John Lewis is a Hero (and a Douchebag)

largemouth-bass-underwater 150310074320-john-lewis-selma-bridge-50-years-exlarge-169

Separated at birth?

It’s not either/or.

Congressman John Lewis (D-GA) is a bonafide civil rights hero.  In fighting for civil rights and an end to segregation he was arrested and/or beaten many times.  For that he deserves respect and honor.  He has received numerous honors and awards for what he did when he was a young man.

But that was 50 years ago.  Since then he has been an ultra-liberal hack politician and has been occupying a Democrat safe seat in Congress since 1987.  He is a douchebag.

Those two things are not mutually exclusive.

Charles Rangel (D-NY) and Duke Cunningham (R-CA) are both war heroes.  Both men served in the US Congress.  Both men are crooks.  Rangel was censured by Congress.  Cunningham was sent to prison.  Both men are now “retired”.

A couple days ago John Lewis said that Donald Trump is not a legitimate President.  (That wasn’t the first time he claimed a President wasn’t legitimate.)  Trump responded by saying that Lewis was a bad congressman.

Now the usual suspects are outraged and upset that Trump would dare to impugn the integrity of a civil rights icon.

I say fuck John Lewis.  Nobody gets a free ride forever.  If he wants to throw punches he’s gotta expect to get hit back.  Anyone who attacks or insults Trump should expect him to respond in kind.  He’s a counterpuncher.

As of this writing there are 5 days, 5 hours, and 22 minutes until Donald Trump is President.

Posted in Uncategorized | 146 Comments

How Trump Saved Christmas


Posted in Uncategorized | 153 Comments

How the White House Manipulates the “News”


This unintentional reveal is scary and sickening. It was published last May by the NYT in a vomit-inducing hagiographic puff-piece about Ben Rhoades, Obama’s “foreign policy guru“.

As the deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, Rhodes writes the president’s speeches, plans his trips abroad and runs communications strategy across the White House, tasks that, taken individually, give little sense of the importance of his role. He is, according to the consensus of the two dozen current and former White House insiders I talked to, the single most influential voice shaping American foreign policy aside from Potus himself. The president and Rhodes communicate “regularly, several times a day,” according to Denis McDonough, Obama’s chief of staff, who is known for captaining a tight ship. “I see it throughout the day in person,” he says, adding that he is sure that in addition to the two to three hours that Rhodes might spend with Obama daily, the two men communicate remotely throughout the day via email and phone calls. Rhodes strategized and ran the successful Iran-deal messaging campaign, helped negotiate the opening of American relations with Cuba after a hiatus of more than 50 years and has been a co-writer of all of Obama’s major foreign-policy speeches. “Every day he does 12 jobs, and he does them better than the other people who have those jobs,” Terry Szuplat, the longest-tenured member of the National Security Council speechwriting corps, told me. On the largest and smallest questions alike, the voice in which America speaks to the world is that of Ben Rhodes.

Like Obama, Rhodes is a storyteller who uses a writer’s tools to advance an agenda that is packaged as politics but is often quite personal. He is adept at constructing overarching plotlines with heroes and villains, their conflicts and motivations supported by flurries of carefully chosen adjectives, quotations and leaks from named and unnamed senior officials. He is the master shaper and retailer of Obama’s foreign-policy narratives, at a time when the killer wave of social media has washed away the sand castles of the traditional press. His ability to navigate and shape this new environment makes him a more effective and powerful extension of the president’s will than any number of policy advisers or diplomats or spies. His lack of conventional real-world experience of the kind that normally precedes responsibility for the fate of nations — like military or diplomatic service, or even a master’s degree in international relations, rather than creative writing — is still startling.


Price turns to his computer and begins tapping away at the administration’s well-cultivated network of officials, talking heads, columnists and newspaper reporters, web jockeys and outside advocates who can tweet at critics and tweak their stories backed up by quotations from “senior White House officials” and “spokespeople.” I watch the message bounce from Rhodes’s brain to Price’s keyboard to the three big briefing podiums — the White House, the State Department and the Pentagon — and across the Twitterverse, where it springs to life in dozens of insta-stories, which over the next five hours don formal dress for mainstream outlets. It’s a tutorial in the making of a digital news microclimate — a storm that is easy to mistake these days for a fact of nature, but whose author is sitting next to me right now.


With three hours to go until the president’s address to Congress, Rhodes grabs a big Gatorade and starts combing through the text of the State of the Union address. I peek over his shoulder, to get a sense of the meta-narrative that will shape dozens of thumb-suckers in the days and weeks to follow. One sentence reads: “But as we focus on destroying ISIL, over-the-top claims that this is World War III just play into their hands.” He retypes a word, then changes it back, before continuing with his edit. “Masses of fighters on the back of pickup trucks, twisted souls plotting in apartments or garages — they pose an enormous danger to civilians; they have to be stopped. But they do not threaten our national existence.”

Watching Rhodes work, I remember that he is still, chiefly, a writer, who is using a new set of tools — along with the traditional arts of narrative and spin — to create stories of great consequence on the biggest page imaginable. The narratives he frames, the voices of senior officials, the columnists and reporters whose work he skillfully shapes and ventriloquizes, and even the president’s own speeches and talking points, are the only dots of color in a much larger vision about who Americans are and where we are going that Rhodes and the president have been formulating together over the past seven years. When I asked Jon Favreau, Obama’s lead speechwriter in the 2008 campaign, and a close friend of Rhodes’s, whether he or Rhodes or the president had ever thought of their individual speeches and bits of policy making as part of some larger restructuring of the American narrative, he replied, “We saw that as our entire job.”

Rhodes singled out a key example to me one day, laced with the brutal contempt that is a hallmark of his private utterances. “All these newspapers used to have foreign bureaus,” he said. “Now they don’t. They call us to explain to them what’s happening in Moscow and Cairo. Most of the outlets are reporting on world events from Washington. The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns. That’s a sea change. They literally know nothing.”

In this environment, Rhodes has become adept at ventriloquizing many people at once. Ned Price, Rhodes’s assistant, gave me a primer on how it’s done. The easiest way for the White House to shape the news, he explained, is from the briefing podiums, each of which has its own dedicated press corps. “But then there are sort of these force multipliers,” he said, adding, “We have our compadres, I will reach out to a couple people, and you know I wouldn’t want to name them — ”

“I can name them,” I said, ticking off a few names of prominent Washington reporters and columnists who often tweet in sync with White House messaging.

Price laughed. “I’ll say, ‘Hey, look, some people are spinning this narrative that this is a sign of American weakness,’ ” he continued, “but — ”

“In fact it’s a sign of strength!” I said, chuckling.

“And I’ll give them some color,” Price continued, “and the next thing I know, lots of these guys are in the dot-com publishing space, and have huge Twitter followings, and they’ll be putting this message out on their own.”

This is something different from old-fashioned spin, which tended to be an art best practiced in person. In a world where experienced reporters competed for scoops and where carrying water for the White House was a cause for shame, no matter which party was in power, it was much harder to sustain a “narrative” over any serious period of time. Now the most effectively weaponized 140-character idea or quote will almost always carry the day, and it is very difficult for even good reporters to necessarily know where the spin is coming from or why.

There is a bunch more and you should go read it. The article does mention that Ben Rhodes’ brother is David Rhodes, the president of CBS News. The article doesn’t mention that Rhodes was the author of the Benghazi talking points.

This is why Trump won. This is why the news media no longer has any credibility.

Meanwhile, journalists are upset because Trump tweets directly to the country without using a media filter.

Master and Minion

Master and Minion

Posted in Uncategorized | 124 Comments

Just Another Open Thread

The last one was full so I’m starting a fresh one.


Posted in Uncategorized | 61 Comments

Trump Day Open Thread

The Trumpening Will Continue Until Media Improves

The Trumpening Will Continue Until Media Improves

via Branco

Also, in case you missed it last summer, check out Angie’s review of Trump The Press by Don Surber.


Posted in Uncategorized | 154 Comments

Overnight Open Thread

I don’t wear women’s clothes or take women’s vitamins so why would I go to a women’s march?

More here.

Posted in Uncategorized | 81 Comments

Bad Karaoke Open Thread

Starring Emma Stone, Natalie Portman, Amy Adams, Matthew McConaughey, Chris Pine, Hailee Steinfeld, Felicity Jones, and Taraji P. Henson.

Posted in Uncategorized | 111 Comments