Yesterday some drunken/drugged old hag was seen rambling semi-incoherently:
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on Monday questioned “the point” of having scheduled deportations and immigration raids. Her statement was a clear reference to the massive operation that was scheduled to take place in 10 cities on Sunday but was put on hold at the last minute.
Pelosi told a group of people in New York that President Donald Trump’s raids were “appalling,” TheBlaze reported.
“When I saw that the president was going to have these raids—I mean it was so appalling; it’s outside the circle of civilized human behavior to just be kicking down doors, splitting up families, and the rest of that, in addition to the injustices that are happening at the border,” Pelosi said. “We have legislation to go forward to address those needs, but in terms of interior enforcement, what’s the – what’s the point?”
According to Pelosi “a violation of status is not a reason for deportation.”
Is she serious?
This woman is running the House of Representatives. She’s the third in line to take control of our country, should things go really, really south. And she doesn’t understand that breaking an immigration law is reason for deportation?
It’s really not that complex or hard to understand. We have immigration laws. Our immigration laws say people who want to live and reside in the United States need permission to come to our nation. They need to fill out paperwork, pay a fee, go through the interview process and prove themselves worthy of becoming American citizens. We have a right to know who is coming to our country and why. We have a vested interest in who decides to come here. It’s a matter of national security.
We are in the middle of an illegal immigration crisis. Millions of foreigners are currently living in this country illegally. Bizarrely, Democrats tried to claim there was no immigration crisis earlier this year when Trump declared that illegal immigration was a national emergency.
Trump campaigned on the issue of illegal immigration. His promise to build a wall was repeated at every campaign rally. The Democrats were shocked by Trump winning and shocked again when he tried to keep his promise. They have opposed anything and everything Trump has tried to fix the problem. But their opposition to immigration reform predates Trump taking office. For at least 20 years the Democrats have been declaring that the cities they control are sanctuaries for illegal aliens.
Democrats claim they are opposed to open borders. So what do they want? Assuming we can get them to admit there is a crisis on our southern border, what solution(s) do they propose?
Democrats oppose building a wall. They have made it clear that they will not agree to a single penny to build a wall. They claim it would be a waste of money and it would not work. While it is true that a wall would not be a panacea for all our immigration problems, wasting money on things that don’t work has never bothered Democrats before.
Democrats oppose all forms of prevention. To hear them tell it, everyone on the planet has a right to come to America. When Trump tried to temporarily ban people from certain countries, the Democrats flew to Hawaii to get a friendly judge to issue a nationwide injunction. Democrats had a hissy fit when Trump ordered the military to go help the Border Patrol.
Democrats oppose holding children in detention with their parents while their asylum claims are adjudicated. But they object to separating families too. And they object to deporting any immigrants, including those convicted of crimes.
Last but not least, the Democrats object to anyone disagreeing with them. If you object to millions of poor, illiterate Central Americans flooding into our communities, you are a racist.
The Democrats object to Trump stopping immigrants from coming here or sending back the ones already here. Is there anything the Democrats will agree to?
Sure. The Democrats will agree to amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens who are already here. They will agree to a path to citizenship as long as that path is short and unobstructed. And they will agree to Trump resigning.