“Vote With Your Lady SMARTS, Not Your Lady Parts!”

This really needs to be made into an ad.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

59 Responses to “Vote With Your Lady SMARTS, Not Your Lady Parts!”

  1. myiq2xu says:

    The hate spew that MM gets from Vile Progs on Twitter is disgusting. I don’t ever want to be associated with people who say stuff like that.

    FTR – She is smart and pretty and she is always prepared. If you want to argue with her you better pack a lunch and hope she doesn’t eat it for you.

  2. HELENK says:

    very good advice.

    the democratic party has the silly idea that all women are only there lady parts.

    From what I can tell the republican party respects their lady smarts

    • jjmtacoma says:

      I don’t know how to put this nicely…

      I think the influencers in the party care only about “lady parts” (not women) and they seem to think we should be super happy about that and vote for any Democrat.

      • jjmtacoma says:

        By “not women”, I mean they don’t give two shits about women – just the parts that are fun.

        • myiq2xu says:

          Lots of those male Vile Progs are pro-choice because they don’t want to wear condoms.

        • Lots of those male Vile Progs are pro-choice because they don’t want to wear condoms.

          That’s too specific and easily argued with. Just say the whole truth: Vile progs want to fuck with impunity. That covers every scenario, and both genders.

  3. swanspirit says:

    There are many pro choice republicans . The head of the Republican party here on the shore is a pro choice republican woman . I hate it when the leftist who say they worship at the altar of diversity , admit none for the Republican party, and they do it all the time .Pleny of lady smarts out there , and here 🙂

  4. carol haka says:

    MM is brilliant and I think she has photographic memory. I still wonder if some vile creep stole her niece to get back at her. 👿

  5. ♥ That slogan. Fantastic.

  6. myiq2xu says:

    Obama Campaign Co-Chair Eva Longoria Gets Schooled

    By Michelle Malkin

    Because if you’re a Democrat it’s not sexist.

    (Or racist)

  7. angienc says:

    OT — Two things that are pissing me off with the chattering classes: (1) The argument over whether Crowley was “right or wrong” in saying Obama did call Benghazi a “terrorist attack” on day 1 because that leads down a rabbit hole of semantics (of course, the corrupt & stupid Obots love that because it takes away from the real issue) and (2) That Romney “missed an opportunity” at the debate when all that happened — it just shows why Mitt has made millions in private equity and the rest of us haven’t.

    First, it doesn’t matter if Crowley was right or (as she admitted after the debate) wrong — it is not the role of the moderator to “fact check” — she didn’t fact check Obama’s claims about drilling grants on federal lands for example. Focusing on her accuracy misses the point. It was for the American people to decide whether Romney or Obama had the story straight as to how the White House handled relating the Benghazi attack to us.

    Second, watch the tape of that moment in the debate again — Romney didn’t “miss an opportunity” here — after Crowley, at Obama’s behest, inappropriately changed from moderator to fact checker, Romney continued on his point about Rice going on the Sunday shows, but Obama continued to desperately interrupt, telling Crowley that “he’d be happy to discuss foreign policy” but it was time to move on so they could get to other questions from these “wonderful folks” and Crowley agreed and called on the next person to ask a question. Romney walked back to his chair making the tactical decision to not continue on with his point given that he was now debating both Crowley & Obama (and could potentially alienate the “wonderful folks” by not allowing the person whose name Crowley called to ask his question) in light of the fact that the 3rd debate, on foreign policy, was coming up & he could revisit the issue then, especially now that Obama had committed to the “I called it a terrorist attack on day 1” story. It’s called choosing your battles. The chattering class, so thrilled that Obama appeared semi-awake & foaming at the mouth to declare Obama the “victor” missed this in deciding that “this is where Obama ‘won’ the debate” — but, as the polls show, the rest of us rubes didn’t.

    • DM says:

      The way I look at it, the loser of the debate is Crowley because she’ll never get an opportunity to moderate again.

    • swanspirit says:

      Some of the people are stupid all of the time , some are not , 🙂 The amount of disinformation out there is only surpassed by the amount of people willing to be lied to, and not do there own checking , which in this time of a few clicks to the truth , is inexcusable ,

      But I am upset , I am in a FB convo with a friend of my sons that I have known since they were teens , and he just informed me that Israel was a non issue to him because …

      ” You want to know why Israel is a non-issue to me? Here’s you’re answer. Sheldon Adelson. Manufactured issues from a country that itself practices terrorism. Frankly, I support us not being involved with Israel because it makes us more of a target for attacks like the one in Libya. You can’t have a War on Terror while supporting a terrorist state or practicing it yourself. ”

      And this is a person that I considered reasonably intelligent . I do not want to discuss this further with him, and I am pretty certain my son doesn’t realize he thinks like this , or has swallowed this garbage whole from leftist memes .

  8. DM says:

    Go Giants!

  9. BTW—-did anyone else see this in their paper today?

    Fox is having an hour long special tonight at 10 EDT on the Benghazi/Libya situation. It is an expose of the real truth and what the White House is hiding. The interesting thing about this is that there was a FULL PAGE ad in the first section of today’s Columbus Dispatch all about this show…….trying to win Ohio votes for Romney and to detach people from Obama!!

  10. carol haka says:

    Seriouly can’t even fathom what kind of emergency treatment I will need if this election does not go the right way and end on November 6th! 👿

    • DM says:

      I enjoy reading about politics, but I think it should not be taken too seriously. The U.S. has had bad presidents before. I think President Wilson was a terrible president. The Sedition Act of 1918 was very fascist, but in the end it was repealed in 1920. History is on the side of the good guys. If Obama is reelected, we’ll be fine.

  11. OldCoastie says:

    Myiq- watching the game. Giants are playing awfully good ball!

  12. DM says:

    Sweet home run

  13. carol haka says:

    If the murders in Libya put the final nail in the Obama Administration’s coffin, then those brave men will not have died in vain! 👿 they are truly heroes!

  14. HELENK says:

    Has anyone read anything about what charlotte lamb did while she was watching the attack in real time?? did she notify anyone, did she try to get them help, or did she sit there with her thumb up her ass.

    From what I am seeing the people in benghazi were the ones who notified the embassy in tripoli.
    Could there have been help sent in from the carriers in the area, a rapid response team sent??

    • DM says:

      The State Department has issued a detail report on what happened in Benghazi.

      • HELENK says:

        that is testimony about what was happening on the ground in Benghazi and who they called for help.
        Charlotte Lamb testified she watched it in real time in DC. who did she notifiy, were any calls for help from the carriers in the area?

        Why i ask is as part of my job I was usually the first one notified of an incident. It was my job to start notifications and get people on the way to the scene. Wasn’t that part of her job?

        • swanspirit says:

          We cannot seem to get an answer to that question , can we?

        • DM says:

          I’ve not read what was done from DC, only that Hillary was monitoring the situation. I assume that she informed Obama:

          CBS News correspondent Margaret Brennan reports. In a hearing earlier this week on Capitol Hill, Charlene R. Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary for diplomatic security, testified that Clinton was monitoring the attack electronically.

        • DM says:

          and there’s this other piece of info:

          “She’s not that interested in focusing on herself, but — but, you know, obviously she was here very late that night,” said Nuland, adding that Clinton was receiving regular updates from officials. “She was making phone calls to senior people, and so she was obviously very much involved, but I think she was not interested in sort of giving a personal tick-tock. It’s not the way she operates.”

    • DM says:

      As those guys attempt to secure a perimeter around Building C, they also move to the TOC, where one agent has been manning the phone. I neglected to mention from the top that that agent from the top of this incident, or the very beginning of this incident, has been on the phone. He had called the quick reaction security team, he had called the Libyan authorities, he had called the Embassy in Tripoli, and he had called Washington. He had them all going to ask for help. And he remained in the TOC.

  15. tommy says:

    Nancy Pelosi is circulating stats of her fundraising efforts for House Democrats thereby indicating that she plans to continue as minority leader.

  16. DM says:

    Great pitching, great plays, go Giants.

    • DandyTiger says:

      Hmm, big Democratic business guy, who would know all about the auto industry and real value of the auto bailouts. That could be interesting. Wonder if Lee will be in some ads.

  17. Constance says:

    That Fox special on the terrorist attacks in Libya was well done. I hope it is on line and also shown over and over again until the election is over The thing is I have seen a lot of dead people having worked in health care and the pictures I saw of our ambassador being carried or dragged through the streets, he didn’t look dead to me.

    • angienc says:

      Yes, it was well done especially as it didn’t draw conclusions — it left the unanswered questions unanswered. But I’m super pissed off right now that the MSM is not giving this story the scrutiny itself, it is *helping* cover up the story.

  18. Constance says:

    I also want to know is the guy who made the film that the Obots blamed this incident on still in jail? Since it was clear from the start it was a terrorist attack, why did they ever arrest him? Sure he had parole violations but there are murders and rapists running around with parole violations and the Feds don’t give a rats ass. Also CNN had an interview with the guy in Libya who is supposed to have been responsible for the terrorist attack. He is just walking around living life, not in jail, not interviewed by the USA or Libya. Yet somehow CNN found him and talked to him.

    • angienc says:

      Yes, he’s still in jail. He was arrested as a scape goat so Obama could go to the UN & say “the future must not belong to those who insult the ‘prophet’ of Islam” and pretend the attack wasn’t the result of his idiotic policies.

      • Constance says:

        Where is the media on that?! The guy has a first amendment right to make whatever movie he wants. Where is the Christian community for this guy, you would think they would inquire about what the plan is for him ? The Obots just locked this guy up and forgot him and so did the media, probably because they are a bunch of liberals so they think the first amendment only applies to pornography.

  19. myiq2xu says:


    It’s over a week and one-half until Halloween and I’m almost out of candy already.

Comments are closed.