Julian Assange’s fate in balance as UK ‘threatens to storm embassy’
The diplomatic and political minefield that is the fate of Julian Assange is expected to come a step closer to being traversed when Ecuador’s president, Rafael Correa, gives his decision on whether his country will grant the WikiLeaks’ founder asylum around lunchtime on Thursday.
The decision – if it comes – will mark the end of a turbulent process that last night saw Ecuador’s foreign minister, Ricardo Patiño, raging against perceived threats from Britain to “storm” the embassy and warning that such a “dangerous precedent” would be met with “appropriate responses in accordance with international law”.
The dramatic development came two months after Assange suddenly walked into the embassy in a bid to avoid being extradited to Sweden, where he faces allegations of sexual assault.
At a press conference yesterday, Patiño released details of a letter he said was delivered through a British embassy official in Quito, the capital of the South American country.
The letter said: “You need to be aware that there is a legal base in the UK, the Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act 1987, that would allow us to take actions in order to arrest Mr Assange in the current premises of the embassy.”
It added: “We need to reiterate that we consider the continued use of the diplomatic premises in this way incompatible with the Vienna convention and unsustainable and we have made clear the serious implications that this has for our diplomatic relations.”
Last night, appeals were tweeted for Assange supporters to occupy the embassy to prevent British police from arresting Assange, and while there was a police presence outside the embassy, Scotland Yard insisted that officers were simply there to “police the embassy like any other embassy”.
Patiño said he was “deeply shocked” by the diplomatic letter. Speaking to reporters later, he said: “The government of Ecuador is considering a request for asylum and has carried out diplomatic talks with the governments of the United Kingdom and Sweden. However, today we received from the United Kingdom a written threat that they could attack our embassy in London if Ecuador does not give up Julian Assange.
“Ecuador, as a state that respects rights and justice and is a democratic and peaceful nation state, rejects in the strongest possible terms the explicit threat of the British official communication.
“This is unbecoming of a democratic, civilised and law-abiding state. If this conduct persists, Ecuador will take appropriate responses in accordance with international law.
“If the measures announced in the British official communication materialise they will be interpreted by Ecuador as a hostile and intolerable act and also as an attack on our sovereignty, which would require us to respond with greater diplomatic force.
“Such actions would be a blatant disregard of the Vienna convention on diplomatic relations and of the rules of international law of the past four centuries.
“It would be a dangerous precedent because it would open the door to the violation of embassies as a declared sovereign space.” Under international law, diplomatic posts are considered the territory of the foreign nation.
Anyone remember when we invaded the sovereign space of Pakistan to “arrest” Osama bin Hidin’? Maybe the Brits should do things the American way and send a drone in to blow his ass up.
1. Two women in Sweden accuse Julian Assange of sexual assault. While the case is under investigation Assange leaves Sweden and goes to England.
2. A warrant for Assange’s arrest is issued in Sweden. Extradition proceedings are started in England.
3. Assange is arrested and then released on bail. As part of his bail conditions he is required to wear an ankle bracelet and live on a large estate belonging to a wealthy supporter.
4. Assange loses his extradition hearing.
5. Assange appeals the extradition ruling.
6. Assange loses his appeal.
7. Assange requests a rehearing.
8. Rehearing is denied. Assange is given a date to turn himself in.
9. Assange goes to Ecuadoran embassy and requests asylum.
According to Assange he has spent all this time, money and effort fighting extradition to Sweden because it is all a plot to send him to the United States so we can execute him even though he denies breaking any laws.
Next month will make two years since this mess started.
Seriously, what would be the repercussions if British police entered the embassy and snatched his ass up and sent him to Skandiland? What’s Ecuador gonna do about it? Declare war?
What gives them the right to keep Assange anyway? He is a fugitive from justice. He’s gone through the legal process and lost. He broke his promise to appear. He is an Australian citizen and Ecuador has nothing to do with the allegations against him.
Imagine if the police in San Diego were chasing a German citizen who was on the run from charges in Japan and who jumped bail after losing an extradition hearing here and they pursued him 100 feet over the border into Mexico before catching him and dragging him back. How upset should Mexico be?
What’s amusing is the people who are suddenly so worried about the sanctity of international law were opposed to enforcing it when Assange was fighting extradition.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: Julian Assange | 61 Comments »