Image and Symbols


Occupy Wall Street’s Image Problem

Falling out of the public’s favor, the protesters should take a lesson from the civil rights movement and wrap their frustrations in the American flag

Occupy Wall Street is at a fork in the road. One path leads to political change, as the movement pushes the center of gravity in American politics to the left. The other path leads to irrelevance or even harm for the progressive project.

“Unless OWS understands the power of symbols, the American Autumn will be followed by a winter of discontent.”

For OWS, the latest opinion poll should be a wake up call. Early polls were favorable, but things have changed. Now only 30 percent of Americans have a positive view of the movement, and 39 percent have a negative view. It’s proving too easy for opponents to caricature OWS as a hodge-podge of extremists and oddballs — especially given reports of the violence in Oakland.

[...]

Meanwhile, the cautionary tale is the anti-Vietnam War movement. By the late 1960s, the Vietnam War was highly unpopular. But incredibly, the anti-war movement was even less popular than the war. The protesters were widely seen as un-American: rioters, desecrators of the flag, and advocates of amnesty, acid, and abortion. The protesters got a “reputation for being elitist, radical, and unpatriotic.”

The anti-Vietnam War movement never captured American hearts and minds. When protesters and police battled at the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago, a large majority of the public backed the police. One poll in 1968 asked people how they felt about the protesters on a scale of 1-100. Fully one third of the public gave the protesters a score of zero. And only one-in-six people put the protesters anywhere on the top half of the scale.

The protesters helped to elect Richard Nixon — not once, but twice. In 1968, the anti-war movement attacked the Democratic candidate Hubert Humphrey as an establishment hawk indistinguishable from Nixon, contributing to Humphrey’s narrow defeat. And in 1972, the movement was instrumental in nominating the ideologically pure but unelectable George McGovern.

To reach out to Middle America, Occupy Wall Street must present itself as part of the nation’s story: as a rebellion against the concentration of wealth in a new aristocracy. The movement should get churches engaged. It should get as many veterans as possible involved. And the simplest strategy of all: Occupy Wall Street should wrap itself in the American flag.

Compare photos of OWS rallies and Tea Party events. From a distance, you can’t always tell that the leftwing protests are in the United States. By contrast, the Tea Party is awash with the stars and stripes.

Overt patriotism can make people on the left feel a little nervous. But when the nation’s symbols have such meaning to so many people, why cede the flag to conservatives?

OWS should look to the Arab Spring for inspiration. Protest movements in the Middle East are extremely patriotic and flag-waving. The reformers claim to be the true Tunisians, Egyptians, and Libyans.

Unless OWS understands the power of symbols, the American Autumn will be followed by a winter of discontent. And the protesters can start by hanging a hundred flags at Zuccotti Park. One percent of the United States might not care about these symbols–but 99 percent do.


When I was a teenager getting ready to go out and look for my first job I was advised to get a haircut, put on a nice shirt, smile and say sir and ma’am. As the saying goes, “You only get one chance to make a good impression.”

Despite their pretentious claim to represent the “99%” the Occupiers are just a small fraction of the population.

The great thing about democracy is that you don’t need to reach a consensus to get anything done. All you need is 50% plus one. That’s called “majority rule.”

But in order to get to a majority you need to win people to your cause. This is where the left keeps fucking up.

I’ve never been to an Occupy rally. (I’ve never been to a Tea Party either.) But I’ve seen tons of pictures and videos, many of them prepared by the Occupiers themselves.

Their optics suck.

I’ve seen communist flags, anarchist flags, Che Guevara shirts, people that are heavily tattooed and wearing lots of metal in their faces, people wearing bandannas to conceal their faces, and lots of fringe lunatics.

Hey, it’s a free country and they can do what they want. They don’t bother me, I’m a DFH moonbat librul, I just don’t look like one. But some of my friends and relatives would fit right in.

The problem is lots of other people won’t react the same way I do. And before you get close enough to tell them anything they will have already closed their minds based on what they see.

Who the hell wants to follow people who look homeless? But worst of all is the conduct. The “people’s mic” comes across as creepy, and the yelling and rudeness when they disrupt events is a big turn-off. And some people in this country LIKE the police.

If I was secretly a whip-kissing fascist tea-bagger I would encourage the Occupiers to turn the knobs up to eleventy.

Seriously – go over to the wingnut blogs and read what they have been saying. They are hoping the Occupations continue until election day.



The Cleansing of Zuccotti


Just a few thoughts about Tuesday’s TRO Wankfest.

The OWS lawyers obtained an emergency ex-parte restraining order from a friendly judge who made a 6:30 am housecall to sign it. They say a good lawyer knows the law but a great lawyer knows the judge.

But even without a judge in your pocket ex-parte restraining orders are about as hard to get as a $20 Rolex in Times Square and last about as long. “Ex-parte” means “by one party” and refers to a judicial proceeding where only one side gets heard. Ex parte orders are generally intended to freeze the situation until everyone can come to court and be heard.

The OWS’ pet judge only made the order good for five hours until a hearing set for 11:30 am Tuesday morning. The protesters could waive all the copies they wanted but restraining orders are only binding when personally served. More importantly, by the time it was signed Zuccotti Park had already been cleared.

Ironically, the TRO probably delayed the protesters’ return to the park. The police had stated from the beginning that after the park was cleaned people could reenter. But they weren’t going to let anyone return with tents and camping gear, which is really what the dispute was about.

Here’s the court order:

The parties dispute whether the First Amendment applies to the actions of the owner in enacting the rules. For purposes of this application, the Court assumes that the First Amendment applies to the owner of Zuccotti Park, thus obviating petitioners’ request for a hearing as to whether Zuccotti Park is traditional public forum, or a limited public forum. Assuming arguendo, that the owner’s maintenance of the space must not violate the First Amendment, the owner has the right to adopt reasonable rules that permit it to maintain a clean, safe, publicly accessible space consonant with the responsibility it assumed to provide public access according to law.

The Court is mindful of movants’ First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and peaceable assembly. However, “[e]ven protected speech is not equally permissible in all places and at all times.” (Snyder v Phelps, 131 S Ct 1207, 1218 [2011], quoting Cornelius v NAACP Legal Defense
& Ed. Fund, Inc., 473 US 788, 799 [1985].) Here, movants have not demonstrated that the rules adopted by the owners of the property, concededly after the demonstrations began, are not reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions permitted under the First Amendment.

To the extent that City law prohibits the erection of structures, the use of gas or other combustible materials, and the accumulation of garbage and human waste in public places, enforcement of the law and the owner’s rules appears reasonable to permit the owner to maintain its space in a hygienic, safe, and lawful condition, and to prevent it from being liable by the City or others for violations of law, or in tort It also permits public access by those who live and work in the area who are the intended beneficiaries of this zoning bonus.


I’ve said for weeks that the City was on solid legal ground. Since Zuccotti Park is private property the First Amendment would not normally be implicated, and OWS had no right to possess or occupy the park on a permanent basis. But for reasons too complicated to explain here the park could be considered public property for the purposes of First Amendment analysis.

The court made the assumption it was a “public forum” and still ruled against OWS. That, IMNSHO, is the correct ruling.

Here’s what is so stupid about all this drama and histrionic claims of government oppression – no one has attempted to deny the Occupiers right to protest. Not in New York City, not in Oakland, not in any city.

Mayors Bloomberg and Quan both said that the protesters in their cities were welcome to protest on a daily basis, from early morning into the evening. The main conflict has been over 24/7 camping in city parks.

The protesters were told they were not allowed to camp overnight. They ignored the warnings. They were told to leave. They refused to go. Finally, the police moved in to evict them. They resisted.

So all this time was wasted fighting over camping instead of protesting their cause. Talk about rebels without a clue!

Meanwhile, for nearly two months now nobody has been talking about Barack Obama.

Mission accomplished!


Occupy Godwin – Zuccotti Park Live-Blog

The Final Solution?

riverdaughter, on November 15, 2011 at 8:46 amsaid:

More and more I am beginning to believe that the words “clean”, “health” and “safety” have been tested.

That is extremely acute, and I’m sure you’re right.

It’s also exactly the same rhetoric that the Nazis used against the Jews.


Yes, because telling people they can’t camp-out in Manhattan is the same as putting them in death camps.

This is a live-blog on the situation in Zuccotti Park. I have stickied it to the top of the front page.

Newer posts can be found below this one.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 272 other followers