Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue Goes to 7 Continents, Finds Exotic People to Use as Props
For the 2013 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue, the magazine photographed models on all 7 continents. A world tour of ill-fitting “swim” wear! But sometimes a half-naked lady standing in front of a gorgeous natural backdrop just isn’t enough. So the photographers used natives as props.
Using people of color as background or extras is a popular fashion trope, whether it’s Nylon magazine, the Free People catalog, British Vogue or J. Crew. But although it’s prevalent, it’s very distasteful.
A photo shoot in Spain included matadors. Cliché but not that problematic: Matadors are performers themselves, in a way. (Spain, and by extension, the rest of Europe, was also represented by these carriage drivers.)
However. One photograph shot in Guangxi, China, included a group of young girls. The model, Jessica Gomes, is Australian, but her father is from Portugal and her mother is from Singapore. Since she’s part Asian, it could be argued that this shot is not about what Gwen Sharp at Sociological Images calls the centrality of whiteness. Yet the model, in Western clothes (however skimpy that suit may be), is placed in the center as a contrast to the children in non-Western clothes. It renders them “exotic,” a spectacle. In addition, the model is not interacting with the kids. Classic case of othering. Also: People are not props.
Are you shocked? I know I am.
For several decades now SI has run an annual “Swimsuit” issue (under the theory that the art of bikini stuffing is a sport) and every year someone gets their panties in a bunch.
They gather a few impossibly thin and beautiful women with abnormally large breasts and “clothe” them in swimsuits containing less material than a typical pair of socks. Then they take a bunch of pictures, airbrush out the imperfections and voila!
Once upon a time it was pretty racy stuff. But compared to what is widely available online these days it’s pretty tame. I’m not sure why the bother with traveling to exotic locales and posing people in the background. Nobody cares about that stuff anyway. Well, almost nobody.
(Ironically a lot of the men involved in producing these picture are gay.)
I’m not saying that men ogling women is a good thing, but isn’t there more important stuff to worry about?
Generally speaking, healthy men want to make fun sexy time with women. (Gay men want to make fun sexy time with other men.) The human sex drive is very strong, especially at the time of young adulthood. That’s Mother Nature’s way of ensuring the survival of the species.
Sexual repression leads to bizarre behavior. On the other hand women are not property or playthings. While we can’t change human nature we can and should expect men to control their base urges.
As for the “othering” of exotic peoples, isn’t that exactly what National Geographic does? Some people really need to get a grip.
Every year there is a big stink over the swimsuit edition. Makes me wonder if the sales would go down if there wasn’t so much hype.
ooops. Did I let the cat out of the bag?
On another note- I thought that asteroid thingie was not going to hit? So what is this that exploded over Russia? A random rock they did not see?
>blockquote>CHELYABINSK, Russia (Reuters) – More than 500 people were injured when a meteorite shot across the sky and exploded over central Russia on Friday, sending fireballs crashing to Earth, shattering windows and damaging buildings.
You hear that? It’s the sound of Mayans getting the last laugh. 😉
LOL! Sorry I fubar’d the blockquote. Not enough coffee
“Might be the asteroid” ? The article wasn’t sure, don’t they know where these things are? With 500 people hurt by “fireballs”, sounded like a big one, oh my !
LOL A Meteor landing in DC would not hurt my feelings at all.
I’m sick of all the grievance-mongering, and finding offense behind every rock. Ya know that Mencken quote?
Puritanism: the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, is having a good time.
Thats the progs anymore. They’re like fucking societal clerics, roaming the streets with a Holy Diversity Checklist, ready to scold and cane transgressors who so much as think an impure thought.
I’m tired of it. Fuck ’em.
Had to share this:
Husband is having dental work done, watching the overhead TV.
Story comes on about Sports Illustrated 7 Continents shoot.
Dentist says, “WOW look at those penguins!”
That SI controversy is such a fake. It is just a way to make news. Here is my gripe. Is Valentines day national tit and ass day or something? I don’t care that there is a SI tit and ass issue for men but could us hetero women get something to dream on too? Maybe a review of Mr Darcy’s over the last 50 years for the faint of heart and perhaps a Channing Tatum and co stars review or something for the more adventurous women. Why isn’t there a bunch of teams coming up with some such visual yearly feature for women media consumers? The whole idea that these SI women are somehow leaders among women that we are all supposed to greet with awe is just 20th century bullshit.
Constance, I was stuck in the Denver airport 8 hours waiting for a connection and wandered into the news stand, where I noticed a magazine rack labeled, “Mens Interest”. The top two shelves were all skin mags like Playboy and Penthouse. I wondered if there was a rack labeled, “Womens Interest”, looked around and found there was indeed. The magazines on the top two shelves all had titles containing some form of these two words: “bride” and “wedding”.
A lot of women read romance novels. Maybe there’s a market for romance magazines? Romance graphic novels?
Do you ever read Playgirl magazine? Is it still around or did it go, ahem, bust?