DeOccupyXmas

Demonstrators Plan to Occupy Retailers on Black Friday

Some demonstrators are planning to occupy retailers on Black Friday to protest “the business that are in the pockets of Wall Street.”

Organizers are encouraging consumers to either occupy or boycott retailers that are publicly traded, according to the Stop Black Friday website.


Verum Serum:

Good idea. In fact, here’s an idea for cutting back on shopping this Christmas. It’s something I’m launching now with absolutely no forethought. I’m calling it DeOccupyXmasList. It’s really simple. Here’s the plan. If you have an occupier in your life, scratch them off your Christmas list. That’s it. Your holiday shopping has now been de-occupied. Wasn’t that easy?

Remember, they don’t want anything this year. No new video game consoles or games. No iPhones or iPads. No new cameras or laptops. No cashmere sweaters or hipster hats. No gift certificates to the local head shop and absolutely no cash. Save your filthy capitalist lucre and help your son, daughter, niece, nephew or smelly friend be true to their revolutionary ideals. It’s a win-win scenario.

If you feel you must get something for your Occupy-minded relative or friend, please make sure it’s a local product worth less than $10, so maybe a small bag of oranges. It’s cheap and will help them resist camp scurvy over the winter.


No Occupiers in my family. I raised my kids right – they may be selfish, self-centered brats but they have jobs.

Okay, I admit that two of them supported Obama, but nobody is perfect.


Occupy Long March


Washington Post:

The protesters embarked on the 231-mile-trek with a $3,000 check from Occupy Wall Street. But the marchers soon found they didn’t need the money, as they received donations of food and cash, cigarettes and deodorant from local residents and passersby. Occupy movements also sprang up or grew larger in their wake in places such as New Brunswick and Trenton, N.J.

While some of the original 21 marchers dropped out because of missing toenails, shin splints or fevers, new marchers have since joined, so that more than twice as many protesters will arrive in Washington Tuesday.

On Wednesday, the Occupiers intend to hold a “day of action,” to shut down part of the city in protest of the failure by 12 lawmakers to reach a deal that would ease the tax burden on the “99 percent.”


How many dropped out, how many joined, and where did they join?

But wait! There’s more!

Oops..wrong time to Occupy the super committee

A group of Occupy Wall Street protesters have spent the last two weeks marching 230 miles from New York City to the nation’s capitol. A blast “action alert” emailed this morning describes their plans upon arrival in Washington, DC:

Together we will march to McPherson Square where they will hold a press conference at noon, followed by a General Assembly afterwards to discuss the planned actions. Shortly after, they will march to the Capitol to bring the message of the 99% directly to the Super Committee.

One small problem — the “super committee” has already declared failure and gone home. And the House and Senate adjourned last Friday.


For $3000 they could have chartered a bus, rode in comfort, and arrived in time to harass mic check the super committee.

All is not lost. They can spend Thanksgiving shining the batsignal on the Washington Monument. That’ll show Congress!



Killing the Golden Goose


Occupy Oakland Calls for TOTAL WEST COAST PORT SHUTDOWN ON 12/12

Proposal for a Coordinated West Coast Port Shutdown, Passed With Unanimous Consensus by vote of the Occupy Oakland General Assembly 11/18/2012:

In response to coordinated attacks on the occupations and attacks on workers across the nation:

Occupy Oakland calls for the blockade and disruption of the economic apparatus of the 1% with a coordinated shutdown of ports on the entire West Coast on December 12th. The 1% has disrupted the lives of longshoremen and port truckers and the workers who create their wealth, just as coordinated nationwide police attacks have turned our cities into battlegrounds in an effort to disrupt our Occupy movement.

We call on each West Coast occupation to organize a mass mobilization to shut down its local port. Our eyes are on the continued union-busting and attacks on organized labor, in particular the rupture of Longshoremen jurisdiction in Longview Washington by the EGT. Already, Occupy Los Angeles has passed a resolution to carry out a port action on the Port Of Los Angeles on December 12th, to shut down SSA terminals, which are owned by Goldman Sachs.

Occupy Oakland expands this call to the entire West Coast, and calls for continuing solidarity with the Longshoremen in Longview Washington in their ongoing struggle against the EGT. The EGT is an international grain exporter led by Bunge LTD, a company constituted of 1% bankers whose practices have ruined the lives of the working class all over the world, from Argentina to the West Coast of the US. During the November 2nd General Strike, tens of thousands shutdown the Port Of Oakland as a warning shot to EGT to stop its attacks on Longview. Since the EGT has disregarded this message, and continues to attack the Longshoremen at Longview, we will now shut down ports along the entire West Coast.


Regarding Longview, EGT hired workers from a different union, enraging the longshoremen so much that a federal judge issued a restraining order:

A federal judge ordered union protesters to stop using illegal tactics Thursday as they battle for the right to work at a new grain terminal in Washington state.

U.S. District Judge Ronald Leighton issued a preliminary injunction to restrict union activity, saying there was no defense for the aggressive tactics used in recent days. Protesters twice blocked the pathway of a train carrying grain to the terminal at the Port of Longview on Wednesday, and early Thursday morning hundreds of them stormed the facility, overwhelmed guards, dumped grain and broke windows, police said.

[...]

Six guards were trapped for a couple of hours after at least 500 Longshoremen broke down gates about 4:30 a.m. and smashed windows in the guard shack, Longview Police Chief Jim Duscha said. He initially referred to the guards as “hostages,” but later retracted that after the guards clarified no one had threatened them.

[...]

Most of the protesters returned to their union hall after cutting train brake lines and spilling grain from a car at the EGT terminal, Duscha said. They also pushed a private security vehicle into a ditch.


I understand the Longshoremen’s point of view, but which group of unionized workers are we supposed to support here? As for EGT and Bunge LTD., they export American grain – one of the few things we still sell to other countries.

Now let’s be clear here – this proposed shut-down is not a union strike. This is a group of outsiders trying to close all the ports on the west coast. If successful they will be interfering with the livelihoods of thousands of longshoremen, truck drivers, farmers, warehouse workers, railroad employees and members of the merchant marine.

Now some would argue that these ports are part of a capitalist system that exploits workers. But who would those workers be working for if it wasn’t for the capitalists? Do scab workers feel exploited or lucky to have jobs?

Now here is where we find a dichotomy in progressive thinking:

1. We should support unions because they enable workers to collectively bargain for maximum wages and working conditions.

2. We should support illegal immigration because they take low-paid jobs nobody else wants.


If we really want to help American workers, shouldn’t we oppose illegal immigration? Fewer workers would mean higher wages under the Law of Supply and Demand. Without illegal workers, how many of those jobs would remain low-paid? OTOH, how many of those jobs would remain?

BTW – Why don’t we just raise the minimum wage to $50 hour? Because if we raise wages so high it puts the capitalists out of business, nobody will have jobs.


A man and his wife owned a very special goose. Every day the goose would lay a golden egg, which made the couple very rich.

“Just think,” said the man’s wife, “If we could have all the golden eggs that are inside the goose, we could be richer much faster.”

“You’re right,” said her husband, “We wouldn’t have to wait for the goose to lay her egg every day.”

So, the couple killed the goose and cut her open, only to find that she was just like every other goose. She had no golden eggs inside of her at all, and they had no more golden eggs.

Occupy Post-Mortem

Wait, I wasn't done yet! Mic check! MIC CHECK!


I keep seeing people making statements like this one from Katrina vanden Heuvel:

But Occupy is a protest movement — one that has transformed the landscape of politics, by forcing the country to face the reality of entrenched inequality and power and address what should be done about it.

Seriously? I guess that’s not as over the top as declaring that OWS is just like Christianity minus Christ, but it’s still not accurate.

Occupy Wall Street started slightly over two months ago. What did it accomplish?

Elections won: none

Candidates: none

Legislation: none

Regulations: none (unless you count the new Zuccotti Rules)

Sure, they’ve gotten a lot of airplay lately, but so has Kim Kardashian, and her 72 day marriage lasted longer than the “occupation” of Zuccotti Park. And in both cases the coverage has not been entirely positive.

As for numbers, the highest estimates for last week’s Mother Of All Protests drew less people than the average home game at nearby Yankee Stadium.

Now the latest spin is that OWS isn’t political.

WTF? A non-political protest against government?

Then there are the tin foil hat brigades who are convinced that the media is out to make OWS look bad.

I hate to break it to them, but the Occupiers didn’t need any help in making themselves look bad.

Here is my prediction: The OWS true believers will remain true believers. They will blame others (including us) for the failure of the movement.

Koolaid is a helluva drug.



Occupy Luxury


Occupy Wall Street protesters stay at $700-a-night hotel

Hell no, we won’t go — unless we get goose down pillows.

A key Occupy Wall Street leader and another protester who leads a double life as a businessman ditched fetid tents and church basements for rooms at a luxurious hotel that promises guests can “unleash [their] inner Gordon Gekko,” The Post has learned.

The $700-per-night W Hotel Downtown last week hosted both Peter Dutro, one of a select few OWS members on the powerful finance committee, and Brad Spitzer, a California-based analyst who not only secretly took part in protests during a week-long business trip but offered shelter to protesters in his swanky platinum-card room.

“Tents are not for me,” he confessed, when confronted in the sleek black lobby of the Washington Street hotel where sources described him as a “repeat” guest.

Spitzer, 24, an associate at financial-services giant Deloitte, which netted $29 billion in revenue last year, admitted he joined the protest at Zuccotti Park several times.

[...]

Meanwhile, Dutro, 35, one of only a handful of OWS leaders in charge of the movement’s $500,000 in donations, checked in on Wednesday, the night after police emptied Zuccotti Park.

While hundreds of his rebel brethren scrambled to find shelter in church basements, Dutro chose the five-star, 58-story hotel, with its lush rooms and 350-count Egyptian cotton sheets. He lives only a short taxi ride away in Carroll Gardens, Brooklyn.

“I knew everything was going to be a clusterf–k in the morning,” he told The Post, alluding to Occupy’s own disruption plans. “How would I get over the bridge when they were shutting it down?”

The tattoo artist-turned-Occupy money man took the elevator up to the fifth-floor welcome desk, where a disc jockey spins tunes and guests enjoy a vista of the growing freedom tower.

He said he spent $500 of his own money to get the room because he wanted a good night’s rest ahead of the cause’s two-month ceremony the next day and raucous post-raid protests.

“I knew . . . there was a high probability of getting arrested,” he said. “I wanted a nice room. That’s OK. Not everybody there is dirt poor.”

He paid for the palace with his American Express card.

“It is an expensive hotel. Whatever,” he said.

The rooms have 37-inch flat-screen TVs, window seats overlooking the city and iPod-dock alarm clocks. Visitors can order 12-year-old Glenlivet scotch for $375 a bottle, or an $18 pastrami sandwich, from room service. There’s even a menu for four-legged guests, including a $16 dog dish of Niman Ranch ground beef.

He claims he chose the W for its convenience, not its luxury.


If he can afford $500 a night hotel rooms he must be one hell of a tattoo artist.

(If I was an Occupier I’d ask for an audit.)


We don’t serve tea or Koolaid in here


riverdaughter, on November 19, 2011 at 9:05 pm said:

There is a certain segment of the Tea Party who I think will be very susceptible to the OWS movement. They’re the ones the DNC blew off for Obama. Right now, they’re the ones who hang out at places like the Crawdad Hole.
And as long as OWS stays away from politics, they have a good shot of winning them back.


I am a blue collar liberal. I’ve been one most of my life. But I am no longer a partisan.

Pick a policy issue and I lean towards the left. I am pro-choice and I support LGBT rights and single payer health care, I oppose the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. I support civil liberties and oppose the Patriot Act, domestic spying, torture and assassination. I support reasonable restrictions on gun ownership (like banning assault weapons) and want to see marijuana legalized and most other drugs decriminalized. I want to see the big banks and financial corporations broken up and regulated, our environment preserved and our social safety nets protected.

I believe that crony capitalism is one of the major problems facing our nation. In order to fight it I think we need genuine campaign finance reform that reigns in the power of money on politics. We also need tax and spending reforms that eliminate the ability of the government to reward campaign contributors.

Occupy Wall Street is an organization, not an ideology. “Occupying” is a tactic. I support neither one. But just because I don’t support OWS does not mean I support the bankers or that I am a Glenn Beck fan. (I swear that man lives rent-free in some people’s heads.)

For most of my adult life I was a partisan Democrat. While I lost faith in my political church a few years ago I still have my religion. Some people have trouble telling the two apart.

I can admire the strategy, tactics and dedication of the Tea Party members without supporting their goals. I can support the professed goals of some OWS members without supporting their strategy, tactics or unsavory associates. I can disagree with the ideology of conservatives without believing they are stupid and/or evil. More importantly, I can support their right to hold different opinions from me.

I don’t believe Barack Obama is a socialist. He is a conservative. As far as I am concerned the only difference between the Democrats and the Republicans in Washington is which way we are facing when they stab us.

Although I no longer consider myself a Democrat I am still registered as one and during the last general election I voted for Democrats in every partisan office except one, and in that one I wrote in the name of Ronald McDonald. I voted for Jerry Brown, Barbara Boxer, Gavin Newsom, and Kamala Harris. I did not vote for Dennis Cardoza.

I will not support or vote for Barack Obama. Nobama, no way. There is no candidate in either party that I support. It is my hope that the GOP will nominate someone I can hold my nose and vote for. Then we can start looking towards the 2016 Democratic primaries. If Obama is reelected we can’t start rebuilding until 2020.

During the past few months I have discussed the GOP presidential candidates without utilizing the filter of partisanship. I have discussed their qualifications, policies and character as well as the attacks being made against them.

I don’t agree with everyone who comments and posts at this blog. Most or all of the people here are former Democrats like myself. This is not a Tea Party blog, but Tea Partiers are welcome to drop by. So are Occupiers, Paultards, smelly hippies and wingnuts.

No trolls or Obots allowed.

This is supposed to be a place where people can agreeably disagree, but it’s not a hothouse for delicate flowers. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but anything you say can and will be mocked, jeered and/or disputed. But just because we ridicule what you say doesn’t mean we don’t like you.

If we have one common trait around here it’s cynicism with a big dose of stubbornness. We don’t believe in magical unity ponies or miracle cures. We’ve proven that we are pretty much immune to peer pressure too. We aren’t susceptible to anything but facts backed up with logic and reason.

If you want to change our minds you need to elevate your game above junior high name-calling and insults.

BTDTGTTSAWIO



Occupy Manifesto


Via Hot Air:

Goodbye life and freedom. License to kill is here. James Bond and Darth Vader is in your nabourhood.

The army and police and government will not care and think one second about shooting or killing babies or children. Army and police are only holding back the killings because they do not want the mess and the cleanup job. Secondly they believe a killingspree might make people revolt and in such a case the army and police will really have to start the killings and believe it is a little too early for the people to accept this. But in about 15 to 20 years from now it will be common to see the police and army kill at random. They will kill anyone and especially people revolting. They will kill and send in a special force cleaning team and kill anyone trying to collect evidence.

Police andarmy will arrest at will and if someone tries to revolt they will just drop a huge bomb in the area and blaim it on the people or person revolting and the survivers will now revolt against thir own people until everyone complies.

We are living in Orson Wells world and it is even worse. In 20 years time it will be so bad that your socalled freedom is a thing of the past. Every single movement you make will be controlled and if you do something out of the dictated you will be killed or perhaps just have all your resouces plugged out like debit-figures in the bank and your smartphone key will be blocked to get inside your work and essentially you will be on a nomans land mission and you will dies from starvation eventually.

Secret spies are in every street allready and the mission is called full control. Technology is used to control you from the invention of TV to the atom bomb and the next invention to be used is the smartphone. Next invention will be the chipimplant which will promiss a life of heavensand without it you are lost. GPS build in and every transaction tracked. James Bond tried all the technologies they could invent for him and today his operation is so much more easy.

Say no and reinvent the world as we know it.

Education. Education. Education.

It is probably too late and will take perhaps 50 years from now to turn the ship. It is worse a try but persnally I believe stupidity looses hence we are lost no matter how hard the 99% tries. 90% of the 99% are uneducated and illiterates so the battle is on for sure.

Let the games begin.


Can I get an amen?

Now if we can just figure out how to fit all that in the bat signal.


Finally! Occupy Congress


Next up: `Occupy Congress’

One of the enduring questions about Occupy Wall Street has been this: Can the energy unleashed by the movement be leveraged behind a concrete political agenda and push for change that will constitute a meaningful challenge to the inequality and excessive Wall Street influence highlighted by the protests?

A coalition of labor and progressive groups is about to unveil its answer to that question. Get ready for “Occupy Congress.”

The coalition — which includes unions like SEIU and CWA and groups like the Center for Community Change — is currently working on a plan to bus thousands of protesters from across the country to Washington, where they will congregate around the Capitol from December 5-9, SEIU president Mary Kay Henry tells me in an interview.


It’s about time. I’m sure they’re going to pressure Congress to enact strict new ethics laws to put an end to crony capitalism, and to launch an investigation into the financial meltdown.

One goal of the protests, Henry says, is to pressure Republicans to support Obama’s jobs creation proposals.

Wait, what?



Occupy Freeze Their Butts


JSOnline in Milwaukee:

Protesters who blocked traffic Thursday and invited arrest declared victory and marched off after Police Chief Edward Flynn said that officers wouldn’t help them fulfill their “martyrdom fantasies” and that they could stay “and freeze their butts off.”

Hundreds of protesters sat or stood on the North Ave. bridge over Interstate 43 for two hours.

Flynn, speaking to TV cameras as protesters chanted “We are the 99%,” said he was withdrawing most of the couple dozen officers who had been watching the protesters “so we can answer 911 calls and protect the community.”

The demonstration demanding economic justice coincided with others around the country on the two-month anniversary of the first Occupy Wall Street protests in New York.

Asked about the economic issues in the protest, Flynn told reporters, “If they’re angry about the economy, go to Wall Street. There’s 35% unemployment in this neighborhood. Who are they disrupting?”

Referring to below-freezing evening temperatures, Flynn said, “They can sit and freeze their butts off, I don’t care.”

[...]

For a while, it looked as if the protesters were going to stay on the bridge for the night, as five tents went up in the westbound lanes. Some protesters wore red arm bands to signify they were willing to be arrested in a case of civil disobedience, said Peter Rickman, a University of Wisconsin-Madison law student who was with the protesters.

But Flynn told the media, “We’re not going to fulfill the martyrdom fantasies of people who insist on being arrested while they disrupt the lives of this neighborhood.”


They just don’t make fascist oppressors like they used to.

Meanwhile:

For SEIU, Obama and Occupy

The Service Employees International Union, a political powerhouse on the Democratic side, made its early endorsement of Barack Obama yesterday; today, its president Mary Kay Henry is in New York for an Occupy demonstration on the Brooklyn Bridge.

With Obama and Democrats trying to benefit from the energy of the Occupy movement while keeping it at arm’s length, I asked her how those two things go together.

“There’s an economic emergency in this country and both things are required in order to turn this country around for working people,” Henry said. “The president has been fighting for American families by introducing the American Jobs Act. The Occupy Wall Street movement has made an incredible case to the country about this gross economic inequality. These two movements work together incredibly well.”


Whenever one of the Occupations needs to pump up their numbers for a march or rally, union members show up. Specifically the members of unions that are supporting Barack Obama.

No astroturf here, nope, nosiree.

Completely organic.

Here’s some old-fashioned police brutality:



Pride, Integrity and Guts


To hear Thom Hartmann (and others) tell it, we live in a police state. I must have missed the memo that says liberals and progressives are supposed to hate the police. I was raised to like and respect the police.

I despise bad cops, but I don’t hate cops in general. And I’ve had more than my share of bad experiences with the police. They once even kicked in my front door and hauled me off to jail (I was innocent and the case was dismissed).

I was watching the livestream reports the other night when the NYPD cleansed Zuccotti. People were standing right next to the police as they recorded events. Contrary to popular belief the police do not have to give the press free access to everything.

With a few notable exceptions the police in New York City, Oakland, Denver and other cities around the country have acted with professionalism and restrain in dealing with Occupiers. The police did not just rush in swinging billy clubs at peaceful demonstrators. The people that got arrested chose that option.

Here is one of the reasons I respect the police and the job they do:

Vallejo cop killed by suspected bank robber

A Vallejo police officer was shot and killed Thursday during a foot chase after a bank robbery suspect lost control of his car and ran into a backyard, authorities said.

The officer, James Capoot, a respected 19-year veteran of the Vallejo Police Department and the married father of three daughters, was driving alone in his cruiser just after 1:30 p.m. when he came across a fleeing silver SUV wanted in a robbery that had just occurred at the Bank of America at Springstowne Center on Springs Road.
Vehicle chase

Capoot chased the sport utility vehicle for 3 to 4 miles before using his cruiser to do a “pit maneuver” that forced the SUV to spin out of control on the 100 block of Janice Street, said Vallejo police Sgt. Jeff Bassett.

At least one suspect fled on foot, and Capoot got out of his car and ran after him as two other police officers were pulling up in their cars, Bassett said. Those two officers heard several gunshots and found Capoot wounded in a backyard, Bassett said.

Capoot, 45, of Vacaville was pronounced dead about an hour later at Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Vallejo, where colleagues gathered after the shooting.

“The officer did not discharge his weapon,” Bassett said.


Think about that the next time you see a protester screaming “Fuck the police.”


Reporters Without Borders Press Freedom Rankings


Mother of the Year Update


Remember Stacy Kessler?

Florida banker’s wife left family to join Wall Street protesters

A married mother of four from Florida ditched her family to become part of the raggedy mob in Zuccotti Park — keeping the park clean by day and keeping herself warm at night with the help of a young waiter from Brooklyn.

“I’m not planning on going home,” an unapologetic Stacey Hessler, 38, told The Post yesterday.

“I have no idea what the future holds, but I’m here indefinitely. Forever,” said Hessler, whose home in DeLand sits 911 miles from the tarp she’s been sleeping under.

Hessler — who ironically is married to a banker — arrived 12 days ago and planned to stay for a week, but changed her plans after cozying up to some like-minded radicals, including Rami Shamir, 30, a waiter at a French bistro in Cobble Hill, Brooklyn.

She swears she’s not romantically involved with her new friend.


She’s back in the news:

Runaway mom dreadlocked up

Here’s your mom, kids. Proud?

The hippie Florida mother of four who ditched her children and banker husband to sleep in Zuccotti Park’s squalor hit rock bottom yesterday when she was hauled off in handcuffs, her dreadlocks flying wildly in every direction, for blocking a street near the New York Stock Exchange.

Stacey Hessler, 38, was lifted off the pavement in the center of Broad Street by three cops who slapped plastic bracelets on her wrists and dragged her away kicking and screaming.

“What did I do? What did I do?” she kept shouting.

She was charged with resisting arrest and disorderly conduct after she blocked “vehicular and pedestrian traffic” and refused orders to move, cops said.


How do you make fun of something like that?



Mama Grizzly


Sarah Palin:

How Congress Occupied Wall Street
Politicians who arrive in Washington as men and women of modest means leave as millionaires. Why?

Mark Twain famously wrote, “There is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress.” Peter Schweizer’s new book, “Throw Them All Out,” reveals this permanent political class in all its arrogant glory. (Full disclosure: Mr. Schweizer is employed by my political action committee as a foreign-policy adviser.)

Mr. Schweizer answers the questions so many of us have asked. I addressed this in a speech in Iowa last Labor Day weekend. How do politicians who arrive in Washington, D.C. as men and women of modest means leave as millionaires? How do they miraculously accumulate wealth at a rate faster than the rest of us? How do politicians’ stock portfolios outperform even the best hedge-fund managers’? I answered the question in that speech: Politicians derive power from the authority of their office and their access to our tax dollars, and they use that power to enrich and shield themselves.

The money-making opportunities for politicians are myriad, and Mr. Schweizer details the most lucrative methods: accepting sweetheart gifts of IPO stock from companies seeking to influence legislation, practicing insider trading with nonpublic government information, earmarking projects that benefit personal real estate holdings, and even subtly extorting campaign donations through the threat of legislation unfavorable to an industry. The list goes on and on, and it’s sickening.

Astonishingly, none of this is technically illegal, at least not for Congress. Members of Congress exempt themselves from the laws they apply to the rest of us. That includes laws that protect whistleblowers (nothing prevents members of Congress from retaliating against staffers who shine light on corruption) and Freedom of Information Act requests (it’s easier to get classified documents from the CIA than from a congressional office).

The corruption isn’t confined to one political party or just a few bad apples. It’s an endemic problem encompassing leadership on both sides of the aisle. It’s an entire system of public servants feathering their own nests.

None of this surprises me. I’ve been fighting this type of corruption and cronyism my entire political career. For years Alaskans suspected that our lawmakers and state administrators were in the pockets of the big oil companies to the detriment of ordinary Alaskans. We knew we were being taken for a ride, but it took FBI wiretaps to finally capture lawmakers in the act of selling their votes. In the wake of politicos being carted off to prison, my administration enacted reforms based on transparency and accountability to prevent this from happening again.

We were successful because we had the righteous indignation of Alaskan citizens on our side. Our good ol’ boy political class in Juneau was definitely not with us. Business was good for them, so why would they want to end “business as usual”?

The moment you threaten to strip politicians of their legal graft, they’ll moan that they can’t govern effectively without it. Perhaps they’ll gravitate toward reform, but often their idea of reform is to limit the right of “We the people” to exercise our freedom of speech in the political process.

I’ve learned from local, state and national political experience that the only solution to entrenched corruption is sudden and relentless reform. Sudden because our permanent political class is adept at changing the subject to divert the public’s attention—and we can no longer afford to be indifferent to this system of graft when our country is going bankrupt. Reform must be relentless because fighting corruption is like a game of whack-a-mole. You knock it down in one area only to see it pop up in another.

What are the solutions? We need reform that provides real transparency. Congress should be subject to the Freedom of Information Act like everyone else. We need more detailed financial disclosure reports, and members should submit reports much more often than once a year. All stock transactions above $5,000 should be disclosed within five days.

We need equality under the law. From now on, laws that apply to the private sector must apply to Congress, including whistleblower, conflict-of-interest and insider-trading laws. Trading on nonpublic government information should be illegal both for those who pass on the information and those who trade on it. (This should close the loophole of the blind trusts that aren’t really blind because they’re managed by family members or friends.)

No more sweetheart land deals with campaign contributors. No gifts of IPO shares. No trading of stocks related to committee assignments. No earmarks where the congressman receives a direct benefit. No accepting campaign contributions while Congress is in session. No lobbyists as family members, and no transitioning into a lobbying career after leaving office. No more revolving door, ever.

This call for real reform must transcend political parties. The grass-roots movements of the right and the left should embrace this. The tea party’s mission has always been opposition to waste and crony capitalism, and the Occupy protesters must realize that Washington politicians have been “Occupying Wall Street” long before anyone pitched a tent in Zuccotti Park.


Rebuttal:

She has no problem hanging out with Glenn Beck like they’re BFFs.


Okay then.



Occupy TDS


Okay, it looks like Operation Shut Down Wall Street is just another Occupy Epic Fail. The Klown is disappointed. He stayed up all night hoping for some police brutality the revolution would destroy the bourgeoisie capitalists.

Check out this video from The Daily Show. Samantha Bee examines class divisions in Occupy Wall Street’s New York City encampment.

This is an open thread. The Klown will return after he sobers up gets some sleep.


Occupy Poll Diving


Occupy Wall Street Favor Fading

The Occupy Wall Street movement is not wearing well with voters across the country. Only 33% now say that they are supportive of its goals, compared to 45% who say they oppose them. That represents an 11 point shift in the wrong direction for the movement’s support compared to a month ago when 35% of voters said they supported it and 36% were opposed. Most notably independents have gone from supporting Occupy Wall Street’s goals 39/34, to opposing them 34/42.

Voters don’t care for the Tea Party either, with 42% saying they support its goals to 45% opposed. But asked whether they have a higher opinion of the Tea Party or Occupy Wall Street movement the Tea Party wins out 43-37, representing a flip from last month when Occupy Wall Street won out 40-37 on that question. Again the movement with independents is notable- from preferring Occupy Wall Street 43-34, to siding with the Tea Party 44-40.


OWS – 33%

Tea Party – 42%

That means the Tea Party is MORE popular than OWS.

But wait, there’s more!

Their sample certainly should have tilted this survey in favor of the Occupiers. Democrats comprise a ridiculous 41% of the sample, with Republicans slightly oversampled at 36% and independents far undersampled at 23%. In a sample weighted to the turnout model shown in 2010 exit polling, the Tea Party would actually lead OWS 44/35, and the generic Congressional ballot would be 46/42 for Republicans.


The Tea Party has a bad reputation. Wall Street is hated on Main Street. Yet somehow the Occupiers make them look good by comparison. Way to go guys!

Never argue with the Klown. The Klown is always right.



Image and Symbols


Occupy Wall Street’s Image Problem

Falling out of the public’s favor, the protesters should take a lesson from the civil rights movement and wrap their frustrations in the American flag

Occupy Wall Street is at a fork in the road. One path leads to political change, as the movement pushes the center of gravity in American politics to the left. The other path leads to irrelevance or even harm for the progressive project.

“Unless OWS understands the power of symbols, the American Autumn will be followed by a winter of discontent.”

For OWS, the latest opinion poll should be a wake up call. Early polls were favorable, but things have changed. Now only 30 percent of Americans have a positive view of the movement, and 39 percent have a negative view. It’s proving too easy for opponents to caricature OWS as a hodge-podge of extremists and oddballs — especially given reports of the violence in Oakland.

[...]

Meanwhile, the cautionary tale is the anti-Vietnam War movement. By the late 1960s, the Vietnam War was highly unpopular. But incredibly, the anti-war movement was even less popular than the war. The protesters were widely seen as un-American: rioters, desecrators of the flag, and advocates of amnesty, acid, and abortion. The protesters got a “reputation for being elitist, radical, and unpatriotic.”

The anti-Vietnam War movement never captured American hearts and minds. When protesters and police battled at the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago, a large majority of the public backed the police. One poll in 1968 asked people how they felt about the protesters on a scale of 1-100. Fully one third of the public gave the protesters a score of zero. And only one-in-six people put the protesters anywhere on the top half of the scale.

The protesters helped to elect Richard Nixon — not once, but twice. In 1968, the anti-war movement attacked the Democratic candidate Hubert Humphrey as an establishment hawk indistinguishable from Nixon, contributing to Humphrey’s narrow defeat. And in 1972, the movement was instrumental in nominating the ideologically pure but unelectable George McGovern.

To reach out to Middle America, Occupy Wall Street must present itself as part of the nation’s story: as a rebellion against the concentration of wealth in a new aristocracy. The movement should get churches engaged. It should get as many veterans as possible involved. And the simplest strategy of all: Occupy Wall Street should wrap itself in the American flag.

Compare photos of OWS rallies and Tea Party events. From a distance, you can’t always tell that the leftwing protests are in the United States. By contrast, the Tea Party is awash with the stars and stripes.

Overt patriotism can make people on the left feel a little nervous. But when the nation’s symbols have such meaning to so many people, why cede the flag to conservatives?

OWS should look to the Arab Spring for inspiration. Protest movements in the Middle East are extremely patriotic and flag-waving. The reformers claim to be the true Tunisians, Egyptians, and Libyans.

Unless OWS understands the power of symbols, the American Autumn will be followed by a winter of discontent. And the protesters can start by hanging a hundred flags at Zuccotti Park. One percent of the United States might not care about these symbols–but 99 percent do.


When I was a teenager getting ready to go out and look for my first job I was advised to get a haircut, put on a nice shirt, smile and say sir and ma’am. As the saying goes, “You only get one chance to make a good impression.”

Despite their pretentious claim to represent the “99%” the Occupiers are just a small fraction of the population.

The great thing about democracy is that you don’t need to reach a consensus to get anything done. All you need is 50% plus one. That’s called “majority rule.”

But in order to get to a majority you need to win people to your cause. This is where the left keeps fucking up.

I’ve never been to an Occupy rally. (I’ve never been to a Tea Party either.) But I’ve seen tons of pictures and videos, many of them prepared by the Occupiers themselves.

Their optics suck.

I’ve seen communist flags, anarchist flags, Che Guevara shirts, people that are heavily tattooed and wearing lots of metal in their faces, people wearing bandannas to conceal their faces, and lots of fringe lunatics.

Hey, it’s a free country and they can do what they want. They don’t bother me, I’m a DFH moonbat librul, I just don’t look like one. But some of my friends and relatives would fit right in.

The problem is lots of other people won’t react the same way I do. And before you get close enough to tell them anything they will have already closed their minds based on what they see.

Who the hell wants to follow people who look homeless? But worst of all is the conduct. The “people’s mic” comes across as creepy, and the yelling and rudeness when they disrupt events is a big turn-off. And some people in this country LIKE the police.

If I was secretly a whip-kissing fascist tea-bagger I would encourage the Occupiers to turn the knobs up to eleventy.

Seriously – go over to the wingnut blogs and read what they have been saying. They are hoping the Occupations continue until election day.



The Cleansing of Zuccotti


Just a few thoughts about Tuesday’s TRO Wankfest.

The OWS lawyers obtained an emergency ex-parte restraining order from a friendly judge who made a 6:30 am housecall to sign it. They say a good lawyer knows the law but a great lawyer knows the judge.

But even without a judge in your pocket ex-parte restraining orders are about as hard to get as a $20 Rolex in Times Square and last about as long. “Ex-parte” means “by one party” and refers to a judicial proceeding where only one side gets heard. Ex parte orders are generally intended to freeze the situation until everyone can come to court and be heard.

The OWS’ pet judge only made the order good for five hours until a hearing set for 11:30 am Tuesday morning. The protesters could waive all the copies they wanted but restraining orders are only binding when personally served. More importantly, by the time it was signed Zuccotti Park had already been cleared.

Ironically, the TRO probably delayed the protesters’ return to the park. The police had stated from the beginning that after the park was cleaned people could reenter. But they weren’t going to let anyone return with tents and camping gear, which is really what the dispute was about.

Here’s the court order:

The parties dispute whether the First Amendment applies to the actions of the owner in enacting the rules. For purposes of this application, the Court assumes that the First Amendment applies to the owner of Zuccotti Park, thus obviating petitioners’ request for a hearing as to whether Zuccotti Park is traditional public forum, or a limited public forum. Assuming arguendo, that the owner’s maintenance of the space must not violate the First Amendment, the owner has the right to adopt reasonable rules that permit it to maintain a clean, safe, publicly accessible space consonant with the responsibility it assumed to provide public access according to law.

The Court is mindful of movants’ First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and peaceable assembly. However, “[e]ven protected speech is not equally permissible in all places and at all times.” (Snyder v Phelps, 131 S Ct 1207, 1218 [2011], quoting Cornelius v NAACP Legal Defense
& Ed. Fund, Inc., 473 US 788, 799 [1985].) Here, movants have not demonstrated that the rules adopted by the owners of the property, concededly after the demonstrations began, are not reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions permitted under the First Amendment.

To the extent that City law prohibits the erection of structures, the use of gas or other combustible materials, and the accumulation of garbage and human waste in public places, enforcement of the law and the owner’s rules appears reasonable to permit the owner to maintain its space in a hygienic, safe, and lawful condition, and to prevent it from being liable by the City or others for violations of law, or in tort It also permits public access by those who live and work in the area who are the intended beneficiaries of this zoning bonus.


I’ve said for weeks that the City was on solid legal ground. Since Zuccotti Park is private property the First Amendment would not normally be implicated, and OWS had no right to possess or occupy the park on a permanent basis. But for reasons too complicated to explain here the park could be considered public property for the purposes of First Amendment analysis.

The court made the assumption it was a “public forum” and still ruled against OWS. That, IMNSHO, is the correct ruling.

Here’s what is so stupid about all this drama and histrionic claims of government oppression – no one has attempted to deny the Occupiers right to protest. Not in New York City, not in Oakland, not in any city.

Mayors Bloomberg and Quan both said that the protesters in their cities were welcome to protest on a daily basis, from early morning into the evening. The main conflict has been over 24/7 camping in city parks.

The protesters were told they were not allowed to camp overnight. They ignored the warnings. They were told to leave. They refused to go. Finally, the police moved in to evict them. They resisted.

So all this time was wasted fighting over camping instead of protesting their cause. Talk about rebels without a clue!

Meanwhile, for nearly two months now nobody has been talking about Barack Obama.

Mission accomplished!


Zuccotti Live-Blog III


The park is clean but empty, the protesters are roaming the streets hoping they will be able to re-enter. A court hearing is taking place this afternoon to decide if they can or not and under what conditions if they can.

Annoying Live Stream here.

Guardian Live Update here.

UPDATE:

Rule of law – 1

Occupiers – 0


Mob rule


Protesters hope to shut down New York’s Wall Street

Protesters hope to shut down Wall Street on Thursday — home to the New York Stock Exchange — by holding a street carnival to mark the two-month anniversary of their campaign against economic inequality.

Protest organizers acknowledged that the “day of action” could be the group’s most provocative yet, and could lead to mass arrests and further strain relations with city authorities.

“I think we’re certainly going into this with our eyes wide open, but (the march is) to provoke ideas and discussion, not to provoke any violent reactions,” said Occupy Wall Street spokesman Ed Needham.

“I think it is very difficult to do a day of action and not expect some sort of reaction from the (authorities),” he said.

The protesters plan to march to Wall Street from their camp headquarters in a park two blocks away and then spread out across the city’s subway system to tell the stories of disenfranchised Americans. They will reconvene later on Thursday for a march across the Brooklyn Bridge.

[...]

“We will shut down Wall Street,” a post on the movement’s Facebook page said. “We will ring the People’s Bell, and initiate a street carnival in which we rebuild and celebrate the neighborhoods that the Wall Street economy has destroyed.”

The group promises a “a block party the 1 percent will never forget.”

A spokesman for the stock exchange declined to comment.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, asked by reporters on Monday about the protesters’ plans, said: “The New York Stock exchange will open on time. People will be able to get to work, you can rest assured.”

[...]

At times the police presence has outnumbered the protesters and city officials have shown their patience is wearing thin with the encamped protest. But Thursday’s march could attract up to 10,000 people, protest spokesman Needham said.


Forget whether this is a good tactic or not. Don’t worry about whether it will be successful. Ignore the fact that 10,000 people isn’t even 1% of New York City.

What I want to know is what gives them the right?

Seriously – what legal, political or moral theory justifies taking it upon yourself to impose your will on others?

How is blockading Wall Street any different from blockading an abortion clinic or gay bar?

I keep asking this question and have yet to receive an answer.

More thoughts along this line from Arthur Silber:

If we restrict ourselves to instances of civil disobedience which are entirely non-violent (again, in common understanding), we can observe that those who engage in such civil disobedience decline to follow those courses of action which are expected and informally condoned or, in the case of more overt conflict, those courses of action which are legally required. In other words, they decline to obey; they are being disobedient. While that much is obvious (perhaps painfully so, you might be heard to say), the reversal that is attempted is perhaps not so obvious: those who engage in civil disobedience seek to make others obey them.

[...]

One of the results of the commonly accepted view of non-violence as devoid of compulsion, and thus tautologically devoid of violence, is that we are led to bewildering reactions, as reflected in a number of comments I’ve seen about recent events in Oakland, for example. Advocates of non-violence will enthusiastically applaud the fact that the port of Oakland was forced to be closed (those who operate the port did not choose to close the port voluntarily), while they fervently condemn those protesters who smashed some windows and caused other property damage (all of which seems to be comparatively minor, to judge from multiple reports).

Why is compulsion approved in one case, but condemned in the other? I am unable to identify a principle which justifies the disparity. (There may be one, but I have yet to find it, even though I have read and continue to read extensively on these issues.) The answer cannot be in the nature and degree of the harm inflicted. Consider the Milk Street Cafe example with which we began. The chain of events which led to the dismissal of more than 20 employees, and which may lead to the closing of the Cafe altogether, includes the presence of Occupy Wall Street. Rather than the continuing presence of the protesters, the Cafe’s owner himself might prefer, if he were free to choose, that the Occupiers broke some or even all of his windows, and perhaps went on to damage some of his other on-site property. If that happened on one occasion (and possibly even two or three times), he could replace and repair all of it, and his business might return to previous levels. That result would be a significant improvement over what is happening now.


Money quote:

I sometimes get the sense that certain advocates of non-violence are more enamored of their self-perceived moral superiority than concerned with identifying and analyzing the immensely difficult questions involved. But the contradictions in their views alone fatally undercut the moral righteousness with which they seek to smother those who disagree with them.


There is a word for people like that – authoritarians.



Occupy Godwin – Zuccotti Park Live-Blog

The Final Solution?

riverdaughter, on November 15, 2011 at 8:46 amsaid:

More and more I am beginning to believe that the words “clean”, “health” and “safety” have been tested.

That is extremely acute, and I’m sure you’re right.

It’s also exactly the same rhetoric that the Nazis used against the Jews.


Yes, because telling people they can’t camp-out in Manhattan is the same as putting them in death camps.

This is a live-blog on the situation in Zuccotti Park. I have stickied it to the top of the front page.

Newer posts can be found below this one.


Two years too late


Occupy Protesters Interrupt Chamber Of Commerce Health Care Event

Protesters disrupted a U.S. Chamber of Commerce event on health care today, interrupting speaker Scott Serota, the CEO of Blue Cross & Blue Shield. Chanting “we are the 99 percent,” the protesters stood at the luncheon event and used a “human microphone” technique to read a statement about how the “the one percent in the health care industry” is only interested in profit “at the expense of human suffering and preventable death.” The protesters decried the influence that the health insurance industry wielded in the debate over the Affordable Care Act, and called for “Medicare for all” or a “single payer health system.”


Wrong forum, wrong date. They should have been protesting in Washington a couple years ago.

Meanwhile:

Supreme Court to Hear Case Challenging Health Law

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a challenge to the 2010 health care overhaul law, President Obama’s signature legislative achievement. The development set the stage for oral arguments by March and a decision in late June, in the midst of the 2012 presidential campaign.


I’m not going to make any predictions on the outcome, but whichever way it goes will be bad for Obama.

If Obamacare is upheld, it will remind people about the most unpopular piece of legislation since . . . uh, . . . forever. Even Prohibition was popular when it first passed.

On the other hand, if it is struck down it will be a stinging defeat for Obama’s signature policy achievement.

That’s why Obamanation is praying that Mitt Romney is the GOP nominee.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 273 other followers