PALINPALOOZA 2011!!!!

WORLD EXCLUSIVE! SARAH PALIN BOMBSHELL BOOK SHOCKING CLAIMS!

Publishing sources familiar with the contents of author Joe McGinniss’ highly-anticipated book “The Rogue: Searching for the Real Sarah Palin” have revealed shocking secrets that will impact her decision to enter the 2012 presidential race.

In the book, which will be published on September 20th, McGinniss claims Sarah had a steamy interracial hookup with basketball stud GLEN RICE less than a year before she eloped with her husband Todd.

Sarah hooked up with the NBA great, then a 6-foot-8 junior at the University of Michigan when he was playing in a college basketball tournament in Alaska in 1987, the book says. At the time, Sarah, just out of college, was working as a sports reporter for the Anchorage TV station KTUU.

A publishing source told The ENQUIRER that McGinniss claims Sarah had a “fetish” for black men at the time and he quotes a friend as saying Sarah had “hauled (Rice’s) ass down.”

A source unrelated to the book told The ENQUIRER, Todd was very much in the picture at the time and the couple married just nine months later.

In the book, McGinniss quotes Rice as confirming the one-night stand.

According to the publishing source, McGinniss confirms an ENQUIRER exclusive – published in our Oct. 6, 2008 print issue – that Sarah carried on an extramarital affair with Todd’s business partner Brad Hanson, and Todd dissolved their snowmobile dealership after he learned about the affair.McGinniss writes in the book that the affair lasted six months and he fuels rumors that the couple’s marriage has been on the rocks for decades.

In another bombshell, the publishing source says, McGinniss writes that both Sarah and Todd dabbled in cocaine use. “The Rogue” claims that before Palin became Alaska governor she was seen snorting cocaine off an overturned 55-gallon oil drum while snowmobiling with pals.

FOR THE FULL SHOCKING STORY WITH ALL THE DETAILS YOU WON’T FIND ANYWHERE ELSE — it’s only in the NEW ENQUIRER — ON SALE NOW!

And people try to say her 15 minutes of fame are over.

BTW – Andrew Sullivan is in wanker heaven right now.


FAKE


This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

43 Responses to PALINPALOOZA 2011!!!!

  1. Rocky Hussein Squirrel says:

    What does this do to “Sarah Palin hates black people?”

  2. yttik says:

    “…before Palin became Alaska governor she was seen snorting cocaine off an overturned 55-gallon oil drum while snowmobiling with pals…”

    I…..uhm…..have heard from anonymous sources, a friend of a friend of a friend, uh, you know, that it is impossible to snort cocaine off a 55 gallon oil drum in the middle of an Alaska winter.

  3. DandyTiger says:

    What, no proof that Trig isn’t hers in this book. What a let down.

  4. Monster from the Id says:

    She did the nasty with E. T. and gave birth to Bat Boy. True story!!!1! 😉

    “Once you go off Earth, no one else has worth”–Spurious Sarah :mrgreen:

  5. leslie says:

    BTW – Andrew Sullivan is in wanker heaven right now.

    I just had to close my office door (again)
    ROFL

  6. WMCB says:

    ROTFLMAO!!!! Okay, this is snarkily delicious.

    With all this talk of “Pass the Bill!”, the media hasn’t noticed that there STILL is no bill. Nope, still no “American Jobs Act” submitted by the President.

    So a TX representative noticed this, and in a moment of sheer shit-or-get-off-the-pot genius, has stolen the President’s title for his non-existent bill.

    He submitted his own bill today, entitled the “American Jobs Act”.

    😀 😀 😀

  7. votermom says:

    This reminds me that while I was in the check out line I saw a tabloid, The Globe, that had MO & Hillary on the cover. I peeked at the “story” and it was that Michelle had attacked Hillary for gaining weight and making her anti-obesity campaign look bad. Then Hillary had “broken into tears” and said it was the last straw.
    LOLOLOL. They are so scared of Hillary.

  8. WMCB says:

    OT, but it’s gotten so ridiculous that even WaPo is picking it up. Here’s the WaPo headline:

    Attack Watch, new Obama campaign site to ‘fight smears,’ becomes laughing stock

  9. DeniseVB says:

    Trying to shock us that Sarah hooked up with a black dude a year before she married Todd …… sounds racisssst to me 😉

    Snorting cocaine … Obama, check.
    Interracial affair …. Obama’s mom, check

    ZZzzzzzzzz ……

  10. ralphb says:

    If you notice, even the Enquirer isn’t vouching for anything they printed. A “publishing source said that McGinnis said” is too weak for words.

  11. ralphb says:

    Shocking New Expose On Sarah Palin Not All That Shocking

    A little expose of Joe McGinnis from a first hand account.

    McGinniss’ angle was to attempt to make Chuck Heath out to be some sort of apologist for a sex predator. That wasn’t the case at all. Heath simply felt that the decision to fire the principal was wrong. A debatable position (my family certainly disagreed), but hardly one that reflects on Heath’s character. Indeed, my family and the Heaths/Palins remain friends to this day.

    My response to McGinniss was to politely decline to comment on the matter, saying that it was a long-dead issue with no bearing on Sarah Palin or her political career (she was in high school at the time) and that my family considers the Heaths/Palins to be fine people and friends. In response, McGinnis sent me another email with a concocted narrative making Chuck Heath out to be some sort of enabler of pedophilia and my father as someone willing to tolerate it even as his own daughter was victimized. McGinniss told me that if I didn’t share my version of the story, this was the version he’d have to run with.

    I never responded to the threat, and maybe McGinnis ran with it or maybe he didn’t. I’m not giving him the satisfaction of buying his book to find out.

    The moral of the story, though, is that McGinnis is a slime ball.

  12. ralphb says:

    This is what you get, and may deserve, when you are assholes for too long.

    And where are all the liberal advocates of “civil rights” — or for that matter, where are the feminists? – who should be denouncing McGinniss for purposefully sensationalizing sexual and sexual issues in this tawdry way for mere publicity and political partisanship?

    They have no shame. They have no honor. They are Democrats, implacable enemies of everything good and true, and no decent or honest person could ever associate himself with that foul party.

    Did You Know the Word ‘Miscegenation’ Was Invented by Democrats as a Smear?

  13. More sexism from Doonesbury in Salon about Palin.

    • Sorry, in Slate. Same difference.

    • Worst thing I’ve seen at the Doonesbury site was not in a story strip but in a box on the side, quoting some Wasilla person saying he was tired of “Sarah and her drama.” Not even pretending to be funny.

      Well, the Sunday strip about Sarah criticizing Bachmann and saying she could “fill out a sweater better” was pretty unfair too, unless she’s said something about Bachmann I haven’t heard. WAsn’t that about the time Sarah was putting out a good specific jobs plan? Anyway I’m sure it wasn’t about sweaters.

      I’ve stopped reading him for a while.

  14. bevwky says:

    Well, have you seen this one:

    Sarah Palin / Glen Rice sex story divides Miami Herald newsroom (http://randompixels.blogspot.com/2011/09/sarah-palin-glen-rice-sex-story-divides.html)

    I think more than anything, this is where Sarah may be able to succeed in taking on the double standard because she’s actually taken on the media and made them look at themselves. Will it hold? Not necessarily, but at least some journalists are remembering what job they’re supposed to be doing and why it matters. It’s a start.

    Also, you gotta just love that man of hers that manages the homefront while she tackles Obama head-on 😉 :

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/todd-palin-slams-joe-mcginniss-while-sarah-criticizes-obama/

    • votermom says:

      I think the stuff in McGinnis book is just going to backfire at this point with the general public. Even the most non-political are noticing that the same networks pushing the Sarah is Stupid & Evil stories are the same ones saying that Obama is the greatest president evah.

      • bevwky says:

        Yeah, I tend to think that even the most ardent “supporters” take a step back when told “if you love me, you’ll support this bill” for the basic reason that at heart most Americans do not like to be told what to do in that way.

        You know, what it basically boils down to is that even fads have expiration dates, especially if that’s all they were.

        And with Sarah, it’s not her that we’re supporting, it’s what she stands for and most of what she’s been saying for years now crosses party lines. This isn’t about left or right ideology. This is about saving the country.

        • votermom says:

          Just fyi, because I know you are newish to the fishing hole.
          A lot of us who hang around here support Sarah, but the blog doesn’t officially support her. The blog policy is that you own your vote and you should vote who your conscience tells you to vote for.

        • bevwky says:

          I know that and while it was certainly a general “we’re supporting” as in people who do support her, not as in everyone here does, or even expecting anyone to, to be honest, I’m not sure I would know how else to phrase it anyway because I meant it the way I said it.

          It’s about the country. It’s not about Sarah Palin.

        • votermom says:

          I’m glad 🙂

          Just wanted to put it out there, also for any lurkers.

          I agree with you — it’s about the country. We can’t go on like this. Corruption is kind of like cholesterol – back when the economy was healthy, we could ignore it, but now we are looking at a quadruple bypass if we don;t do something about it. It’s killing us.

  15. votermom says:

    I don’t have a link for this.
    Statement from Todd Palin:

    “This is a man who has been relentlessly stalking my family to the point of moving in right next door to us to harass us and spy on us. He traffics in innuendo and falsehoods. A few years ago he interviewed members of Sarah’s administration for a magazine article, and afterwards they said that he was the most disingenuous and intellectual dishonest writer they’d ever dealt with. He’s spent the last year interviewing marginal figures with an axe to grind in order to churn out a hit piece to satisfy his own creepy obsession with my wife. I’d ask that people consider these facts when evaluating his latest lies.”
    “I’d ask the fathers and husbands of America to consider our privacy when one summer day I found this guy on the deck of the rental property, just 18 feet away next door to us, staring like a creep at my wife while she mowed the lawn in her shorts, unbeknownst to her that he was prying. As well as our teenage daughters while they tried to enjoy our traditional Alaskan summer days outdoors. Joe’s son told the media he advised his dad not to move from the East Coast to become our next door neighbor, but said his dad ‘was just waiting for Todd to be out of the picture.’ Sarah has never spoken to this intruder into our lives, our friends and family don’t speak to him, so we have no idea where he would come up with content for his book. He was on our doorstep one day trying to make conversation with our son until Track cut the conversation short after discerning Joe’s odd behavior, and I spoke to him one time when I saw him 18 feet away, just to find out who he was. He took that conversation and reported it to the media as me ‘threatening’ him.”

  16. bevwky says:

    Another reason this one is going to backfire big time is that the last few years have proved almost conclusively that the pundits and elites have almost no understanding of who and what Palin is in a religious context – so how in the world can they pigeonhole her in terms of what she might’ve done in the past sexually, one way or another?

    And even if they could, is it any of their business?

    They talk about the freedom of the individual, but do they respect it? They scream about privacy, but do they grant it?

    She’s just about proven conclusively what the answer to those two are.

    Ever since Palin in particular came on the national scene, some of the squawking that’s come out of the media regarding religious beliefs is particularly hilarious to me, having a background as a not-so-strict fundamentalist, evangelical, right-winger as I do. I mean sometimes the media act more straight-laced than they accuse “social conservatives” of being. Think we are. Should be. Whatever.

    It’s simply fascinating the standards they believe we hold ourselves to sometimes, when we’re out doing just about anything we please. Just like everyone else. It’s called freedom. 😉

    And for that matter equality.

Comments are closed.