Governor Who Took On Unions May Face a Closely Watched Recall Election
Thousands of volunteers have raced to collect signatures near busy intersections and malls all over Wisconsin, at makeshift “drive-through” operations in parking lots, during Green Bay Packers viewing parties and New Year’s Eve pub crawls, and even at a fold-up table inside Milwaukee’s airport just off Concourse C.
By a state deadline on Tuesday, these volunteers, many of them Democrats and union supporters, say they will submit at least 720,000 names on petitions to recall Gov. Scott Walker, the Republican who curtailed collective bargaining rights for public workers, leading to a face-off in this state.
Only two governors in the nation’s history have lost their jobs in recalls, but Mr. Walker himself acknowledges that, presuming there are no major flaws in the petitions, a recall election appears likely. That puts his removal, which would have a vote in late spring or early summer, within the realm of possibility.
Politicians and political operatives far beyond Wisconsin will be watching closely, not just for what the recall effort may imply for other states’ leaders who are considering cuts to workers’ benefits and union powers as a way to solve budget problems, but also as a sign for the presidential race. Wisconsin was one of several pivotal Midwestern states that gave Barack Obama solid victories in 2008 but then elected Republicans, including Mr. Walker, in significant numbers in 2010. Money from outside the state is certain to pour in from both sides for the recall vote.
In an interview in which Mr. Walker reflected on what he described as his “very surreal” first year in office, he spoke of the outside forces. “I think there’s a real sense that the government unions don’t want anybody — Republican or Democrat — doing this,” Mr. Walker said of his moves to limit benefits and bargaining rights for public workers. “And they’re going to try to make an example of me.”
When a state or local government has budget problems they basically have three options:
1. Cut spending
2. Raise taxes
3. Both
Borrowing is essentially option #2 but you spend the money now and collect it later. In many states this is not an option due to balanced budget amendments. Throw in other amendments like ones requiring 2/3 majorities and/or voter approval for tax hikes and your options are narrowed to option #1.
There is only so much “waste, fraud and abuse” to cut, and in economic downturns the cuts go beyond trimming fat and start carving meat. You can postpone spending on new infrastructure indefinitely but you can only delay maintenance and repair for so long and then bridges start collapsing.
So what did Scott Walker do that caused so much trouble?
Walker proposed a bill that would require additional contributions by state and local government workers to their health care plans and pensions, amounting to roughly an 8% decrease in the average government worker’s take home pay. The bill also would eliminate most collective bargaining rights for public employees except for wages. Public employees would be unable to seek pay increases above the rate of inflation unless approved by a voter referendum and the unions would have to win annual reauthorization votes and could no longer have dues automatically deducted from workers’ paychecks.
That’s it. No layoffs or pay cuts. Schools are still open.
Since the bill was passed into law the Wisconsin public employees have tried unsuccessfully to replace a crucial swing vote in the Wisconsin Supreme Court and spent millions on a recall election trying to remove six members of the state senate. They removed two senators but failed to gain enough seats to overturn the bill. Now they are seeking to remove Walker.
It would be a shame to see Walker recalled, he’s trying to help people keep their jobs, and an 8% decrease in benefits is better than no job at all.
Hmmmm, Feingold for Gov !? From Ann Althouse, last November:
http://althouse.blogspot.com/2011/11/prediction-russ-feingold-will-run.html
So Bank of America’s been working with the owners for 3 years? I thought banks were evil and kicked families out for no reason per the Owies?
Were the owners evicted? Why not help them first? I don’t trust the OWS version of this story.
OWS is pure evil.
With those kind of results you have to wonder if the bank called in OWS to get the homeowners out?
JSOnline:
This tends to be the pattern with unions. They have steady increases in power and compensation. Then the company gets into financial trouble. The union allows for give backs a few times and then draws the line. The employer then starts the massive layoffs.
Now, you can blame this on the corporations, especially if they have “record” profits, but here’s a better question. Many unions have rather substantial pension funds. Why don’t they just buy the companies their members work for and become the bosses themselves? Then they can figure out how to pay workers and pay the bills. I imagine they would end up like the pigs in Animal Farm.
Suddenly all those guys believe in gender equality.
O lordy, kids are watching MO on icarly. I may barf.
I may barf
It’s kind of funny, I mean I never thought it was possible for ICarly to get any worse.
Miley Cirus, Suite Life of Zack, and ICarly, ……hmmmm, how could we make them even more tortuous and annoying?? I know, let’s have a dance party with Michelle Obama!
I don’t think the unions claim to have a problem with the cuts. At least that’s my recollection through the fog of a football loss hangover. I think they only have a problem with the reduction in bargaining rights. So the fight makes sense from that point of view. Certainly it makes no sense from the cuts point of view because they’re probably spending more on the effort that the total of the cuts.
Here’s my view of this recall. Remember when the governor of California was recalled because of the energy prices skyrocketing in California. Later we learned it was all ENRON manipulating those prices and the gov. was helpless. How much money was spent on that recall and then the state was left with arnold swarchenegger. Elections cost alot of money and it seems the state of Wisconsin can ill afford another one right now. Why not wait until the next election cycle and then see how it plays out. Whats done is done and a new election will not necessarily change anything now. Or is it just revenge. I have friends there and they’re on that bandwagon. They are also big Obama supporters and hate Sara Palin. The thing is that they are 1 issue voters. All they care about are gay rights. They look at everything from that single issue and are suffering financially because of the job scene in the state but completely ignore the economic issues the state is facing. They don’t pay attention to any economic issues of the country. I’m reeling from watching the infrastructure economic stimulous money being spent on shovel-ready jobs here in Florida. Its all going into landscaping. Yea, thats shovel-ready alright. We’re spending thousands per palm tree to line the streets everywhere and put in irrigation for those palms. Its driving me crazy when I think of the money being spent here. I might add there is one other project with the money. Its for bus stops lit with solar panels. The solar panels light up the bus stops advertising billboards (created jobs to install) but guess what. There’s no overhang to keep people dry when its raining and at night, the solar panels are useless and the bus stops are dark. Somebody is stupid.