Worst President Ever!

george-bush-miss-me-yet


Obot heads are gonna be asplodin’ now:

Bush More Popular Than Obama

In a Gallup tracking poll released Tuesday, former-President George W. Bush currently stands with a favorability rating of 49%, compared to 46% who see the 43rd president unfavorably. Meanwhile, another Gallup poll shows President Obama with only a 47% approval rating, with 44% disapproving.


As someone who spent eight long, miserable years despising George W. Bush, let me say in all sincerity:

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Advertisements

About Myiq2xu™

Peaceful coexistence or mutually assured destruction. Your choice.
This entry was posted in Worst President Ever! and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

68 Responses to Worst President Ever!

  1. myiq2xu says:

    Way back in 2008 I predicted that Obama would be Bush III and would ruin the Democratic brand.

  2. myiq2xu says:

    At least Bush was usually honest. He did what he said he would do. Obama said he would be the anti-Bush and instead he’s Bush w/steroids.

    • votermom says:

      This is why I watch South Korean tv dramas instead.

    • wmcb says:

      But it is instructive that Sorkin forever sees his side as eternally Righteous and yet eternally Victimized by the forces of the non-righteous.

      Great piece. And true. And disturbing. Does the right in this country have its sickos, self-justifiers, and loonies? Yep. But the left in this country is filthy with this self-justifying, I-am-the-underdog-even-as-I-oppress-the-fuck-out-of-you mindset. Filthy. With. It. It’s endemic anymore.

      • wmcb says:

        This is why in a country that has a black president, a black DOJ, black SCOTUS Justice, and entire cities that are almost exclusively run by black office-holders, I am often told by lefties that the black man has no power. The statement is asinine on its face. They don’t just say racism still exists (it does), they claim that black people have NO power. None. And they are fucking sincere when they say it. That is how deep this psychosis of I Must Be The Righteous Savior of the Poor Victims goes.

    • elliesmom says:

      Does Sorkin know any real Republicans?

    • fif says:

      I tried to watch that show and the sanctimonious tone and self-righteous propaganda made my skin crawl. They just love to love themselves as world saviors – that’s why Obama is their guy – as long as it doesn’t cost them anything significant in terms of their own comfort and pleasure. I don’t see them out working on soup lines or skipping their posh vacations because of their outrage over inequity. Their hypocrisy and lack of honest self-awareness knows no bounds. The ultimate irony: they are just like the extremists on the right they loathe – thinking they know what is best for everyone else if we would just STFU and let them run the world.

  3. angienc says:

    Once again Romney proven right — about 47% support Obama NO MATTER WHAT and there was absolutely nothing he (Romney) could have done to win them over and get their votes.

    Hey — I wonder if phone records and emails of Romney campaign staff and the RNC would have been something OFA would have been interested in seeing during the campaign — nah, NSA would *never* have allowed something like that, right? /eye roll

    Lets see, we’ve got the IRS, DOJ, EPA, HHS and NSA — makes the FEC a pretty sure bet. But no one in DC or the MSM will ever, ever connect the glaringly obvious dots to what I knew happened just based on crowds, messaging etc of Romney v. Obama on election day when the “results” came in. (Yep, I’m still beating that dead horse because it is as plain as the nose on your face).

    • lyn says:

      Honk! The crowds at the Romney rallies proved he was winning, and no one can convince me that Obama won re-election fair and square.

    • DandyTiger says:

      Of course they cheated. The real question is, who was behind the cheating? Was it just the Dems? Notice the Repubs did the same for Bush. Is it just when the more establishment members of either party feel like the selected candidate is worth pulling out all the stops? Or is there some players above the party fray doing something? Or just random happenstance of who cheats best? Wouldn’t it be neat if we had a curious press?

  4. swanspirit says:

    “Now I will tell you the answer to my question. It is this. The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. We are different from the oligarchies of the past in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just around the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know what no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now you begin to understand me.”
    ― George Orwell, 1984

  5. votermom says:

    • myiq2xu says:

      I caught a bit of ABC News last night while I was fixing dinner. Diane Sawyer was saying the NSA has something like 300,000 employees. I don’t know if that includes contractors.

      That’s a lot of cyber spies.

      • wmcb says:

        The massive recent growth of both the manpower and the budget of our country’s spying agencies give the lie to both “It’s all about the terrorists.” and “We rarely ever look at what we’ve gathered.”

        Sorry, but if the millions of phone records they got are all connected to a terror plot somehow, the whole country is one big terrorist cell.

        • wmcb says:

        • wmcb says:

        • Lulu says:

          Other is political operatives.

        • wmcb says:

          OK, I asked hubby, who had a Top Secret clearance for all of his military career. He says they have to stamp certain people with TS clearance for tiny little specific things. I don’t explain it as well as he did, but here’s the gist of it.

          For instance, if he as a doc ordered specific unusual immunizations from a medical supplier, that supplier had to get clearance, even if they were not a registered contractor. Because the info about what ships were ordering what drugs/immunizations could, if analyzed, tell an enemy where those sailors were headed next. The govt cannot tell the supplier “shut yer mouth on pain of imprisonment” unless they first saddle him with a TS clearance. Then every so often the military goes through the list and weeds out old clearances, some of which may have been only used once or twice, for a very narrow purpose.

          Same with some specific maintenance on some installations. If the item/machinery in question is Top Secret, then the tech guy who gets helicoptered in to put 2 oz of some weird specialized oil in for lubrication has to get a clearance – even if he pretty much sees/knows nothing other than the specific task he is doing.

        • wmcb says:

          Yeah, he’s saying that the military and govt use lots of little odd one-off suppliers for this or that, who don’t have an official “contract”, but have to enter a room where there is top secret stuff, or have access to TS equipment, or whatever, to do what they were hired to do. So they get a clearance not so much to allow them to see more stuff (because they honestly don’t see that much), but to give a legal reason to tell them they have to shut up about it.

        • Lulu says:

          Stephanie Cutter.

  6. myiq2xu says:

    Alex Twit blames BOOSH!!!

  7. wmcb says:

    Listen to this entire speech by Cruz on immigration. He talks about how the bill was basically written by the unions, and has hundreds of waivers in it where the Executive branch can just unilaterally change whatever they want.

    • wmcb says:

      Seriously, watch this. I know its long. EVERY Democrat on the committee voted against increasing legal immigration, against tons of very common sense issues. They also LIED on the welfare eligible thing.

      That info needs to get out. This whole charade was nothing but a grandstand to trap the R’s into voting against immigration reform.

  8. What’s WordPress’s position?

  9. wmcb says:

    The old guard are just pitiful. And they are flat out terrified of the libertarian wing of the GOP taking off. This bit of concern trolling actually made me laugh.

  10. wmcb says:

  11. gxm17 says:

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Amen and a hallelujah chorus! The schadenfreude is delicious, indeed.

  12. yttik says:

    LOL, that is pretty darn funny! Obama polling below Bush. Hey, he’s earned it. Obama has taken everything to the next level. Bush never actually authorized himself to execute US citizens without due process.

  13. HELENK says:

    http://weaselzippers.us/2013/06/11/gop-senator-nsa-spying-on-americans-phone-records-goes-deeper-than-weve-been-told-analysts-looking-at-numbers-with-no-connection-to-terrorism/

    graham must be getting worried about his re election. says NSA goes deeper than we have been told.

    backing off the hey I am fine with government spying on citizens

Comments are closed.