“Illegal Alien” is an accurate descriptive term

illegal immigrants


David “M-m-m-my” Sirota at Salon:

There are no “illegal immigrants”

As one of the world’s largest news outlets, the Associated Press’s linguistic mandates significantly shape the broader vernacular. So when the organization this week decided to stop using the term “illegal immigrant,” it was a big victory for objectivity and against the propagandistic language of bigotry.

Cautious AP executives did not frame it exactly that way. Instead, editor Kathleen Carroll portrayed the decision as one in defense of grammar, saying that the term “illegal” properly “describe(s) only an action” and that it is not an appropriate label to describe a human being.

“Illegal,” of course, has been used as more than a mere label — it has for years been used as an outright epithet by xenophobes. They abhor the notion of America becoming more diverse — and specifically, more non-white — and so they have tried to convert “illegal” into a word that specifically dehumanizes Latinos. Thus, as any honest person can admit, when Republican politicians and media blowhards decry “illegals,” they are pretending to be for a race-blind enforcement of immigration laws, but they are really signaling their hatred of Latino culture.

How can we be so sure that dog-whistle bigotry is the intent? It’s simple, really. Just listen to who is — and who is not — being called an “illegal.”

Almost nobody uses the term to attack white immigrants from Europe or Canada who overstay their visas. Nobody uses the term to describe white people who break all sorts of criminal laws. Indeed, nobody called Louisiana Republican Sen. David Vitter an “illegal” upon revelations about his connection to a prostitution service, nor did anyone call Bernie Madoff an “illegal” for his Ponzi schemes.

Instead, the word is exclusively used to denigrate Latinos who entered the country without authorization. Coincidence? Hardly, especially because the term “illegal” is used to describe Latinos whose immigration status is not even a criminal matter.


What’s the catch-all term for people who operate motor vehicles while under the influence of alcohol? Where I come from we call them “drunk drivers”. We also call people who dispense illegal narcotics “drug dealers” and guys who break into other people’s houses and take stuff “burglars.” I have heard Vitter and Madoff referred to by derogatory terms like “pervert”, “crook” and “scumbag”.

There are several derogatory terms that refer to Latinos/Hispanics. There is also the old slang term “wetback” that was used to refer to Mexicans who entered the United States without permission. The origin of that term was based on the idea that they had just swum across the Rio Grande to enter Texas. But the term wasn’t accurate because both then and now many of these illegal immigrants crossed on dry land into Arizona or California.

“Illegal immigrant” is an accurate descriptive term. The people it refers to are immigrants who entered the United States illegally. The term illegal immigrant” is not exclusive to Latinos/Hispanics, but they do comprise a majority of the illegal immigrants in this country.

“Undocumented worker” is not an accurate descriptive term. It implies that their only offense was not filling out the proper paperwork. Illegal immigration is somewhat more serious violation than failing to sign the guest book at a party or reception. Some of these people are not here to work but are instead involved in the illegal drug trade.

There is nothing xenophobic about being concerned because millions of people from another nation with a different language and culture are invading our nation, taking jobs and residing in our communities. This is especially true when our economy can’t support all the people who are U.S. citizens.

We have borders. We have immigration laws. Because they enter illegally we don’t know anything about these illegal immigrants, such as whether or not they have criminal records. The fact is most illegal immigrants are not the best and brightest. They are often poor and illiterate. Many of them drive cars without licenses or insurance. When they get in trouble they run back to Mexico and then return here using different names.

I am not anti-immigrant. I spent part of my childhood living on a Del Monte farm labor camp. I actually witnessed a few immigration raids. There are communities here in the Central Valley where the illegal immigrants outnumber everyone else.

We need immigrant labor. But what we need is a regulated flow, not a flood. We need to get immigration under control.

One more thing – just because they come here to work does not mean they have to become citizens or even permanent residents. We should have a program that effectively enables them to cross the border when they are needed and go home when they are not. We need a modern version of the Bracero program.


I seen this coming

illegal immigrants


Joe Moneybags Gazette:

Immigration Reform Roadblock

The bipartisan Gang of Eight Senate talks on immigration are continuing, with avowals that a deal is done or close to it. But we also keep hearing that it may not include a flexible guest-worker program rooted in the realities of the U.S. labor market, and that some Republicans may nonetheless go along for the ride.

Specifically, the AFL-CIO has been insisting on a guest program for low-skilled workers to start at a mere 10,000 visas a year, and the Senators may agree on as few as 20,000. These would be the total number of visas for workers across the entire U.S. economy outside of high-tech or agriculture—the likes of construction, hotels and restaurants, landscaping, among so many others. To put that in perspective, in 2011 the U.S. admitted more than two million temporary workers in a work force of 154 million.

The total number of guest-worker visas would be able to climb in any year to a cap of 200,000, but any number above 20,000 would require passing a complex bureaucratic formula. The details remain fluid, but we hear they may include a low national jobless rate, job openings as measured by the Labor Department’s JOLTS index, and vetting by a new guest-worker commission. The lowest priority under this formula would be what should be the most important—whether an employer is recruiting to fill an open job.

The new commission is especially pernicious because it amounts to a politicized mechanism for unions to interfere in the U.S. labor market. Such a body is sure to be dominated by union appointees or allies who would rarely if ever declare a labor shortage. A major goal of any guest-worker program should be to match employers with willing workers to keep the economy humming, but the last thing unions want is more non-union workers. That’s why unions are also pushing for excessive wage minimums and fees for guest workers.


Immigrant workers and unions are natural born enemies, yet the Democrats have somehow managed to successfully be both pro-union and pro-immigration at the same time. That’s a pretty good trick but sooner or later something had to give.

Unions depend on captive employers when they negotiate for wages and benefits. If employers can easily hire replacement workers (“scabs”) then strikes (or threats thereof) will fail. Historically, immigrants are a primary source of scabs.

Of course when push comes to shove, the unions are gonna win. Union members can (legally) vote, immigrant guest-workers can’t.

Unfortunately for the Republicans they are in no position to exploit this situation.


Silliness


Luis Gutierrez: Who’s The Immigrant, Justin Bieber Or Selena Gomez?

Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) pulled out a secret weapon on Wednesday to talk about the Arizona immigration law and potential for racial profiling: Justin Bieber.

In a speech about the law, SB 1070, the pro-immigration reform congressman showed pictures of Bieber, who is Canadian, along with other celebrities, journalists, athletes and Supreme Court justices who are children of immigrants or immigrants themselves and asked who looks more like an immigrant.

“For our young C-SPAN [viewers]: Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez,” he said on the House floor. “These young people have overcome their very different national origins and became apparently a happy couple. I’m sure Justin helped Gomez learn all about American customs and feel more at home in her adopted country.”

“Oh wait a minute, I’m sorry,” he continued. “Because I’m not a trained Arizona official, I somehow got that backwards. Actually, Ms. Gomez, of Texas, has helped Mr. Bieber, of Canada, learn all about his adopted country. Justin, when you perform in Phoenix, remember to bring your papers.”

The Supreme Court ruled on several elements of SB 1070 earlier this week. Gutierrez applauded the justices for declaring some provisions unconstitutional, but raised questions about the section that will be allowed to go into effect. That piece of the law, sometimes referred to as the “papers, please” provision, will instruct police to ask about immigration status when they have “reasonable suspicion” that a person may be undocumented.

[...]

“We could play this game all day,” he said. “But the point is simple. The idea that any government official can determine who belongs in America and who doesn’t simply by looking at them is completely ridiculous, unfair and un-American.”


First of all, the Arizona law does not permit the police to stop people on suspicion of being here illegally. It specifically states that if the police have stopped someone during a “lawful stop, detention or arrest” AND there is reasonable suspicion that the individual is an illegal immigrant that the police “attempt to determine” an individual’s immigration status.

Remember that Arizona shares a border with Mexico. Thousands of illegal immigrants cross that border on a daily basis. It’s not like encountering illegal aliens is an unusual occurrence.

Generally when the cops stop somebody they ask for identification. If the stop is for a traffic violation they ask for a drivers license and vehicle registration. Illegal aliens can’t get drivers licenses here in the United States.

The cops can’t legally stop someone because of their race. But if they stop someone for some other legitimate reason and they have “specific and articulable facts” that the person is here illegally they can continue to detain them for a reasonable period of time while they investigate.

If they determine there is probable cause to believe the person is here illegally they can contact the Border Patrol or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to determine what to do with the person. If the feds say let them go, the cops have to release the person.

But wait! There’s more!

The Border Patrol and ICE are both part of the federal Department of Homeland Security. It’s their job to enforce immigration laws. They stop and detain people they reasonably suspect of being illegal immigrants. That means they do exactly what Rep. Gutierrez says can’t be done.

BTW – Legal immigrants are required by federal law to keep their immigration papers on them at all times.


This doesn’t add up

Alabama immigration law blamed for drop in construction jobs

Alabama’s construction industry is losing jobs faster than almost every state in the nation, and industry experts say some of the losses are due to the state’s strict new immigration law.

Figures from the Associated General Contractors, an Arlington, Va.-based trade group, showed that construction-related employment in Alabama has fallen from 85,900 in June, when the law was passed, to 80,700 in October.

Construction employment in the Birmingham-Hoover metro declined from 24,900 in June to 23,800 in October, according to AGC figures.

“Some of it has to do with the immigration law,” said Henry Hagood, head of Alabama AGC chapter. “Crews have left the state. That’s not the only reason for the numbers. Our market is down at the bottom. Every little thing, when you don’t have as much work, contributes to it.”

Alabama’s one-month loss of 3.2 percent, or 2,700 construction jobs from September to October, was the second highest nationally, surpassed only by Nevada’s 4.6 percent decline, according to AGC figures.

For the 12-month period ending in October, according to the trade group, Alabama lost 7 percent of its construction jobs, a steeper decline than all but three states — Georgia (9.5 percent), New Mexico (9.2 percent) and Wisconsin (8.6 percent).

John Wyatt, a vice president at Gary C. Wyatt General Contractor in Birmingham, said the immigration law has caused job shortages for construction companies across the state.

“There have been no-show employees in various trades from job sites since the immigration law has taken effect,” he said.


Correlation doesn’t imply causation.

If 1000 Walmart employees suddenly quit, Walmart doesn’t lose 1000 jobs, they have 1000 job openings. Logic would say that in a period of high unemployment in the construction industry there would be plenty of available workers to fill those positions.

But there is another issue here I want to talk about. We always hear that we need illegal immigrants because they take the shitty jobs nobody here will do. Now I don’t know about where you live, but around here construction is considered one of the better blue-collar jobs.

In fact, many of them are union jobs. That means that illegal immigrants are undercutting unions. Democrats are pro-union. Democrats are also pro-immigration. This does not compute. (Republicans oppose both, so at least they get points for consistency)

I know I am committing heresy for even trying to discuss this topic. Left-wing dogma is that illegal immigration is good and anyone who opposes it is a racist xenophobe.

Except I’m not some racist xenophobe. I’ve lived my whole life around immigrants. They are mostly good people. I don’t blame them for coming here because they can make a lot more money. They don’t come here for welfare, they come here to work.

But we need to take care of our own first. Right now the real unemployment rate in this country is about 20%. Add to that the number of people that are underemployed.

Illegal immigration is a complex issue. Before we can fix it, we need to be able to discuss it.



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 270 other followers