The Definition Of Insanity

npcaal3


This year just keeps getting better and better.

Pelosi: Dems don’t want ‘new direction’

House minority leader Nancy Pelosi downplayed problems with the Democratic Party, saying that the party’s values “unify us.”

“I don’t think that people want a new direction,” Pelosi said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday. “Our values are supporting working families. What we want is a better connection of our message to working families.”

Pelosi’s appearance came a few days after she was re-elected by Democrats to serve another term as House minority leader, beating back a challenge from Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Ohio.

Host John Dickerson said that Democrats have been clobbered at every level since 2008, which Pelosi attributed to natural reactions to the party that holds the White House.


Albert Einstein said, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”

But the real problem for the Democrats is their current fight for control is between the far-left and the really loony-left. Back in 1988 they were blown-out with the super liberal Dukakis. That’s when the more moderate wing of the Democrat party (led by Bill Clinton and the DLC) began to move the party back to the center.

The Democrats don’t have a moderate wing any more. Remember the Blue Dogs? Thanks to Obama, Pelosi and Reid they have been purged from the party.


The Democrats are flying high!

The Democrats are flying high!


Advertisements

About Myiq2xu™

“Let’s be honest, the people who are currently outraged are the same people who have always been outraged.”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

60 Responses to The Definition Of Insanity

  1. votermom says:

    I don’t know why, but sometimes my internet will just hang and I have to unclick wifi and reconnect.

  2. elliesmom says:

    The beatings will continue until morale approves.

  3. votermom says:

  4. lateblum says:

    “I don’t think that people want a new direction,” Pelosi said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

    What Pelosi meant is that Democrats who survived in Congress don’t want change because Nancy raised more money for them in the last 8 years than in the history of fundraising. Why cut off their $$ if they can get more?

  5. AFVet says:

    This one is making the rounds out there.
    MAGA!

  6. elliesmom says:

    So I watched Jill Stein’s rude rant from the link on the last post. At one point she said there were as many as 70,000 blank votes from Detroit, and that could change the results. Even if it’s true, how could it change the results of the election? If the voting machine was at fault, how could anyone at this point determine who the voter meant to vote for? The votes would still have to be discarded. Stein is largely a vanity candidate so she must have someone behind her, and while the motive is pretty obvious, what does the puppet master expect the final resolution to be?

    • lateblum says:

      Obama wasn’t on the ballot in Michigan in 2008 primary yet the DNC gave him HRC votes saying they “would have gone to Obama” if his name had been on the ballot.
      HRC has already been stung by ballots being given to a person whose name wasn’t actually on the ballot. It has to be her or Soros backing this tactic.

    • If a ballot is blank on the POTUS choices I would assume the voter chose not to vote for any of the candidates.

      • kanaughty says:

        Yes, and there seemed to be enough people on twitter at least who would state they couldn’t vote for any of them so would leave it blank. I guess this is a good lesson that if you have write in in Your state and you don’t want to vote for any major party candidates or have vote tallyers fill it in for you, to make sure to write in so any party counting votes don’t have a chance to steal your vote for their candidate.

        • kanaughty says:

          Write in fricking bigfoot if you have to, but write in something so dems or repubs can’t claim you meant to vote for them since you voted dem or repub down ballot.

    • Mt.Laurel says:

      People can cast votes in which they chose not to vote. That is why categories that let you vote for no more than three never add to the total number of voters times three because some people vote for none (blank), some one, some two, some three. You cannot go back and fill in blank votes. I know several people who said they did not vote top of the ticket this year. Once again, GW and Laura said this is exactly what they did. Agree or disagree you do not have to pick one of the above.

    • elliesmom says:

      I understand people can leave a blank vote, but Jill Stein is suggesting people voted for someone, and the voting machine erased the vote. My question is even if they dissected a voting machine and discovered it was “rigged”, how far would a court go to assign the votes to one candidate or the other? A primary belongs to the political party, but a general election is subject to laws. Would the votes get “assigned” or discounted? If the ballot is discounted because it’s declared fraudulent, what happens to the people who got the votes down ballot? Would the election, at least in that state, be invalidated? I know there’s no way to separate out illegal votes because there’s no way to tell which votes were cast by illegal immigrants, dead people, or “overly enthusiastic” voters. Once the person is allowed to vote, it counts. That’s the point behind the “provisional ballot”. To keep it isolated until the voter’s credentials can be validated.

      If Jill Stein was credible about her motives, she’d be pushing for random hand counts of counties after every election not just places where the voting results displease her. I suspect Stein is getting “Nadered” and has chosen places where the left has decided she “cost” Hillary the election. But her motives aside, what do the people sending her money hope to accomplish? Is it just making Trump’s win appear to be less legitimate, or do they really believe it’s going to give the election to Hillary?

    • XFR says:

      Stein claimed during the general that she thought Trump was the lesser evil compared to Clinton. Go figure…

  7. mothy67 says:

    Said this on last thread– the dims are losing the gays.
    Women here are not Triggkypuff. Normal gays are sickened by gay cakes. I am a lot more than who I want to sleep with.
    My icons are Tina Turner and Dolly. They be Hennessey rich but aging with grace. Has there ever been anything as pathetic as Madonna offering blow jobs. So beneath everything. Gross. What mother of a young daughter was not repulsed. Milo thrived. Nobody who has cable in the last 400 years is shocked by gaydom. Its actually become boring. Its impossible to think Trump is a homophobe. He delights in being larger than life. He explodes upon life but its tongue firmly implanted in cheek. I think he won the election when he said Rosie. She fooled the world with her talk show. Soon after she dropped her mask. People were appalled I waited on her many times. She is rough around the edges but never rude. My only problem with her is she would go into the kitchen to be on her cell phone. I was pseudo managing Joe Allen. One of the busiest restaurants in the world. It was simply not safe for her to be standing in the kitchen on her phone. Stuff flew by. She did it many times. I yelled at her. Few days later she’d do it again when you go to Europe and everyone tells you about load brash Americans they are tlking about Rosie.m

  8. 1539days says:

    Einstein didn’t write it and there’s no evidence that he said it. The phrase was not written down anywhere until the 1980’s. People mis-attribute it, over and over again.

    Sorry, but this is from someone who had a poster of Einstein on their dorm wall.

  9. mothy67 says:

    cannot verify but my friend that worked at The Haugue says there are many people that want to hold soros accountable. Out for blood. I always thought soros stuff was crazy but it seems he really is behind social upheaval across the globe. He has millions that hate him.

  10. Venus says:

  11. AFVet says:

    Due to the incessant levity of this blog, I find it necessary to share this with you.
    This blog is similar to the Onion but with a military bent.
    For anyone who has served the country or for those who haven’t, take a look.
    The stories are hilarious.

    http://www.duffelblog.com/

  12. votermom says:

  13. votermom says:

    LOL

    4 down, 1 to go!

    • CiscoKid says:

      Well done!
      20 January 2017 can’t come soon enough.
      Then it’s 🍾🍾🍾 time.

      • Lulu says:

        And Bronco just gave a big fancy state dinner for Italian guy! That helped him a lot. NOT.

        • kanaughty says:

          Any time he campaigns for anyone else, they lose!!! Hahahaha. He is like kryptonite to his own party and peers who believe in this fascist progressiveness. So i say he should go ahead and campaign for merkel😉😂😂😂

        • kanaughty says:

          With how things are going, i only see trudeau lasting one term too.

    • lateblum says:

      HRC already made the front page of Newsweek and they had to recall the edition with egg on their collective faces. Why would Time bother to put her on its cover – the person who lost TWICE?

  14. Lulu says:

    Another example of insanity is in Oakland. http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Tenants-describe-conditions-inside-site-of-deadly-10691108.php The media is trying mightily to change the subject from a bunch of crazy scammers who are very dangerous and who got away literally with murder into a high rent, housing shortage. All cites have high rent and complaints from the people living there. But on one of the SFGate dot com stories about the inferno at a rave in the comments were a few architects, structural and construction engineers from the area discussing BRIBERY in Oakland with public officials both elected and civil service. They were talking about being hassled OR having to pay off inspectors, city officials, etc to get structures built or rehabbed. When I went back to save the link those comments had been wiped in less than an hour.

    If this is true or not in Oakland, it would certainly help explain why the city would show up over and over due to complaints of gross safety violations and then just drop it each time. The prosecutor’s office is also looking for answers on why a notorious and often reported fire trap, a guy with repeated legal trouble, utility theft, the safety of his own children, minors attending his advertised drug/music parties for a DECADE could just skip out on the enforcement of laws by the city and none of the city bureaucracy or elected officials has an answer or reason (they will admit anyway) nor is angry about it. It also makes me wonder why sanctuary cities, who are in legal jeopardy for non-compliance of federal law are getting a little something under the table from groups who profit from illegalsl instead of all their faux moral preening. Hillary, Obama, Soros, etc have shown that criminals are going to do whatever if the price is right. Follow the money.

  15. Dora says:

  16. votermom says:

  17. Dora says:

    Not much of a future for this party, I’d say.

Comments are closed.