama might swap him for Hillary Clinton in order to win. He’s ‘s even recently come out saying that he would like to team up with Hillary in 2016. As if. If he thinks we’re putting him in line BEFORE Madam Secretary, he’s got another think coming.

But I digress. The point is that it’s looking like Nobama has all the momentum. That doesn’t mean Mitt wins, but clearly Americans are fed up with the current occupant of the White House and they are making it known. It’s way early, so keep your powder dry, but this thing is taking on juggernaut proportions. We’ll see if Obama gets flattened, or if the press can reinvent him as Sisyphus and help him roll another boulder up the hill.

Chris Matthews – Village Idiot


I was gonna write a post about this but somebody beat me to it:

The Misplaced Loyalties and Dubious Code of Chris Matthews

When the average television viewer sees someone on a public-affairs show making arguments about a political controversy, they presume that the speaker believes whatever he or she is saying. That is the conclusion they’re meant to draw. Everyone on TV behaves as if that is the case. But Chris Matthews doesn’t think politicians on TV necessarily owe the audience an accurate accounting of their views. As he sees it, anyone who appears on television and is identified as a supporter of President Obama or the Democratic Party is compelled to articulate the party line, even though they aren’t told what questions they’ll be asked before their appearance.

Why interview “surrogates” at all if their answers are just political theater?

The Hardball host didn’t address that question when discussing a much remarked upon weekend appearance by Newark Mayor Cory Booker on Meet the Press. Identifying himself as an Obama surrogate, Booker generally defended the president and touted his record. When asked what he thought of a TV advertisement by host David Gregory, he also expressed discomfort with attacks on Mitt Romney’s time at the private-equity firm Bain Capital.

There isn’t anything inconsistent about supporting a politician but disagreeing with a campaign tactic used against his opponent. Booker’s comments were nevertheless, in Matthews’ telling, “a betrayal.”

Matthews didn’t merely say they were surprising or unprecedented. He expressed outrage that Booker “chose sides” with private equity rather than Obama. He spoke as if he thinks politicians owe greater loyalty to fellow insiders and establishment norms of behavior than to the American people, even if it means misleading the public about their beliefs on the matter at issue.


The worst part?

Tweety gets paid a lot of money to impersonate a journalist.


Breaking: Ann Romney spends her own money!


LA Times Vets Ann Romney’s Horses

The Los Angeles Times refuses to disclose the contents of a video tape in its possession that reportedly shows Barack Obama lavishing praise on his friend Rashid Khalidi, a close associate of Palestinian terrorist Yasser Arafat, at a 2003 Chicago dinner party sponsored by the Arab American Action Network and attended by Bill Ayers. The Times does, however, have all kinds of time to vet Ann Romney, going so far as to dig into a lawsuit she was part of involving a horse

[...]

At over the 1300 words — which is 1300 more than The Times has given the explosive allegation that the Obama campaign bribed Reverend Wright in 2008 — the piece purports to be a profile of a woman suffering from MS who finds what the headline calls, the “pricey private world” of dressage, therapeutic. But the language of the article is pure sneering smear and an obvious attempt to aid and abet the Obama campaign’s crusade to define the Romneys as out of touch elitists who can’t possibly understand the problems of the average American — you know, like a community organizer turned failed president can.


Yes, it’s true. The Romney’s are rich.

Not George Soros rich. Not John Kerry Rich. Not David Letterman rich. Not even Kennedy rich. But compared to you and me they are doing pretty good.

They’re even rich enough to afford Wagyu beef, just like the Obamas serve in the White House.

BTW – What ever happened to “families are off limits?”


Ann Romney rides horses. Obama eats dogs.


Huh?


Barack Obama:

Well, first of all, I think Cory Booker is an outstanding mayor. He is doing great work in Newark and obviously helping to turn that city around. And I think it’s important to recognize that this issue is not a “distraction.” This is part of the debate that we’re going to be having in this election campaign about how do we create an economy where everybody from top to bottom, folks on Wall Street and folks on Main Street, have a shot at success and if they’re working hard and they’re acting responsibly, that they’re able to live out the American Dream.

Now, I think my view of private equity is that it is set up to maximize profits. And that’s a healthy part of the free market. That’s part of the role of a lot of business people. That’s not unique to private equity. And as I think my representatives have said repeatedly, and I will say today, I think there are folks who do good work in that area. And there are times where they identify the capacity for the economy to create new jobs or new industries, but understand that their priority is to maximize profits. And that’s not always going to be good for communities or businesses or workers.


So, Mr. President, you agree with Mitt Romney? Then why did you bring it up in the first place?

And the reason this is relevant to the campaign is because my opponent, Governor Romney, his main calling card for why he thinks he should be President is his business expertise. He is not going out there touting his experience in Massachusetts. He is saying, I’m a business guy and I know how to fix it, and this is his business.

And when you’re President, as opposed to the head of a private equity firm, then your job is not simply to maximize profits. Your job is to figure out how everybody in the country has a fair shot. Your job is to think about those workers who got laid off and how are we paying for their retraining. Your job is to think about how those communities can start creating new clusters so that they can attract new businesses. Your job as President is to think about how do we set up a equitable tax system so that everybody is paying their fair share that allows us then to invest in science and technology and infrastructure, all of which are going to help us grow.

And so, if your main argument for how to grow the economy is I knew how to make a lot of money for investors, then you’re missing what this job is about. It doesn’t mean you weren’t good at private equity, but that’s not what my job is as President. My job is to take into account everybody, not just some. My job is to make sure that the country is growing not just now, but 10 years from now and 20 years from now.

So to repeat, this is not a distraction. This is what this campaign is going to be about — is what is a strategy for us to move this country forward in a way where everybody can succeed? And that means I’ve got to think about those workers in that video just as much as I’m thinking about folks who have been much more successful.


Okay, Mr. Preezy, fair enough. Running the country is not like running a business. It’s not like community organizing either. But it seems to me like you are saying that what Romney did at Bain Capital was okay. That’s not what your campaign ads are saying.

BTW – Mitt Romney has experience at running a state, too. He even enacted health care reform while he was at it. Do you care to comment on that?

Hello? Hello?

Where did the Preezy go?


Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt cannot/will not answer questions on private equity hypocrisy:


We wouldn’t want him to run on his own record, would we?


Facing Criticism, Obama Defends Ads Attacking Romney’s Record at Bain Capital

Responding to criticism from some Democratic supporters, President Obama said Monday that attacks on Mitt Romney’s experience at Bain Capital were fair game and that Mr. Romney’s years at the helm of a private equity firm were worthy of serious debate.

“This is not a distraction,” Mr. Obama said about Mr. Romney’s record at Bain during a news conference at the end of the NATO summit meeting here. “This is what this campaign is going to be about.”


Because we wouldn’t want Obama to have to run on his own record, now would we?

Don’t get me wrong – Romney’s record is fair game. But if we’re going to look at his management of Bain Capital let’s get some perspective.

During Romney’s tenure with Bain Capital, how many companies did they invest in? How many of them went bankrupt? Why did they go bankrupt? How many workers got laid off by Bain? How many jobs were created by Bain?

The downside of the free market is competition means there will be winners AND losers. If you build a better mousetrap you’ll put the old mousetrap manufacturers out of business. That’s good for you and your employees, but it’s not so great for your competitors and their workers.

Free-market capitalism is the best wealth-creating mechanism ever created. But over the short term its effects can be brutal and unregulated capitalism leads to all kinds of abuses. Government’s job is to ameliorate the negative effects and to provide a safety net for those thrown out of work by market forces. But if government is allowed to start picking winners and losers it inevitably leads to crony capitalism.

Government should not socialize risk but it should allow limitations on liability. That is what corporate structure is designed to do – limit liability. If a company goes bankrupt the investor loses his/her investment but is not liable for any additional amount.

Imagine if you bought 100 shares of Solyndra at $10 per share. Your investment would be $1000. A year or so later Solyndra goes bankrupt, owing over $500 million to the government. Without limited liability you would not only lose your $1000 investment but the government could go after all your assets – your savings, your home – everything you own.

People on the left have developed a very negative knee-jerk reaction to business. If you want proof just look at their loathing of the business-friendly DLC. This is perhaps understandable but not necessarily desirable. Labor and big business are not enemies, they are symbiotes. They NEED each other. Unfortunately it is often a love-hate relationship.

It is easy to demagogue and demonize. All you have to do is cherry-pick the facts you use. Objective assessment is more difficult.


Tweety shows his true colors:



#twittergulag


Twitchy reports another misuse of Spam-block features by Obots to shut down opposing voices. The first example of this was when some pro-Hillary Google blogs were shut down during the 2008 campaign. A few weeks ago conservative blogger Chris Loesch had his Twitter account suspended due to multiple users abusing the spam/block feature to trigger an automatic suspension.

Last night several anti-Obama Twitter users (including our own angienc) were mysteriously suspended. So far only one has been reinstated.

Here is what Twitchy recommends if it happens to you:

Some steps to remember if you get Twitter Gulag’ed.

1. File a ticket. Twitter can’t help unless you do this.

2. Take screenshots if possible. Make a list of the Twitter users you were tweeting with before your suspension and note the subjects you were discussing.

3. Give Twitter a little time — at least 24-48 hours.

4. Notify @FreeChrisLoesch and @TWlTTERGULAG, two accounts that keep running tallies of users trapped in #twittergulag.

5. Make noise! Keep making noise!


Beginning with the Great Purge of DailyKos back in 2007-2008, Obama’s brownshirt bullies authoritarian followers have shown over and over that they are unable to tolerate any dissent. Just ask Cory Booker.


O-ba-ma! O-ba-ma! O-ba-ma!


Curiouser and Curiouser


Directorblue:

Barack Obama’s biographical brief edited repeatedly over 17 years, but Kenyan birthplace changed just weeks after his presidential run announced

The biography provided by Barack Obama to his literary agent specified his birthplace as “Kenya”. And, over the course of 17 years, despite multiple revisions by Obama, the Kenyan birthplace remained a fundamental part of the bio on the agent’s website.

[...]

Old media’s feeble handling of this issue — parroting the laughable assertion that clerical errors caused Obama’s birthplace to be incorrectly listed, when former clients and the agency’s policy itself states that authors provide the biographical briefs — is pathetic.

As I’ve demonstrated here, Obama’s bio was carefully edited over the course of 17 years to reflect his various accomplishments.

It was only a few months after his presidential candidacy was announced that his Kenyan “birthplace” became Hawaiian to confirm his eligibility for office. Obama remains a client to this day, which helps explain the literary agent’s willingness to instantly offer an explanation for the discrepancy.

Only a Kool-aid-swilling hack or a Democrat-media drone — but I repeat myself — would buy into the literary agent’s lame excuse.


First of all let me state unequivocally that I believe that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. The question here is whether he lied in the past about his birthplace.

Back in 1991 (pre-internet for most people) Obama’s literary agent put together a booklet containing the biographical information of all their clients. At that time Obama was not an unpublished writer, he was a writer who hadn’t even written anything yet. He did have a book deal (for which he had received a hefty advance) for a book on race in America.

Here is what the booklet said about Obama:

Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii. The son of an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister, he attended Columbia University and worked as a financial journalist and editor for Business International Corporation. He served as project coordinator in Harlem for the New York Public Interest Research Group, and was Executive Director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago’s South Side. His commitment to social and racial issues will be evident in his first book, Journeys in Black and White.


This wasn’t just some company newsletter they typed up and xeroxed. They spent a little time, effort and coin:

The booklet, which is thirty-six pages long, is printed in blue ink (and, on the cover, silver/grey ink), using offset lithography. It purports to celebrate the fifteenth anniversary of Acton & Dystel, which was founded in 1976.


There is no plausible source for the information contained in that bio other than Obama himself. But let’s assume for the sake of argument that Obama submitted accurate information and the agency mistakenly wrote down his birthplace as Kenya anyway.

We are supposed to believe that the agency never asked Obama to proofread what they wrote prior to having this fancy-schmantzy booklet printed up. Or if they did he never read it. We also have to believe that they never sent a copy of the finished booklet to Obama or if they did he never read it.

Remember when you got your first phone? When the new phone books came out the first thing you did was look yourself up, didn’t you? Are we supposed to believe that a narcissist like Obama didn’t bother to look at his own bio?

But okay, shit happens. I have checked and rechecked documents and essays and then found typos in the final version. But now we learn that this information (now posted on the agency’s website) has been updated repeatedly but the birthplace error was somehow never corrected until 2007 when Obama decided to run for president.

So here are some of my questions:

1. Where did the original information come from?

2. Are there any notes or documents remaining from the drafting/editing process?

3. Who did the revisions/updates on the agency’s website?

4. Were there any communications between the agency and Obama regarding his bio?

5. If so, when?

6. If so, are there any letters, faxes or other documents showing or relating to these communications?

7. Who changed in information in 2007 and why?

Inquiring minds want to know.



I hate Mondays open thread


I just woke up. Here’s a fresh thread for you to play with until I find something halfway interesting to post about.


The Long Run: How the Mormon Church Shaped Mitt Romney


Jodi Kantor in the New York Times:

Romney’s Faith, Silent but Deep

When Mitt Romney embarked on his first political race in 1994, he also slipped into a humble new role in the Mormon congregation he once led. On Sunday mornings, he stood in the sunlit chapel here teaching Bible classes for adults.

Leading students through stories about Jesus and the Nephite and Lamanite tribes, who Mormons believe once populated the Americas, and tossing out peanut butter cups as rewards, Mr. Romney always returned to the same question: how could students apply the lessons of Mormon scripture in their daily lives?

Now, as the presumptive Republican nominee for president, Mr. Romney speaks so sparingly about his faith — he and his aides frequently stipulate that he does not impose his beliefs on others — that its influence on him can be difficult to detect.

But dozens of the candidate’s friends, fellow church members and relatives describe a man whose faith is his design for living. The church is by no means his only influence, and its impact cannot be fully untangled from that of his family, which is also steeped in Mormonism.


Okay, fair is fair – When is the NYT gonna do a story about how Rev. Wright’s Trinity United Church shaped Barack Obama?


The United States of AmeriKKKa

(Jump ahead to the 5:15 mark)


You can’t make this shit up:

The U.S. has gotten more racist, Obama critics are proof

It could be argued that the United States has made significant strides in eliminating racial inequality during the last several decades. However, according to some, the country has actually been backtracking all along.

On HBO’s “Real Time” on Friday, host Bill Maher and Jeremy Scahill of The Nation magazine argued that society is becoming more racist, citing — among other transgressions — recent criticism of President Barack Obama.

SCAHILL: When you start talking about that, it raises for me how incredibly racist our society is becoming. I mean, it’s been racist for a very long time, but it’s coming to the fore. When Martin Luther King walked through –
CNBC’S MICHELLE CARUSO-CABRERA: We have a black president. How can we be racist?
SCAHILL: He’s got more death threats than any president in U.S. history. I mean, the stop and frisk stuff in New York is disproportionately targeting black kids and Latino kids, the “Stand Your Ground” law in Florida is racist, and it’s meant to target people of color.
MAHER: Just the fact that we have one person in that big job — I agree it is a big job, it doesn’t mean that we’re in a post-racial world does it?
CARUSO-CABRERA: Would you at least acknowledge that we’ve gotten less racist, that civil rights was accomplished, that we’ve gotten places here?
SCAHILL: I think it’s getting more racist. I think the tea party plays into that. I think the fact that we have a black president has brought out the racism in a lot of white people in this country, and they were keeping it in their pocket when Bush was in the White House. It’s full-blown on the scene now.


And they call us rednecks “low-information voters”!

The head of the Secret Service debunked the death threats urban legend back in December 2009:

The director of the Secret Service today disputed widely-reported claims that President Obama is receiving more death threats than previous presidents.

At a congressional hearing into the White House security breach that took place last week, when Tareq and Michaele Salahi “crashed” the White House state dinner, Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan said the current threat level against the president is normal.

“The threats right now … is the same level as it has been for the previous two presidents at this point in their administrations,” Sullivan said.


Jeremy Scahill is an investigative journolist and he doesn’t bother fact-checking his own statements? Tsk, tsk.

I’m not going to defend NYPD’s stop and frisk policy but I will point out that any police effort that targets high-crime neighborhoods is inevitably going to affect a disproportionate number of minorities because they are disproportionately the residents of those neighborhoods.

Even so, the NYPD is just one police department out of thousands across the country. Not only that but NYC is one of the bluest spots on the political map. It’s not exactly a bastion of the Tea Party movement.

As for the Florida SYG law being racist and meant to target people of color, Scahill must of pulled that out of his ass because I don’t know where else it could have come from.

Does racism still exist in this country? Certainly. But our nation is far less racist than it was when I was born. Segregation and racial discrimination have been outlawed, and public displays of racism (by white people) are now socially unacceptable.

The country is not becoming more racist, but it is becoming more racialized. And that is not the fault of the Tea Party or the GOP. It is the fault of Obama and his progressive supporters who made playing the race card a central focus of his campaign and presidency.

They dealt that card from the bottom of the deck. It was first used to drive a wedge between Hillary Clinton and the black community just before the South Carolina primary, where 55% of registered Democrats are black. Obama continued to use the race card as a sword and shield throughout the primary and general campaigns, not only using it to deflect any and all criticism but also to attack his opponents and their supporters.

Playing the race card didn’t end with the campaign. It has remained a central part of Obama’s governing strategy as well as his perpetual reelection campaign. In Obama’s post-racial America, the only thing that matters is race.

This worries me, because identity politics and the melting pot are mutually exclusive. The United States has never been a place where people carry grudges. In Ireland, the former Yugoslavia, Africa and the Middle East we have seen people fighting and killing each over religious and ethnic grievances that go back centuries. When people moved here they left their old hatreds behind.

Ever been in a relationship with someone who can’t ever forgive or forget anything, including things that happened before you ever met them? If you have you know that such relationships are doomed to fail. You can never be perfect enough to convince them to let go of the past.

Eventually you quit trying.



NAACP Passes Resolution in Support of Marriage Equality


NAACP press release:


The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People today released a resolution supporting marriage equality. At a meeting of the 103-year old civil rights group’s board of directors, the organization voted to support marriage equality as a continuation of its historic commitment to equal protection under the law.

“The mission of the NAACP has always been to ensure the political, social and economic equality of all people,” said Roslyn M. Brock, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the NAACP. “We have and will oppose efforts to codify discrimination into law.”

“Civil marriage is a civil right and a matter of civil law. The NAACP’s support for marriage equality is deeply rooted in the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and equal protection of all people” said Benjamin Todd Jealous, President and CEO of the NAACP.


Under other circumstances I would applaud this without question as a long overdue positive step, but I guess I’m getting cynical in my old age. I also have to wonder what the result of a vote by the whole NAACP membership would be?

I don’t expect a big public fight about this because they don’t want to embarrass Obama, but I don’t expect black social conservatives to budge on the issue of gay marriage. I also don’t think the black community will be happy with the comparison of gay marriage to civil rights.


Karma’s a b**ch


Lee Habeeb:

Obama’s Oprah Problem

She didn’t see it coming. One day, Oprah Winfrey turned around, and her nationally syndicated show was sliding in the ratings, and her audience was fleeing en masse. And it happened soon after a day she thought was one of the best in her life.

Isn’t that how all the giants fall? When they least expect it?

It was the day Oprah announced she was backing the African-American candidate, then-senator Barack Obama, over the highly qualified and experienced woman candidate, then-senator Hillary Clinton.

It was the first time that Oprah put her brand on a political candidate. And her audience was expecting a very different choice.

Oprah appeared on Larry King Live in May 2007, flush with pride, and was asked the questions lots of women in her audience had on their minds.

“Is there a side of you, the woman side, that would lead toward a Hillary?” King inquired.

“Well, I have great respect for Hillary Clinton,” Oprah said. I think I’ve said this before, and it’s true: Because I am for Barack does not mean I am against Hillary or anybody else.”

So much for the sisterhood!

And so much for that Oprah honesty that her mostly female — and mostly white — audience had come to expect all of those years.

Oprah had chosen the less-qualified, less-experienced black man over the more-qualified, more-experienced white woman. It didn’t take long for Oprah to feel the backlash.

Hell hath no fury like millions of women scorned.


The best part?

Oprah got a heaping helping of cold shoulder after Obama took office.

Alice Palmer could have warned her.



Liar, Liar, Pants On Fire


Why would Barack Obama lie about being born in Kenya when he was really born in Hawaii?

Breitbart News has obtained a promotional booklet produced in 1991 by Barack Obama’s then-literary agency, Acton & Dystel, which touts Obama as “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.”

The booklet, which was distributed to “business colleagues” in the publishing industry, includes a brief biography of Obama among the biographies of eighty-nine other authors represented by Acton & Dystel.

It also promotes Obama’s anticipated first book, Journeys in Black and White–which Obama abandoned, later publishing Dreams from My Father instead.


This is no birther blog – we don’t smoke that shit around here. I have no doubt in my mind that Obama was indeed born in Hawaii and is a natural born citizen.

This story barely broke before the Obama campaign and the media (but I repeat myself) rushed to claim it was a resurgence of birtherism. Miriam Goderich promptly issued the following statement:

“You’re undoubtedly aware of the brouhaha stirred up by Breitbart about the erroneous statement in a client list Acton & Dystel published in 1991 (for circulation within the publishing industry only) that Barack Obama was born in Kenya. This was nothing more than a fact checking error by me — an agency assistant at the time. There was never any information given to us by Obama in any of his correspondence or other communications suggesting in any way that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii. I hope you can communicate to your readers that this was a simple mistake and nothing more.”


That’s the mother of all fact checking errors. Who wrote the original copy? If Obama didn’t write it, who did? Are we supposed to believe that a narcissist like Obama didn’t review his own bio?

This was 1991 – Obama was still a nobody. Back then his sole claim to fame was getting chosen as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review. He had a book deal but no book.

This is what got written in his bio:

Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii. The son of an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister, he attended Columbia University and worked as a financial journalist and editor for Business International Corporation. He served as project coordinator in Harlem for the New York Public Interest Research Group, and was Executive Director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago’s South Side. His commitment to social and racial issues will be evident in his first book, Journeys in Black and White.

In that one paragraph there are several misstatements. Barack Obama Sr. was a senior economist for the Kenyan Ministry of Finance, not a finance minister. A minister is like a cabinet secretary. Obama’s positions with NYPIRG and the Developing Communities Project may have carried a fancy title but it was basically just him being a “community organizer.”

But wait! There’s more!

Jack Cashill:

The most interesting “tell” in the 1991 Acton & Dystel brochure relates to what was said about Obama’s career in the business world. Obama, the reader learns, “worked as a financial journalist and editor for Business International Corporation.”

In Dreams from My Father, Obama inflated his stint at Business International even more and transformed it into a faux moment of racial awareness, one of at least a half-dozen concocted racial melodramas in the book. As Obama tells the story, a “consulting house to multinational corporations” hired him and promptly promoted him to the position of “financial writer.”

Here, he felt like “a spy behind enemy lines,” and a guilty one at that. “As far as I could tell,” he adds, “I was the only black man in the company.” He does not boast of his racial uniqueness. Rather, in full grievance mode, he considers it “a source of shame.” Indeed, the whole experience troubled him:

I had my own office, my own secretary, money in the bank. Sometimes, coming out of an interview with Japanese financiers or German bond traders, I would catch my reflection in the elevator doors-see myself in a suit and tie, a briefcase in my hand-and for a split second I would imagine myself as a captain of industry, barking out orders, closing the deal, before I remembered who it was that I had told myself I wanted to be and felt pangs of guilt for my lack of resolve.

As early as July 2005, however, former co-worker and Obama fan Dan Armstrong revealed Obama’s whole account to be a “serious exaggeration.” Obama worked at not a multinational corporation, but a “small company that published newsletters.” He was not the only black person who worked there. He did not, as claimed, have his own office, wear a jacket and tie, interview international businessmen, or write articles. He mostly just copy-edited business items and slipped them into a three-ring binder for the company’s customers.

Are we supposed to believe that Goderich not only changed Obama’s birthplace from Hawaii to Kenya, but also transformed him from a grunt filling three-ring binders into a “financial journalist and editor”?


Who hasn’t puffed-up a résumé a little bit? But this goes beyond that. For one thing, this kind of stuff is among the characteristics of narcissism:

Pretending to be more important than they really are
Bragging (subtly but persistently) and exaggerating their achievements
Claiming to be an “expert” at many things


One last piece of data: In Dreams From My Father Obama admits that while at Punahou School, the fancy prep school he attended with the children of Hawaii’s rich and powerful, he told people that his father was an African prince.

Are you starting to see a pattern?

Unlike Obama, I never went on some years-long journey of self-discovery trying to figure out who I am. That journey is what Dreams is supposedly all about. But as we have already learned, many of the people in that memoir are fake “composites” and the events he describes didn’t take place.

Obama is not only pretentious, he is pretend-tious. At Punahou School he was low on the social status totem pole compared to the other children. So he claims to be the son of an African Prince. As he grows older he cultivates a persona that is exotic and international. He wears a sarong, quotes TS Eliot and listens to jazz.

Early on his lies are easy to tell and hard to check. Later on, not so much. So he begins trying to clean up his history. But the problem is he has created a paper trail, and now that he is world famous there is no place to hide.

Luckily for him the media is doing their best to protect him.


”Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive”


TGIF Open Thread


Check out the shoes Carrie is wearing in this video! The pair at the very end are awesome.

I went to the doctor today. The doctor said I’ll probably live until my next visit. How is your day going?

Here’s another American Idol alum:



Facebook IPO


Did you invest your life savings in Facebook today? I hope not.

Facebook IPO: More whimper than bang

After all that hype, Facebook (FB) shares were up only modestly in the first few hours of trading. The biggest ever initial public offering by an Internet company was delayed for half an hour due to a glitch at the Nasdaq exchange, while eager crowds of gawkers outside the exchange’s Times Square storefront waited for the open.

With Facebook co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg ceremoniously — and virtually — “ringing” the bell on the Nasdaq Stock Market from the company’s Menlo Park, Calif., headquarters, Facebook’s stock opened around $43 and quickly slipped to under $39, after pricing on Thursday at $38 a share.

The offering, which raised $16 billion for Facebook, caps a meteoric ascent for the company, which Zuckerberg famously launched from his Harvard University dorm only eight years ago. Since then, and despite its fair share of hiccups and persistent questions about the company’s long-term growth prospects, Facebook has grown into a global communications platform with more than 900 million users, or roughly 1 in 8 people on Earth.


How much is Facebook really worth? I dunno, but I suspect it’s a lot less than people think. Obviously anything that reaches 900 million people has some value, the question is how much?

There are only three ways for Facebook to make money. They can charge users for their service. They can sell advertising. They can sell their customers’ information to someone else.

Right now Facebook is free. How many people would stay on Facebook if they started charging $5 month? What about $25? $50? Blogging on WordPress is free, but if they started charging to own a blog you guys would have to start paying the freight or say good-bye to this obnoxious Klown.

How much is advertising on Facebook worth? That kinda depends on the size and number of ads. But with 900 million users, charging 1/100th of a cent per hit would generate a nice monthly revenue. On the other hand, too many ads will turn people off. So there has to be an upper limit on ad revenue.

What about selling your personal data? How much would advertisers be will to pay to target you with their products? Especially when Google, Yahoo and every other online service provider is selling the same thing?

Here’s my prediction: Facebook stock will eventually crash but not burn. Like I said it’s not worthless. But sooner or later the Shiny New Thing will arrive. So my advice to Facebook investors is get in, get out, and don’t mess your hair up.

As of this moment, Facebook is trading at $40.32 a share.


There are none so blind as those who will not see


Most of the evidence in The People vs. George Zimmerman has been released. The only thing that appears to be missing are Zimmerman’s statements to the cops and some of the gory autopsy photos and pictures of the body at the scene. Here are 46 color photos taken by the police. I don’t see the point of trying to recreate the wheel so if you want a detailed discussion of what’s in there see Talk Left or Tom Maguire at Just One Minute.

Long story short – there’s not a damn thing in there that disputes Zimmerman’s claim of self defense.

But I don’t want to talk about the evidence.  I want to talk about no evidence.

From the beginning of this case there have been people who rushed to judgment and proclaimed that Zimmerman stalked and executed Trayvon Martin because of the color of his skin. Many of them still cling bitterly to that belief.

There is no evidence that Zimmerman focused on Trayvon because of his race. It is irrelevant that Neighborhood Watch guidelines say not to carry weapons – Zimmerman was on his way to the store, not patrolling the condo complex. It was not a crime for Zimmerman to get out of his vehicle and follow Trayvon. The fact that this tragedy may have been “avoidable” is also not relevant to whether or not a crime was committed.

Much has been made of the Sanford PD’s “failure” to arrest Zimmerman on the night of the shooting or in the weeks that followed. That is wrong. First of all, “failure” implies a duty not performed. The police do not have a duty to arrest unless a warrant has been issued or if they have probable cause to believe a crime has been committed.

Not all killings are crimes. If a store clerk shoots a robber or a homeowner blows away a burglar, the police would not normally arrest that person. Although this case is less clear-cut, the same principle applies. Contrary to what some people seem to believe, the court system is not about determining what really happened.

The court system is intended to determine whether guilt beyond a reasonable doubt has been shown. Guilty people go free every day due to a lack of evidence. The decision whether or not to bring charges is in the exclusive power of the prosecutor. The police merely gather evidence and make recommendations. If the police arrest someone the prosecutor must file charges within two working days or the person is released.

I have seen numerous people suggest that there has been some kind of massive cover-up in this case. There is no evidence of that, nor does it appear that there were any major investigative errors.

Trials are all about evidence, not speculation. Nonetheless, some people keep asserting theories of what “must” have happened based on absolutely no evidence at all. They insist that Zimmerman is guilty because he initiated the incident.  But they have no evidence to support their theories.

Zimmerman claims that Trayvon confronted him and then attacked him. There is no evidence or witness that contradicts that claim. Some people claim that Trayvon was defending himself from a stalker. Let’s assume for a moment that Zimmerman caught up to Trayvon and confronted him. Let’s even speculate that he grabbed Trayvon’s arm and tried to detain him.

Trayvon would be justified in using reasonable force to escape. What is reasonable? Punching Zimmerman once and knocking him down would be reasonable. Jumping on top of him and pummeling his would not be reasonable.

But that scenario is just speculation anyway. There is no evidence that is how the incident took place. Even if you totally disregard Zimmerman’s version of events there is no evidence that Zimmerman initiated the altercation.

If a jury views all the evidence and concludes that the most likely scenario is that Zimmerman is guilty but that it is reasonably POSSIBLE that he is innocent, they must vote to acquit. In order to convict they jury must agree that there is no reasonable explanation of the evidence except guilt.

I don’t expect this evidence release to change any minds. There are none so blind as those who will not see.



Big boys don’t cry


Today’s shiny new thing:

G.O.P. ‘Super PAC’ Weighs Hard-Line Attack on Obama

A group of high-profile Republican strategists is working with a conservative billionaire on a proposal to mount one of the most provocative campaigns of the “super PAC” era and attack President Obama in ways that Republicans have so far shied away from.

Timed to upend the Democratic National Convention in September, the plan would “do exactly what John McCain would not let us do,” the strategists wrote.

The plan, which is awaiting approval, calls for running commercials linking Mr. Obama to incendiary comments by his former spiritual adviser, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., whose race-related sermons made him a highly charged figure in the 2008 campaign.

“The world is about to see Jeremiah Wright and understand his influence on Barack Obama for the first time in a big, attention-arresting way,” says the proposal, which was overseen by Fred Davis and commissioned by Joe Ricketts, the founder of the brokerage firm TD Ameritrade. Mr. Ricketts is increasingly putting his fortune to work in conservative politics.

The $10 million plan, one of several being studied by Mr. Ricketts, includes preparations for how to respond to the charges of race-baiting it envisions if it highlights Mr. Obama’s former ties to Mr. Wright, who espouses what is known as “black liberation theology.”

The group suggested hiring as a spokesman an “extremely literate conservative African-American” who can argue that Mr. Obama misled the nation by presenting himself as what the proposal calls a “metrosexual, black Abe Lincoln.”

A copy of a detailed advertising plan was obtained by The New York Times through a person not connected to the proposal who was alarmed by its tone. It is titled “The Defeat of Barack Hussein Obama: The Ricketts Plan to End His Spending for Good.”


How exactly did this person get their hands on a copy of the proposal? It’s not the kind of thing you leave laying around. I smell a mole.

However it was obtained (and assuming it wasn’t a hoax) that’s all it is – a proposal. But let’s assume they really are planning a prison rules campaign. Boo-fucking-hoo. Did Obama really think the GOP was just gonna moan and lay there again? Besides, fair is fair – how much money has Obama’s superpac raised? Are they the ones paying to vet the people in Romney videos?

I seriously doubt that the Republicans could come up with anything uglier than the campaign against Sarah Palin.

Meanwhile, Mitt Romney:

“I repudiate the effort by that PAC to promote an ad strategy of the nature they’ve described. I would like to see this campaign focus on the economy, on getting people back to work, on seeing rising incomes and growing prosperity — particularly for those in the middle class of America. And I think what we’ve seen so far from the Obama campaign is a campaign of character assassination. I hope that isn’t the course of this campaign. So in regards to that PAC, I repudiate what they’re thinking about … It’s interesting that we’re talking about some Republican PAC that wants to go after the president [on Wright]; I hope people also are looking at what he’s doing, and saying ‘why is he running an attack campaign? Why isn’t he talking about his record?’”


He reminds me of that guy who runs really nasty campaigns but pretends to be above the fray – the one who always lets his surrogates do the dirty work. What was his name again? Barry something.


UPDATE:

From Hot Air:

On Thursday afternoon, the Ending Spending Action Fund super-PAC, run by billionaire Chicago Cubs owner Joe Ricketts, put out a statement rejecting the plan to spend $10 million to link Obama and Wright in a “big, attention-arresting way.”

The proposal “reflects an approach to politics that Mr. Ricketts rejects and it was never a plan to be accepted but only a suggestion for a direction to take. Mr. Ricketts intends to work hard to help elect a President this fall who shares his commitment to economic responsibility, but his efforts are and will continue to be focused entirely on questions of fiscal policy, not attacks that seek to divide us socially or culturally,” according to a statement from the Ending Spending Action Fund.


So this gets to be the shiny new thing of the day but Ricketts didn’t have to spend any money on it?

Smart.



Obamandias


Obamandias*

I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desart. Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed:
And on the pedestal these words appear:
“My name is Obamandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!”
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.


This is an open thread.


*(With apologies to Percy Bysshe Shelly)

Are you kidding me?


Politico:

Records: Iowa man in Romney video did jail time for assault of a peace officer

Jason Clausen, a Mason City, Iowa, man featured in Mitt Romney’s new video featuring unemployed people has a lengthy rap sheet and served ten days in jail for “assault on a peace officer,” public records show.

Clause is seen in the video “A few of the 23 million” saying, “When the economy went bad a month after my divorce, I lost my job, I lost my house.” He and his wife filed for a dissolution of their marriage, records show, in January 2009, months after the economy started tanking.

According to public records, a Jason Clausen with his birthdate was found guilty of “assault on peace officers and others” on Feb. 28, 2005. He was sentenced to 120 days in jail, with 110 of those days suspended. He was given 730 days of probation and paid $845 in fines, records show. Iowa Department of Corrections records show he was on probation for “a serious misdemeanor” until April 3, 2006.

The records show Clausen had nearly 20 busts, tickets or fines, a number of them traffic infractions related to things like driving while intoxicated, or with a suspended license. Some were related to accidents, others to driving without seat belts.

Clausen could not be reached for comment.


The Romney campaign made an ad video showing some people in Iowa who are suffering under the current economy. So the Obama campaign/media responds by vetting the people in the video.

This is really creepy, authoritarian stuff. Is this what we want to see – anyone who opposes Obama or supports Romney being placed under a microscope? Romney himself is fair game, but do all of his supporters need to worry about having their entire lives exposed to public view?

Meanwhile, we still haven’t seen Obama’s college transcripts.

UPDATE:

This information about Mr. Clausen does not disprove the basic story in the video – that he separated from his wife and lost his job after the economy tanked. The Politico article does not demonstrate any connection between his minor criminal record and his current difficulties.

Candidates are always fair game for vetting. The same thing generally applies to their close friends and major financial backers because those people are relevant to the candidate’s character – honest, decent people don’t consort with terrorists and crooks. The dirty laundry of some minor supporter in not relevant to anything.

Has Mr. Clausen even met Mitt Romney?


I am not a demographic


Straight White Male: The Lowest Difficulty Setting There Is

I’ve been thinking of a way to explain to straight white men how life works for them, without invoking the dreaded word “privilege,” to which they react like vampires being fed a garlic tart at high noon. It’s not that the word “privilege” is incorrect, it’s that it’s not their word. When confronted with “privilege,” they fiddle with the word itself, and haul out the dictionaries and find every possible way to talk about the word but not any of the things the word signifies.

So, the challenge: how to get across the ideas bound up in the word “privilege,” in a way that your average straight white man will get, without freaking out about it?

Being a white guy who likes women, here’s how I would do it:

Dudes. Imagine life here in the US — or indeed, pretty much anywhere in the Western world — is a massive role playing game, like World of Warcraft except appallingly mundane, where most quests involve the acquisition of money, cell phones and donuts, although not always at the same time. Let’s call it The Real World. You have installed The Real World on your computer and are about to start playing, but first you go to the settings tab to bind your keys, fiddle with your defaults, and choose the difficulty setting for the game. Got it?

Okay: In the role playing game known as The Real World, “Straight White Male” is the lowest difficulty setting there is.


I confess – I am a straight white man. I can’t help it, I was born this way. Do I have it easier than some people? Without a doubt. Do some people have it easier than me? Oh, you betcha!

But I’m a person, not a demographic. There are a lot of other characteristics that define me besides race, gender and sexual orientation. I am left-handed. I went to a public school. I am college educated with a post-grad degree. I live in California and I am an American citizen. I was born in Germany. I am a military veteran. I am overweight and suffer from male-pattern baldness. I am in my fifties.

Assuming I enjoy some kind of privilege, exactly what am I supposed to do about it? Am I supposed to let all non-white, non-straight, non-males go ahead of me in line? How privileged am I compared to Sasha and Malia Obama? Should they get preference for jobs or college admissions over my grandsons? Money is the best privilege to have and I don’t have it.

I didn’t ask for any privileges. If I apply for a job I want to compete with the other applicants on a level playing field. But even though the field is level, some players will always be bigger/stronger/smarter/faster than the others. That’s life.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29 other followers