
What are ya going to do? Democrats are just batshit crazy.
A few thoughts on this impeachment theater effort by long-simmering Democrats. First of all, the idea of the President being impeached today based on a phone call with another head of state is unprecedented. Furthermore, to have a CIA spy at the White House make the whistleblower report on information he’s not even privileged to know of is pretty close to treason—outright treason. The intelligence apparatus in this country has a real motive problem here since the President has campaigned on draining the swamp, and now they’ve assigned spies to conduct covert operations inside the WH? And Nancy thinks the Ukraine phone call is easy for the public to understand? Huzzah! I’ll take those odds.
That said, in hindsight, I wonder if Trump should have released the full phone call script. A summary would have been better, if not a straight out fight. The release of the script set a precedent, and a bad one. Democrats will make additional demands for other phone call scripts, you can bank on it. Fighting them will take a colossal effort and great expense. But that’s not why, in hindsight, Trump should have thought twice. It’s because now this will color every phone call he has with heads of state in the future. How could it not? There are already reports that point to this. It will take time to rebuild that trust. Probably until he is reelected, which, if this is all they have, he will be.
Now this is clearly either a Hail Mary pass or orchestrated theater (your pick, or both). Pursuing impeachment based on this transcript of the phone call, the opposition will be hard pressed to make the case with proof. The whole thing hinges on how to prove you can read the President’s mind and discern his intentions. That’s it. Of course, that is their favorite party game, so they are at least practiced at it.
To my mind, this looks like a defensive play. Trump has everything going for him in terms of reelection, especially this robust economy. None of the Democratic accusations have hit, and the electorate is clearly moving in his direction. Dems have a plate of unsavory candidates on offer themselves this year. This is the Dems attempt to agitate their traditional factions in order to protect their demographic silos. They need all of their people, even those that only occasionally tune in, to have a sound wall between them and the real state of affairs in this country. This impeachment noise is that wall.
They will make a show of this, definitely. This is the part that has happened before. Two presidents have been impeached: Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, both Democrats. Both failed to be prosecuted convicted* in the Senate. A House impeachment action is always a circus affair.
Now many believe that Bill Clinton’s impeachment was unnecessary, and many believe it was. I had a nuanced take on it, and it hasn’t changed much despite a transition in my political thinking. I can hold these thoughts simultaneously: 1) The sexual abuse suffered by some women who have powerful bosses is wrong and should not happen. 2) This impeachment effort wasn’t about that and wasn’t worth it. These were not “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
But what about Andrew Johnson? Well that was distinctly different. It doesn’t even matter what the charges were there, as it was the composition of the elected bodies and the unique circumstances of the time that drove that effort.
One of the many tactics Lincoln used to get reelected in 1864 while the country was engaged in the Civil War was to create a uniparty ticket. It was actually called The National Union Party. And it consisted of himself, a republican, and Andrew Johnson, a democrat. Johnson was born a southern son (NC), and later migrated to Tennessee where he began to accumulate his political power. He thus represented the willingness of some southern sons even as he represented the increasing power of the West to broker a peace between the traditional colonies.
Then Lincoln got assassinated a year later, and a HEAVILY Republican (75.9%) Congress was stuck with Lincoln’s f*cking Democrat as president. Not only did they have massive voting block power, they were very put out after the assassination of the President who guided them through the Civil War and very recently to victory. This impeachment was a power flex due to political imbalance and war, something the founding fathers had hoped to avoid. Everywhere in the FF’s world are processes to encourage compromise and share power. That doesn’t happen when there is lopsided political power. War agitates everyone.
In both cases the House made it a sordid public affair, relying as in so many of our civil courts on the feels of the story, instead of the standard of proof. But, at the end of the day, even with heavy margins in the Senate, there were some circumspect Senators in both cases who just really didn’t think the Senate ought to go there. It wasn’t even close for Bill Clinton, and Johnson survived for the lack of one vote.
So I expect this will go like that. It might be over by January, or they could drag it out until next summer or fall. But it will fail in the Senate. Design of the game. Two-thirds majority required. Democrats do not have the numbers to win there, and Republicans will likely be unified in defiance, even though they don’t have to be.
They could lose 8 without sweating, more if some Democrats defect, which they will. I don’t expect anything other than unified defiance from the GOP, minus Romney of course. These are the Dem senators that I think have to be worried about supporting impeachment because they are up for reelection in red or Trump states: Doug Jones (AL-1st), Tom Udall (NM), Gary Peters (MI-1st), Tina Smith (MN-1st). I’ve identified those who are up for their first reelection. Of course, Joe Manchin (WV) is always in play, though he’s not up for reelection, so that decreases the heat for him.
Now I expected it to go this route because it has become obvious to me lately that the GOP might not mind an impeachment effort and could use it as a unifying strategy with voters. Maybe galvanizing is a better word than unifying. Not necessarily actively pursuing it, but like, bring it when you’ve got brass knuckles in your jacketed hand. The benefit is to force the left into a rabid, hyper-partisan eeeeeend of the woooorld as weeeee know it tone and hyperreaction. Everybody will get sick of it outside rigid leftist ideological enclaves. This is not Iraq compounded by a declining economy and the exploitation of Katrina. They have no hook here. This is about a left that has been throwing a hissy fit since November 8, 2016 because they are such sore losers.

This is what irrelevance looks like.
Keep all this in mind as Democrats execute Operation Batshit Crazy Exgirlfriend. They are going to be flinging as much poo as possible and hoping one of their monkeys turns out to be Shakespeare. (Fat chance at that.) But there is nothing they can do about the dynamics in the Senate. They know they are checked, and this impeachment effort is going nowhere. And they know they have to throw a lot of shade and drama just to give the appearance in 2020 that they are holding their own. I’d say don’t stress about it too much. Us wasting our time freaking out about every little thing is a byproduct of this effort known as gas-lighting. I’m not letting them do that to me. I’m going to keep living my best life. Irrelevance is the best revenge.
*Klown edit
Jesse nailed it 😀
He’s naive if he thinks the truth always prevails.
Here is his full show.
shared
Yes, the whole clip was wonderful.
jesse was ok ————it drives me crazy with Kellyann that he interrupts her—— jesus let her finish I did notice he didn t do it with anyone else————overall it was good
Well, here ya go. 😉
You mean like trying to sideline Tom Brady?
LOL, I’ve seen a lot of sports analogies to our current politics. Only political junkies usually “get them” 😀 There’s a very fine line between sports and politics, but politics is the only sport fans can participate in. I love that PTrump is our Quarterback 😀
“Politics is the only sport for grown-ups.” – Robert A. Heinlein
Impeachment is racist. If Democrats destroy Trump’s economy, minorities will be hurt.
Back when the Raiders were the winningest team in the NFL (1965-85) they were also the most penalized. Then they started losing all the time and they were still the most penalized.
Heh. Steve Howe of “Yes!” won “Guitarist of the Year” so many consecutive years that they promoted him to Rock Legend or some such and didn’t include him in the competition after that. 🙂
I like the sound of “Donald Trump Presidential Legend”.
How is this allowed to continue if the House didn’t up/down the Impeachment inquiry ? The Dems seem to be making up rules as they go along.
fuck her.
She is a walking corpse.
She sure is starting to look like it!
Democrats will still be talking about impeaching Trump in December 2024.
“We’re running out of time! If we don’t do it now we’ll never do it!”
It’s the only idea they have.
testing
The Klown fixed your name Friday night.
thank you for putting up with me——gotta catch up——talk soon
Just start commenting and replying ! 😀
Welcome, Michelina!! Looking forward to your comments!!
What fresh hell is this ? They also sell commie t-shirts at this site.
https://www.boycottmaga.com/
Doesn’t work. Amateur effort.
It’s a handy reference for places to shop.
Pingback: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup » Pirate's Cove
“Mitch McConnell could be key…” ?? Well, he better be. The Dems are flailing all over the place to destroy PTrump before he destroys them. The “inquiry” is nothing more than MORE obstruct and resist. Then took a 2 week vacay. This is getting exhausting, lol. Anyhoo, this article pretty much explains the impeachment process…..
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/09/29/mitch-mcconnell-could-be-key-to-derail-impeachment-train-831938
shared
The silence from the GOP is deafening. They are no help.
I know! Levin said because Nanzi broke the rules, the Senate doesn’t have to take anything that the House does on impeachment.
The House changed the rules. This will not be like previous impeachments. The time for the minority to have raised a stink was when the D’s took over and changed the rules after midterms
“…..Nancy IS AOC…..”
Nobody knows the Constitution like Levin. A must watch.
❤
I was just going to post that. Mark Levin is great!
It’s hard to believe he started out as a ‘Never Trumper’.
He was a strong supporter of Ted Cruz. During the primary he said he would not vote for Trump in the General should he become the nominee, because he was not a conservative. However, unlike the other NeverTrumpers, once Trump won the nomination, Levin announced he would support and vote for him in the General.
Levin has a brain.
I listened to him for years. Never heard anyone who knows the founding documents like he does. He is passionate and sometimes really loses it when talking about the insane left (mostly on his radio show, don’t see it on the tv show). The Obama years really made him crazy, lol.
If you don’t “lose it” occasionally you’re not paying attention to what is happening.
There’s a lot of 2016 Never Trumpers who came around. Had Trump not entered the 2016 race, I would have been on the Cruz Train too. But life comes at you fast, only a Trump could have trumped the Hillary that year. He had nothing to lose 🙂
I was for Cruz until Trump showed up and started talking about immigration. Be still my heart, no one else had the guts to bring it up but him. Many Americans didn’t have a clue as to what was going on until he told them.
My original list was:
1. Walker
2. Cruz
3. Perry
I started of as a NeverJeb. I told people if someone held a gun to my head and told me to pick Jeb or Hillary I would tell them to pull the trigger. Trump was nowhere on my list because I didn’t consider him a serious candidate. Somewhere around the Megyn Kelly debate I changed my mind about Trump. Scott Adams had a lot to do with that.
Looks like my early list too. NeverJeb !
WOW! Amazing.
caught up I will do as commanded VB
Commanded?
its a joke no harm meant . I have a weird sense of humor
I m new here commenting——— you are my teachers meant in a good way
Ok, just start replying and commenting, it’s all good 🙂
It takes quite a bit to qualify as “weird” around here.
Another good one to read.
https://amgreatness.com/2019/09/28/on-impeachment-the-democrats-are-all-talk-and-no-action/
Unfortunately for the Democrats, however, their brand of amateur political theater has long since worn thin. The American people are increasingly apt to view all politicians as self-interested and dishonest, including Democrats. Will a plurality of Americans support the impeachment of Donald Trump, therefore? Most assuredly. But a comparable number would probably also support the impeachment of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) or Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) if such a thing were possible—which is merely a reflection of how polarized and embittered voters have become.
Sixty-six percent of Americans are against impeachment. That’s why the liars are scrambling to blast their bullshit everywhere.
… with the hopes of creating more Americans who have caca for brains.
And they have the microphone. The question is can they persuade Americans that Trump is guilty. Because they are good at giving half truths or completely ignoring facts that don’t fit the narrative. It is said that a majority of people still get their news from MSM. If that is all they hear and read, then that 66 percent is likely to change. The big unknown, will the Americans fall for the bs?
https://www.newsmax.com/tawfikhamid/morsi-egypt-mubarak-muslim/2019/09/24/id/934059/
some good questions
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/28/virgil-lessons-of-impeachment-from-watergate-to-monicagate-to-bidengate/
this is a must read. stick together or hang separately
shared
https://freebeacon.com/national-security/u-s-seeks-prisoner-swap-with-iran/
Iran prisoner swap
you want to see your sick friend, then let my people go
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/democrats-want-to-impeach-a-republican-president-what-else-is-new/
I don’t think they like republicans. WOW who knew!!!!!!!!
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/09/25/graham_confident_there_is_no_quid_pro_quo_141343.html#2
so the Pentagon used proper judgement on the Ukraine arms, but the dems say Trump with held them. Does anyone in congress have a clue?
This is scary, they are so busy running around like headless chickens working against a sitting president they do not know what is really going on.
You assume they give a shit. Their only purpose is to oust Trump. They could care less what reality is.
Exactly.
Yep, I’m seeing a pattern 😉 And it reminds me everyday why I jumped off the Dem Wagon of Hell.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/it-will-be-ugly-rolling-thunder-chief-predicts-if-democrats-impeach-trump-bikers-will-descend-on-dc/
dems may get the civil war they want
Rolling Thunder should do a DC drive by now. “Prelude to impeachment of our elected President”
She’s got that ‘I’m running’ sound in her voice.
She looks like she has a really bad cold in that still.
You should see the video of that still.
Who wants this tired-ass pizda for president?
Well. There’s a new word for my vocabulary.
I like it too. Thanks Lyn!
Pizda is Russian for the C-word. I think we have discovered who the Russian operative in our midst is. All this time I figured it was VM.
Dah
Well, that’s the pot calling the kettle crooked…
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/09/at_least_130_state_dept_officials_notified_of_possible_culpability_in_security_incidents_related_to_hillarys_private_email_server.html
she might be running but it won’t be for president. what country would give her asylum? Russia, Iran?
China.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/09/violence_against_the_citizenry_is_the_lefts_intent.html
this is scary because by today’s dems actions it could be true
That’s why they’re so anti 2nd Amendment. Those who would violate the Rights of others prefer them to be defenseless.
Don’t be defenseless.
Ain’t I 2nd Amendment 😉
I do not how to make the video show but it is worth watching
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6090394653001/?playlist_id=938973798001#sp=show-clips
so brennen put a CIA operative in the WH, when did it change that the CIA could investigate on American soil? The FBI could but not the CIA.
I remember reading about a time when CIA had to have a meeting on an Indian reservation because it was not US soil
I want Joe Biden to explain all this stuff. And I want him to do it under oath, on camera, and with at least one trustworthy Republican asking the questions.
Devin Nunes would be merciless
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/opinion/article235403347.html
interesting. are we willing to put up with Trump’s unorthodox behavior?
He has gotten more done in 2 years than the last 3 presidents ever did.
what did we want and what did we get?
you decide
Mark is on a roll!
I thoroughly enjoyed mark Levin on the f & f video————kind of support we need
can’t believe at one time I loved that woman (hillary) she makes me ill
Many former Hillary supporters here, we understand totally 🙂 The 2008 primary especially, she had every right to fight Obama all the way to the convention floor, then leave without endorsing him, but she rolled over and threw us all under the bus. Dems have gone down hill ever since. Hillary too.
I was always an independent. I vote for people I like not party. they were both disgusting with sarah palin———–and I am one who never forgets
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/how-gop-will-answer-pelosis-pre-planned-lawfare-assisted-impeachment-plan
let them fire all their arrows and then you fire the cannons?
DC MARCH
https://trumpmarch.com/
thanks helen would love to go. I understand Washington is lovely in october
should be fun
March for Trump Oct 17th
If I didn’t have to fly across the country, I would go,.
They talk about busses on that website. Curious about the one picking me up here in HI 😂
i’ll be lookimg into going
http://www.bookwormroom.com/2019/09/28/bookworm-beat-9-28-19-ukraine-climate-change-illustrated-edition/#more-63726
some really great posters funny but true
YES YES YES YES
https://scontent-mia3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/71091065_431003997525705_6293827964408692736_n.jpg?_nc_cat=109&_nc_eui2=AeH_CtuidUB_mIJkWYEsqo6XnVs42MaB2eQdU6pKz6ZOTIEXZ344c64ZCvgepXFLWoTSHxXnkIaIP-kocwOFTCy7n0MgRgPhdZlgdJDpqiKnDw&_nc_oc=AQnpiQu8i6vLYqb-8Gk0c25oXiBq9ZekGJP8p-Q7yAUOZaKzYPl_sd0zjx_TB8U4temEd4gUgoUgjT1jbGudEEQF&_nc_ht=scontent-mia3-2.xx&oh=73ccfe63b9ebc5d44441a421aea8e730&oe=5DF6067C
“The president used that opportunity to try to coerce that leader to manufacture dirt on his opponent and interfere in our election,” Schiff told chief anchor George Stephanopoulos, referring to Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy. “I can’t imagine a series of facts more damning than that.”
So, investigating a specific instance of possible corruption is “manufacturing dirt”?
OK, then. The Mueller “investigation” was really just “manufacturing dirt” on the President.
Any investigation of the President is now, “manufacturing dirt”.
But Hilda’s paying for the dossier is nothing, right? They have gone off the cliff.
Edit:
. . . Any investigation of the President is now, “manufacturing dirt”. I can’t imagine a series of facts more damning than that.
Harris is a racist cunt.
Racist pizda.
😀 I was trying to find Anthony’s one.
Skanky nasty ho.
https://www.gulftoday.ae/news/2019/09/29/trump-putin-telephone–calls-in-democrats-sights
THEN EVERY PHONE CALL BACKTRACK EVER MADE TO A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE MADE PUBLIC.
wth if we never have any trust between a US government and a foreign government again so be it
bring on the carrier pigeons
Think she will accept? (sarc)
Teen CJ Pearson challenged Climate Girl to a debate about climate and stuff. I think Candace Owens has upped her debate challenge to 100k to AOC’s favorite charity…..crickets on both accounts.
I took the liberty of making a minor edit to Lola’s post. Both Johnson and Clinton were prosecuted in the Senate but neither was convicted.
Muh man, John Edwards saved Clinton’s sorry ass that’s why. 😉
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/02/12/senate.statements/edwards.html
Thanks for the edit, MyIQ
I’m kinda a Nazi about legal terms. I was also wondering the other day what would happen if the House passed articles of impeachment and the Senate simply ignored them (which would be a failure to prosecute.)
I probably was thinking “failed to successfully prosecute” and just missed it on review.
To your second point, that would provoke SCOTUS involvement, another check. The most they could do is force the Senate into a perfunctory show trial. This is going nowhere by all game scenarios.
The best of the Democratic candidates.
Larry David does a better Bernie Sanders than Bernie Sanders does. And Maya Rudolf nailed Kamala. I loved the “fun aunt” bit.
That little Corn Pop was me.
That was funny stuff. Wait, what? LOL.
So I look at the clock and realize I have to go get Mom from church. I jump up (slowly) and run (slowly) out to the car. I’m driving away from the house and I’m wondering why the world looks so blurry when I realize I’m still wearing my reading glasses.
Heh. After oversleeping on a work day and still groggy, I was accelerating down my 25 yard long driveway, pushed in the clutch to shift my sporty car into second gear, and then realized, “Oh, wait . . . there’s no second gear in reverse!”
I finally had that senior moment looking for my readers and they were on my head. 😉
I once spent 5 minutes looking for the sunglasses that were dangling from my mouth. I found them when Mom asked “What are you looking for” and I had to take the earpiece out of my mouth to answer.
So how was the new dispensary?
I got a good feeling from it.
NeverTrumper comes around and has some very good insights.
https://noqreport.com/2019/09/29/conservatives-must-galvanize-existential-threat-socialism/
An analysis of the Trump Ukraine call by a constitutional lawyer:
1. It is unquestioned that Biden, as a sitting VP, took his son Hunter (apparently on gov’t transport) to first Ukraine and then China or that, after each visit, Hunter Biden gained significant economic advantages (as in managing a $1.5B fund in the latter case). Hunter Biden has zero experience in East Europe or China, and no experience in either company’s type of opertions. He was a board member, and board members do not necessarily have either of these, but Biden as a lawyer was really only useful to them (from a professional knowledge point of view) WRT US operations and laws pertaining thereto.
2. [Joe Biden] Using government office to gain economic advantage for family members [Hunter Biden] is at least arguably and I assert positively is corrupt under existing statutes.
3. The President is head of the Executive, which carries exclusive power to conduct foreign relations. No other branch of government has this power. (Do not confuse the Senate’s Advise and Consent responsibility for the conduct of foreign affairs – the Senate must advise and consent to completed treaties but has zero role in negotiating those treaties, at least as a matter of law.)
4. The President as Chief Executive is chief law enforcement officer of the USA. As such, he is empowered – I would argue obligated – to investigate corruption, especially at high levels of government.
5. Item #1 constitutes probable cause for an investigation of Biden for corruption.
6. As Executive, the President is the ONLY official authorized to request foreign assistance in a corruption investigation (he may delegate this power).
7. Obtaining foreign cooperation in investigations of corruption by a US official is a matter of statecraft/diplomacy, ie, a function of foreign affairs. No (or very few) rules apply. The President has the sole power here.
8. CONCLUSION: Trump not only is entirely within his powers to use foreign aid as a means to persuade Zelensky to investigate the Biden affair, I believe he was obligated to do so (qv #4).
https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/constitutional-law-attorneys-analysis-of-the-trump-zelensky-phonecall
My inner legal Nazi demands I correct #5 – it constitutes reasonable suspicion to investigate. Probable cause is the evidence threshold for arrests and searches. There is insufficient evidence to arrest Joe Biden at this point, but plenty of reason to investigate his activities.
If this is true, it’s frightening.
If banning the AR-15 would end the gun control issue for all time I would agree to it, not because I think it’s right but because it would be a reasonable compromise. Someone could still challenge the constitutionality of the law though.
But it would not end anything. If we gave them the AR-15 the Democrats would come back the very next day with some other guns to ban.
They’ve been moving the goal posts for, what? a hundred years?
Used to be that an American could buy any weapon he wished. Fully functional Civil War cannons used to sit out in people’s front yards.
But the slow, steady encroachments on the 2A has made most civilians utterly defenseless in public. Simultaneously, there has been an engendering of hoplophobia in the populace to such an extent that, for instance, school teachers would literally rather die shielding students with their bodies than use a firearm to defend them.
“Dem voters” so that doesn’t surprise me, and “poll conducted by The Hill”, yawn. How about we try taking guns away from criminals first ?
If I may.
I’m not frightened at all.
The ones that should be frightened and extremely cautious are those that actually try to…
MOLON LABE.
🇺🇸MMXX🇺🇸
States are starting to ban 80% lowers which aren’t considered firearms by the ATF. I bought a multi-pack on sale a few weeks ago.
Fun film on Netflix.
Ok, will watch tonight because I love the scenery, lol. Last night I watched In Search of Fellini.
I liked the Agatha Christie movie too–Agatha and the Truth of Murder. It’s a fictional account of her actual disappearance for 11 days. It happened after her husband wanted a divorce and marry his 24-year-old lover.
Scalise!!!
I’m surprised Chuck let him talk.
Chuck couldn’t think of anything to say. He seemed to be sort of growling.
Hillary’s mini-me is jumping into the fray. So the gloves are off, right? We can smash her in the cyber face now? This is just not a good look for her, little bitch……
Sock it to her, VM!
Take away her wealth privilege and she would be a welfare mom living in a single-wide outside Little Rock with 4 kids from 3 different men.
Bazinga !
Oh, give me a break!
Does it show them pissing in Trevi fountain and raping teenagers in the alleys?
Judging by the comments, people aren’t happy. According to the article, it won’t be permanent. We shall see.
Say what Joe?
He said son of a bitch.
Yes. Yes he did.
Well, well, well. Biden flinches.
To ban Rudy? Scratch a dem and you always come up with a fascist. So is that going to be his MOA if elected? Ban all critics?
Hell, you know that’s what Obama did, sent the entire media on vacation for 8 years and left us with the swooning JournOlisters. Joe’s not that bright, he should have sent a “hit man” to the nets 😛
The Fairness Doctrine no longer exists, Joe. Thank Ronnie for that.
These are not spontaneous phone calls, part 2.
Does Liz ever wear anything but black? I know she usually wears a color cardigan or jacket, but it seems she always pairs everything with black pants and a black shirt. I’m not suggesting orange pantsuits or Mao wear like Hillary, but damn.
I guess I’m sexist for asking that. Men generally wear suits in only a handful of colors.
To tell you the truth, I really haven’t noticed what the Dem ladies are wearing, so they must not be too awful. 😀 Love it, Mao wear.
Warren always wears the black column and a bright sweater or unconstructed blazer. It’s a lot more relatable than what Hillary wore. Women looked at Hillary’s clothes and though “where exactly do those clothes come from, I’ve never seen anything like that in the store”. Warren’s look can be purchased on QVC. Warren also stays very skinny and jumps around a lot and charges the stairs and all that makes her different than Hillary the fat old lady who could hardly do stairs.
I get relatable, retail politics 101. It just seems she could mix it up with some navy, brown or khaki, coupled with her colorful cardigans and jackets.
I think she always looks like someone’s uptight aunt. Not a funt at all and not your own aunt. Someone elses.
I like the way she dresses. Even though it is the same style every time, it works for her. It actually is relatable to those of us who had to wear decent clothes to work every day but not look uppity or like a clothes horse.
I LOVE THIS ONE
https://scontent-mia3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/72231934_403465636983388_520991477308850176_n.jpg?_nc_cat=100&_nc_eui2=AeHZenBsjS0de-nD8vCqEvfLW_qiYG3scbFjWQy9fauJiUXEawS5wqr8Maq3Dz8f0d9xaJu3yNnDVrb4G1fxvCtODoP43e8LbN14VUolfdfFyw&_nc_oc=AQnSQFS1uAVdK37NTOwiLxaa_umhnJqAALGpa6_aqUlzk7Y-hNXNYIzp71PcG1q6UqcmD1PI2BTswoJkkCJOnmGR&_nc_ht=scontent-mia3-2.xx&oh=34b7d366f25f37482259502e1b3727ff&oe=5E372E11
That is good!
True. 🙂
That was so wonderful! I just sent it to my Left loving family members. It will be a quiet holiday season this year.
Cleanup on I’ll one . . .
I generally ignore typos, but I couldn’t resist this one. 🙂
You’re wrong to question whether Trump should have released the full transcript. Anything short of the full transcript would leave room for the Dems to make up more shit than they already have.
As for precedent–fuck precedent. The way the dems and the media have acted since the election is without precedent. The CIA, led by Brennen, and Comey’s FBI are openly and with the full approval of the media and DNC spying on the duly elected President of the United States of America. Hillary Clinton went on TV today and claimed Trump is illegitimate. You can say Trump is playing defense all you want, but the ONLY way you can defeat this kind of lunacy and hysteria is with the truth, the whole truth & nothing but the truth. Period. This is not conveniential politics. And if it hurts future presidents, blame the Dems & the media.
❤ Great comment! I hate Hillary to hell.
Word!
Wait, I never said Trump was playing defense. I said Democrats are.
I get why Trump released the transcript. There was nothing there. But I still think it may have been a mistake. There may be things I’m not seeing, and if this eventually leads to more transparency overall in government, I will applaud that outcome.
I agree this unhingedness coming from the deep state, which clearly includes many elected Democrats and much of the media, is unprecedented.
I want to see all Obama admin. communication with Iran. P.S. I hate the term “quid pro quo.”
This is just a general comment.
Quid pro Joe?
I misread. You write about the release of the transcript then started next paragraph with “This looks like a defensive play.” Going back & re-reading I see where I made my mistske.
I still disagree that Trump may have made a mistake re: precedent for reasons I stated. There is no precedent and if Trump doesn’t break the swamp once & for all, it won’t matter anyway. That is, if Dems pull this off there will NEVER be another non-uniparty POTUS again. The Dems actions are an existential threat.
And I’ll add that I think that Trump did think twice before he did release the transcript. He raised the precedent issues publicly before releasing & he waited some 3 or 4 days obviously until he consulted with Ukraine President.
I definitely agree that none of this will matter if he doesn’t do something about the swamp. It’s ridiculous what these assholes get away with. Honestly, I have secret fantasies that I wake up one day to the news that EVEYTHING has been declassified. 😂🙏👍
Amen!!!
Love the replies.
I can’t deal with listening everything that comes out of her mouth is a lie
I watched this horrid propaganda Sunday morning. I was so angered by this effort to legitimize the Left and HRC efforts to disenfranchise 63million voters and call the election illegitimate. It was disgusting. And I kept reminding myself of what HRC said in the debate when she implied the conservatives wouldn’t accept the election results (when she won) and how dangerous that would be.
OMG when I think about how I held her I such high regard in 2008!! How blind I was! And now,the ppl who called me racist in 2008 because I supported her rather than TehOne, those ppl are giving her full throated support. smh
Savages.
PLASTIC STRAW
I am waiting to hear her start singing will you love me tomorrow to Trump
https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2019/09/29/whistleblowers-lawyers-contradict-adam-schiff-interview-with-60-minutes-on-potential-testimony/
he does not know the meaning of the word truth
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/antifa-thugs-harass-block-and-scream-nazi-scum-at-senior-woman-with-a-walker-outside-dave-rubin-event-in-canada-video/
the more I see these useless cowards, the more I believe in the SOS law shoot on sight. You can use a stun gun and aim for the little privates they have. That way they can not reproduce which is doing the world a favor
keep reading about the idiot mayor on NYC making the words illegal alien a crime to speak. So would criminal intruder be ok to say?
This segment, on Life, Liberty, and Levin, reveals, via his guest, partially, the depth, breadth, and expanse of the corruption of the Bidens.
And his guest, Peter Schweizer, has written a best selling book, with those details and more, involving so many more members of Congress. He goes into what Hunter Biden did with the money, once he brought it back to the states.And none of this is secret.
I was gobsmacked. I shouldn’t have been, given what we know so far, but I was.
Why should we worry about the Chinese, stealing our military secrets, when Hunter Biden’s company sells those secrets to them?
https://www.foxnews.com/shows/life-liberty-levin
20 Jobs that were popular in 1980 that have almost disappeared:
Only two of those jobs really disappeared. The others just left the country.
Some Democrats deserve to die for doing something. At least kill four for the Benghazi four.